Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats just it GunMetal.

GCG have been around for quite some time and appear to make very reliable turbo's.

Lots of testing and in their earlier fiddlings lots of surge.

They have since pulled the 500hp model as it was possibly over compressored. :rofl:

The GT30 500hp from Horsepowerinabox I doubt with the internally gated .63 will make much more than 250rwkw. As the GCG unit tends to make ~240-250rwkw also.

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Sorry I think you mis-understood me mate, I am in favour of the GT30 option and was refering to the hi-flow as being a re-engineered stocker. Now that I think about it, putting a .63 nissan style zaust housing on a GT30 is some what re-engineering too :P

  Cubes said:
Thats just it GunMetal.

GCG have been around for quite some time and appear to make very reliable turbo's.

Lots of testing and in their earlier fiddlings lots of surge.

They have since pulled the 500hp model as it was possibly over compressored. :rofl:

I would love to get my hands on the GT3071r below if it was a T3. I agree with you in saying that the horsepowerinabox GT30 with the .63 zaust housing would not make much more than 250rwkw :{

Any idea of the price of the GT3071r???

Sorry for the hijack guys, last off topic post I promise.

  Cubes said:
Here's a genuine garrett engineered item for us RB30 heads.

550hp

http://www.gcg.com.au/Catalogue_Menus/Garr...tbb_gt3071r.htm

more you want moooore...

http://www.gcg.com.au/Catalogue_Menus/Garr...b_gt3540_iw.htm

That first turbo is NOT a propper Garrett GT3071R . That thing is what ATP Turbo call the GT3071R "wastegated" , HKS call theirs a GT2835 .

The one pictured uses a GT28 turbine housing with a T25/28 mounting flange .

The real GT3071R uses a GT30 turbine and exhaust housing with a T3 flange and non gated .

  Sydneykid said:
Hi Ian, what cams did I tell you to buy?  :innocent:

What cams would you recommend for a GCG hiflow with a VG30 ext housing? I am considering Tomei Poncams [ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm] , with Tomei valve springs [To Suit RB25DET Lift ~8.80] and possibly "race porting" the head.

PS: Are the valve springs required? Car is running std bottom end with rev limiter set to 7200rpm.

ive got a hpinabox gt30 with 70comp cover and .63 a/r internally wastegated and it is actually put together by gcg turbos. as for power i got 260rwkws at 20 psi. now my engines is almost fully rebuilt with tomei pon cams i will let you know how it goes. please dont critisize a product that you havent even road tested.

are we talking about the same turbo? no. my turbo is a 500hp gt30. yours is a hks gt30 which although rated at 480ps plus what ever , they can make alot more power than the equivilent garret gt30. im not after stupid comments , im not trying to out do anyone. my gt30 pulls 230 rwkws at 13 psi and 260rwkws at 20psi with internal wastegate and standard cams end of story. im sick to death of people saying thats shit this is better blah blah blah. how about i stick a hks t51r and blow you all away or a t88 which would probably pull 280rwkws at 12 psi , who cares.im not trying to out do anyone i was just making the comment in reply to cubes who said that my type of turbo will have truble pulling 250rwkws . i did not put this combination together to win dyno comps or to try to impress anyone.

Carl,

Loose the attitude. I simply stated it 'may' have trouble pulling more than 250rwkw.

  Quote
I would prefer the GCG option over the horsepowerinabox option as I don't know the history of development and results the turbo produces.

The point I was making is GCG is reputable, they make reliable turbos and most know it.

I haven't seen results from Horsepowerinabox, I am unsure where they get their turbo's done, when asked if the 500hp internal gate turbo is the same as the gcg item, they stated "its from the same place gcg get their turbo's from"

EDIT: It looks as if GCG does indeed machine up the turbine housings for them.

  bigcarl said:
are we talking about the same turbo? no.  

Well, alot of people are saying a GT30 is a GT30 - that garrett and hks are the same and that gcg or horsepower can make the same turbo as hks

different debate, BUT this was talking about a small turbine AR on a GT30 turbo - and that is why I said what I said. You are splitting hairs about a 20hp difference in rating - and the smaller rated turbo should make less power than the higher rated turbo.

  Quote
im sick to death of people saying thats shit this is better blah blah blah.  

Just pointing out that your turbo's performance is pretty damn ordinary - my comparison was with stock cams too. Dude, if that is the best you can do with that turbo, there are serious issues somewhere else in your setup, cos it just isnt performing well at all. Other guys on here have the same turbine housing and making tons more power than you - even with stock cams - give GTSt-VSPEC a pm and see what he managed.

I am sick to death of people getting defensive on this forum over there average performance. You ask others not to judge without having test driven, well I dont need to test drive to tell you the performance is pretty damn ordinary.

  Quote
.... im not after stupid comments....

how about i stick a hks t51r and blow you all away or a t88 which would probably pull 280rwkws at 12 psi ,...

anyone notice the contradiction here?

  Quote
who cares.im not trying to out do anyone i was just making the comment in reply to cubes who said that my type of turbo will have truble pulling 250rwkws . i did not put this combination together to win dyno comps or to try to impress anyone.

Thats good, because you wont impress anyone. Have a look at the figures you posted, 230rwkw at 13psi, AND ANOTHER 7 PSI TO MAKE 30 KW - what looks wrong here? obviously you have some serious issues - either your setup is very, very ordinary, or as Cubes says, the turbo is really having trouble.

get defensive as you like, your setup is ordinary and needs some serious sorting.

push that turbo out of its efficiency range if you like, I certainly dont care, but to use it as an example of a GT30 with 0.63 housing make over 250rwkw easily - you are dreaming.

But seriously, rather then attacking one another, is it work asking the question, bigcarl are you running a cat, what diam exhaust, what air filter/IC, what boost controller?

You hit the nail on the head, its the setup, not just the turbo. And lets not forget tuners and dynos:( To get some sort of feeling about how it all works you have to look a bit closer, dont you?

But i agree, you are making good power at 13psi, and it seems you having to wind a lot more boost into it for the extra power. Could be worth having a closer look at, you may pick up some free power by having a play:)

  Cubes said:
Carl,

Loose the attitude. I simply stated it 'may' have trouble pulling more than 250rwkw.

The point I was making is GCG is reputable, they make reliable turbos and most know it.

Horsepowerinabox has yet to prove its self, I am unsure where they get their turbo's done, when asked if the 500hp internal gate turbo is the same as the gcg item they stated "its from the same place gcg get their turbo's from"

When I see quotes on a public forum suggesting my business "may" be supplying turbo's put together by butchers.... I tend to take offense in some form.... Horsepowerinabox is built on customer service, good prices and quality product. I can assure you that they are not put together by butchers!!, and I would consider that we do have been around long enough to have laps on the board in the scene.

The GT30 we offer is not intended to rotate the earth on the dyno, it is intended to provide a bolt on option for the T3 RB guys. It is a genuine Australian sourced Garrett turbo with the RB exhaust housing machined to suit by a Garrett Distruibutor. It has the usual 12 month warranty.

I don't want to get into a tennis match of debate here... but I do want to make the point that forums can be damaging to business reputations so please be a little thoughtful on comments relating to businesses. You have every right to shop where you choose and buy from who you choose and trust, but I think the comments are harsh and unjustified in this case.

Regards

Morrie Huckel

Horsepowerinabox.com

My apologies Morrie,

From my understanding when you machine a housing no matter what to some extent the nozzels are butchered anyway. :)

Offer an option for the VG30DET housing and no doubt it will be a stormer, the turbo will then live up to its 500hp rating, well close to anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...