Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have just heard that the std VL turbo exhaust housing is almost identical to the VG30. T3 flange .63 a/r. I was told there was a slight differance, can't remember what, but would not effect the operation and mounting of the turbo. The flange on the dump pipe is different though, thus a custom dump whould be required.

Can someone in the know confirm/reject this theory, please?

Can the std VL housing be used, instead of the VG30?

Al, somebody said that to me too, but because the exhaust flange is different, it would make it a pain in the butt to get custom parts made up.

I can't confirm 100% though.

I have a guy who thinks he may have a couple for us though. VG30DET that is.

Great, I still would prefer the VG30det turbo exhaust housing.

But if i am unable to get one, i still have my 3.5" front pipe from my previous exhaust so all i need to do is get a dump pipe made up at my local exhaust shop, no big deal really :rofl:.

I picked mine up last night.. whahahah. :D

I managed to pick up a second handy one that apparently works (it feels and looks in good nick) for $300.

Thanks for not cutting my lunch Bass Junky. lol :(

I'm starting to doubt it is in fact a .81 or there abouts.

I've got a what was meant to be a .82 ARB GT35R machined housing. The GT35R housing is quite a bit bigger.

I'll have to find out how to measure the a/r and well... Measure it! ;)

Area to radius ratio is difficult to measure without sectioning (cutting up) the casting . These Hitachi housings never had the ARR size cast into them like Garrett's housings do . My impression looking at all three is RB20 type = miniscule

, RB25 type = small , VG30 type = huge . They really do have a lot of volute area inside them but remember they were designed to not choke a three litre V6 .

Cubes do you intent to run the complete VG30 turbo or some kind of bitza thing .

Cheers A .

Yeah, I agree with bass, for around the $2000 you get a turbo that puts you easily over the 250kw realistically and closer to 280. Is a bolt in situation, no modifications required for the fitting which is a big plus..And retains the stock look for any enquiring eyes. I know I was disappointed with my stock Hiflow struggling to get 240kw with the usual mods. I know for sure i was disappointed in my HKS cams, I thought they were a waste of money. But I think now with the VG30 Turbine housing the cams might be getting breathing space.  One last thought is that I feel i'm comming to the end of my quest for more power. SK's theory of 280kw max is good for me.  

Ian

what bolt on turbo can I get for 2k that makes 280rwkw ? and where can I get one ?

Bass Junky,

Are you sure they don't have any? I was in there only a few days ago and they had quite a few.

Your not confusing Option1 Garage with D1 Garage?

Discopotato,

I plan on initially running the as is VG30DET turbo, I'm keen to see how well it goes.

I know the RB20DET turbo makes 175rwkw on 9psi from 4400-4950rpm. Lets see how the vg30 differs. :)

I figure it should make 210rwkw on the dyno that I run on (rb25's make 190-200rwkw with rb25det turbo's and approx 11psi).

Should be interestering too see.

To be honest the exhaust a/r doesn't look much bigger than the rb20det turbo i'm running.

When I was up at D1 Garage I noticed there are 2 different types of rb20det turbo's, mine and a smaller looking one.

It has what looks like a smaller exhaust housing and a different designed compressor inlet, mine steps up to the compressor wheel where as the other smaller one has a smaller inlet steps down then steps back up to the compressor wheel.

This hi-flow sounds like the perfect upgrade here, and correct me if I am wrong in saying this but cant you get a Garrett GT3071r that has a T3 flange and a Option for a nissan .63 ar internally gated zuast housing capable of making 280 rwkw easy for about 1900-2100 dollars????

If I had to make a choice between a engineered turbo and a re-engineered turbo I know what I would go for...

Yes I know that its a RTA risk & you still have to run water & oil lines so add $250 and a heat shield.

I guess the following would be about right.

Turbo = free

High Flow = $1950 (max)

exhaust housing or busted turbo = $150

I assume the exhaust housing machining could be done when th turbo is high flowed so no additional price.

Total, $2100

I think

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
    • yeah, there's a country that recently started importing Skylines, I blame them.
×
×
  • Create New...