Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Reading through another thread I am confirming my limited knowledge of the 4 stroke engine.

Please someone post a pic of where the squish area is on a head. I think it would help some of us less educated people understand more easily.

Does compression ratio change squish?

Headgasket thickness?

If you modify the combustion chamber?

Anything else thatll effect it?

Importance bt turbo and NA engines?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78651-squish-you-squish-me/
Share on other sites

In the photo that's hopefully below, the area with the red squigles on it is the quench/squish are. Basically it is the area where the flat surface of the head face sits over the flat areas on the piston. "quench" is because these areas run cooler than the rest of the chamber as very little combustion actually happens in these areas. "squish" is because these areas squish the air/fuel mixture in towards the spark plug.

In order with your questions,

1. There is no direct relation between quench area and compression, although moving the piston closer to the head will increase compression. The closer the piston runs to the head, the more compression you can run without detonation or at the same compression you can run more timing.

2. Head gasket thickness does affect quench, the closer the piston sits to the head without hitting it, the more complete combustion you will have as a shock wave is formed between the flat areas, pushing the air/fuel mixture in towards the spark plug. A thicker head gasket will move the faces further apart and result in less efficient combustion.

3. If you modify the combustion chamber on the flat areas it will affect it, Jun machines most of the quench pads away and their engines make great power, I'm not sure of the exact reason why they do it though. It still leaves a ring around the outside of the chamber that sits over the piston though.

4. Machining the top of the block will move the pistons closer to the head, machining the head will not make any difference to piston to head clearance, it will increse compression and decrease piston to valve clearance though.

5. I'd say it's equally important in both turbo and n/a engines.

There are a lot of different thoughts on quench area. Endyne in the US do a lot of hondas and say that the actual compression doesnt matter in a turbo engine as long as the piston top has the right profile. They also shape their pistons to push the air/fuel mixture towards the spark plug and the exhaust side of the chamber. It's an interesting idea and they have the numbers on the board to show it works. If you're interested, have a look at www.theoldone.com theres quite a few days reading there.

here's a copy of a post i made on another forum regarding squish/quench on an RB25/30, it's dumbed down a fair bit but only to make it easier to understand. fluid mechanics can be a bitch to get your head around if i use the proper terminology:

when the piston gets to top dead centre, and the head surface is 40thou away from the piston edge, the air/fuel mixture which is there encounters a bit of a problem. it's trying to be compressed (locally) very forcefully by huge local pressures and hence wants to get the f*ck out of there. it therefore gets pushed at huge velocity the only way it can go: inwards. this creates a lot of turbulence in the combustion chamber which mixes the fuel/air mixture even more and also causes it to swirl at huge velocity. it has the added effect of forcing the mixture up to the middle of the combustion chamber (at such huge piston velocities the local pressure changes actually stay as changes rather than homogenising for a fraction of a second which is all it needs) where the spark plug is.

so when it sparks, you get a very well mixed, turbulent mixture igniting. it reduces local "hotspots" and improves the efficiency (completeness) of the burn.

the squish band is illustrated here: the flat edges of the piston which come very very close to hitting the squish areas on the head, shown in the 2nd picture. the universal standard for squish is about 40 thou on a high-revving engine to allow for rod/crank/piston stretch at high RPM. you can go as low as 30thou safely though.

so if you think about it, if the flat areas on the edge of the piston are exactly level with the top of the block (as in an RB30) at top dead centre, and the head shown here (RB25) has flat squish areas exactly level with the head face, then the only thing stopping the piston hitting the head on the edges is the head gasket thickness. luckily for us, it's 47 thou which crushes to about 38-45 thou at full torque.

goat.jpg

explanatory2.jpg

Great post Craig, not easy to explain in plain English. My 20 cents worth on this bit;

3. If you modify the combustion chamber on the flat areas it will affect it, Jun machines most of the quench pads away and their engines make great power, I'm not sure of the exact reason why they do it though. It still leaves a ring around the outside of the chamber that sits over the piston though.

I think Jun are caught between a rock and hard place, They need to lower the compression ratio to run the huge boost, but they know they will have detonation issues if they stick a thick head gasket in there. Using a bowled piston would have the same effect. They can't machine out the combustion chamber as there is not enough metal to the water jacket. So they remove the squish ramps. Certainly not ideal, but the best of a bad bunch of choices.

:)

In real world terms what would this acheive, eg: better efficiency & how better, more overall response, more HP, smoother revving, etc

If some people have followed the Japanese trend and have installed 1.6mm head gaskets which have cost a small fortune - is it worth removing and obtaining squish because they would of obviously lost this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
    • Just wanted to say thank you for your input   my man (lead mechanic by trade) and I have done a heap of work as you can imagine just to make the hot side work with the dump pipe, stupid massive intake on turbo, trying to get the waste gate on was not fun.  I’m kinda getting to the point where I don’t know if I try and make this work and not throw all this cash and time away or do I scrap the lot and start again? the Apexi I’ve got was tuned for a few slight differences:   Tomei pon cams (mine are stock neo) Turbo smart 38mm external waste gate (mines 45mm replumbed) with stainless screamer pipe  3inch turbo back exhaust with high flow cat Sard 800cc top feed injectors Sard adjustable fuel pressure reg    
    • Out here E90s are the cheapest way into a sporty-ish car because everyone knows just how expensive the repairs can get. 8-10k USD for an automatic 335i. 
    • Noted. Have noticed BMW are more 'high maintenance' for sure. They've attracted my attention as I think the used car prices seem reasonable vs other options, and the extra quality overall vs a commodore / camry / corolla or similar of the same vintage is appealing, especially the interior, and they are more on the sporty side whereas the others mentioned can be more cruising or economical A-to-B only.
×
×
  • Create New...