Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Reading through another thread I am confirming my limited knowledge of the 4 stroke engine.

Please someone post a pic of where the squish area is on a head. I think it would help some of us less educated people understand more easily.

Does compression ratio change squish?

Headgasket thickness?

If you modify the combustion chamber?

Anything else thatll effect it?

Importance bt turbo and NA engines?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78651-squish-you-squish-me/
Share on other sites

In the photo that's hopefully below, the area with the red squigles on it is the quench/squish are. Basically it is the area where the flat surface of the head face sits over the flat areas on the piston. "quench" is because these areas run cooler than the rest of the chamber as very little combustion actually happens in these areas. "squish" is because these areas squish the air/fuel mixture in towards the spark plug.

In order with your questions,

1. There is no direct relation between quench area and compression, although moving the piston closer to the head will increase compression. The closer the piston runs to the head, the more compression you can run without detonation or at the same compression you can run more timing.

2. Head gasket thickness does affect quench, the closer the piston sits to the head without hitting it, the more complete combustion you will have as a shock wave is formed between the flat areas, pushing the air/fuel mixture in towards the spark plug. A thicker head gasket will move the faces further apart and result in less efficient combustion.

3. If you modify the combustion chamber on the flat areas it will affect it, Jun machines most of the quench pads away and their engines make great power, I'm not sure of the exact reason why they do it though. It still leaves a ring around the outside of the chamber that sits over the piston though.

4. Machining the top of the block will move the pistons closer to the head, machining the head will not make any difference to piston to head clearance, it will increse compression and decrease piston to valve clearance though.

5. I'd say it's equally important in both turbo and n/a engines.

There are a lot of different thoughts on quench area. Endyne in the US do a lot of hondas and say that the actual compression doesnt matter in a turbo engine as long as the piston top has the right profile. They also shape their pistons to push the air/fuel mixture towards the spark plug and the exhaust side of the chamber. It's an interesting idea and they have the numbers on the board to show it works. If you're interested, have a look at www.theoldone.com theres quite a few days reading there.

here's a copy of a post i made on another forum regarding squish/quench on an RB25/30, it's dumbed down a fair bit but only to make it easier to understand. fluid mechanics can be a bitch to get your head around if i use the proper terminology:

when the piston gets to top dead centre, and the head surface is 40thou away from the piston edge, the air/fuel mixture which is there encounters a bit of a problem. it's trying to be compressed (locally) very forcefully by huge local pressures and hence wants to get the f*ck out of there. it therefore gets pushed at huge velocity the only way it can go: inwards. this creates a lot of turbulence in the combustion chamber which mixes the fuel/air mixture even more and also causes it to swirl at huge velocity. it has the added effect of forcing the mixture up to the middle of the combustion chamber (at such huge piston velocities the local pressure changes actually stay as changes rather than homogenising for a fraction of a second which is all it needs) where the spark plug is.

so when it sparks, you get a very well mixed, turbulent mixture igniting. it reduces local "hotspots" and improves the efficiency (completeness) of the burn.

the squish band is illustrated here: the flat edges of the piston which come very very close to hitting the squish areas on the head, shown in the 2nd picture. the universal standard for squish is about 40 thou on a high-revving engine to allow for rod/crank/piston stretch at high RPM. you can go as low as 30thou safely though.

so if you think about it, if the flat areas on the edge of the piston are exactly level with the top of the block (as in an RB30) at top dead centre, and the head shown here (RB25) has flat squish areas exactly level with the head face, then the only thing stopping the piston hitting the head on the edges is the head gasket thickness. luckily for us, it's 47 thou which crushes to about 38-45 thou at full torque.

goat.jpg

explanatory2.jpg

Great post Craig, not easy to explain in plain English. My 20 cents worth on this bit;

3. If you modify the combustion chamber on the flat areas it will affect it, Jun machines most of the quench pads away and their engines make great power, I'm not sure of the exact reason why they do it though. It still leaves a ring around the outside of the chamber that sits over the piston though.

I think Jun are caught between a rock and hard place, They need to lower the compression ratio to run the huge boost, but they know they will have detonation issues if they stick a thick head gasket in there. Using a bowled piston would have the same effect. They can't machine out the combustion chamber as there is not enough metal to the water jacket. So they remove the squish ramps. Certainly not ideal, but the best of a bad bunch of choices.

:)

In real world terms what would this acheive, eg: better efficiency & how better, more overall response, more HP, smoother revving, etc

If some people have followed the Japanese trend and have installed 1.6mm head gaskets which have cost a small fortune - is it worth removing and obtaining squish because they would of obviously lost this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
    • Sorry, I wasn't very clear.....just that the standard injectors are apparently good over 600rwhp/450rwkw which you won't get to on standard turbos anyway.....they are much better sized from factory than we are used to in RBs.
    • I'm not sure where you are, but United Terrey Hills has E85. 
×
×
  • Create New...