Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I get asked this question all the time, so here is how to work out the spring rate using a standard Stagea rear spring;

First remove the spring, then measure the ID of the coil, in this case 88mm;

Measuring_Coil_ID_With_Verniers.jpg

If you don't have a set of verniers then you can use a ruler, yep 88mm;

Measuring_Coil_ID_With_Ruler.jpg

Always measure the other end, some coils are conical, in this case 79mm;

Measuring_Coil_ID.jpg

Then measure the OD of the wire, in this case 12 mm;

Measuring_Wire_OD_Verniers.jpg

If you don't have a set of verniers then you can use a spanner, simply select the right size spanner, yep 12mm.

Measuring_Wire_OD_Spanner.jpg

Last job, count the numbers of coils, this one has 9 and a bit coils, let's call it 9.125 coils;

Count_the_Coils.jpg

Then post up the numbers in this thread for Sydneykid to work out the spring rate like this;

Coil ID = 88/79 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.125 turns

Spring rate = 181 lbs/inch (3.327 kg/mm)

I will pop onto this thread every few days (sorry not every day) and calculate any spring rates that are posted.

Happy spring rate checking

D: cheers :mad:

Edited by Sydneykid
  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Some people want to know the spring rates without removing the coils from the car. It a little more tricky and the results are not as accurate, but here is how it is done. Yes, I know this one is on the floor, but use your imagination that it is still mounted in the car.

First measure the lower OD of the coil, this is hard to do without verniers as the shock shaft gets in the way of a ruler. You can buy cheap plastic verniers from SupaCheap, AutoOne, AutoBarn, AutoPro etc for a $few that will do this job accurately enough. In this case 112mm;

Measuring_Coil_OD_Verniers.jpg

Then measure the upper OD of the coil, in this case 103 mm;

Measuring_Coil_OD_Top_Verniers.jpg

As usual measure the wire OD, in this case 12mm (yes, you can use the spanner trick here as well);

Measuring_Coil_ID_in_Car.jpg

Then count the coils, in this case 9.125;

Count_the_Coils_in_car.jpg

Then post up the numbers in this thread for Sydneykid to work out the spring rate like this;

Coil OD = 112/103 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.125 turns

Spring rate = 181 lbs/inch (3.327 kg/mm)

I will pop onto this thread every few days (sorry not every day) and calculate any spring rates that are posted.

Happy spring rate checking :mad:

Edited by Sydneykid

Curious.. well I have some rear springs sitting here.. well known brand.. they will fit r32 gts-t shocks I think, but not sure whether they are reasonable option.

ID: 76/76mm

Wire O/D: 11mm

Coils: 10.5mm

Spring Rate = ???

All are via steel ruler, so maybe a little inaccure

Want to give guessing the brand a try? :D

Curious.. well I have some rear springs sitting here.. well known brand.. they will fit r32 gts-t shocks I think, but not sure whether they are reasonable option.  

ID: 76/76mm

Wire O/D: 11mm

Coils: 10.5mm

Spring Rate = ???

All are via steel ruler, so maybe a little inaccure

Want to give guessing the brand a try? :D

Coils: 10.5mm??

If that is 10.5 turns

Spring rate is 142 lbs/inch - 2.5 kg/mm

:(

yes, sorry 10.5 turns..

approximately 142lbs/inch .. almost seem a little too soft compared to your suggested "optimal" 200lbs/inch rate for gts-t so might not use them.. although they seem quite firm compared to my stock springs (probably long dead at 15 years old :))

They are Kings.. KDRL-10's.. I was thinking the spring rate must be the only difference between the S13 because fit wise similar I've been told between s13 rears and R32 (?). Proper R32 GTS-T springs are listed as KDRL-101's.

Pretty sure i measured ok..

Upper OD : 96mm

Lower OD : 98mm

Wire OD   : 13mm

# of coils  : 7.65 (cusco's are a little weird)

Thanks SK

You might wanna check that coil OD, 96/98mm top and bottom is not normal.

But if it is right, they are 465 lbs/inch (8.3kg/mm).

The more common is 75 mm ID (ie; 101 mm OD), that gives 400 lbs /inch (7.2 kg/mm).

..how would this spring rate be on an r33 gts-t.

Too harsh for me, hope it isn't a rear spring.

They are cusco adjustable coilovers

Well, I could have guessed they would be some Japanese brand.

:rant:

How close is 335 pounds/inch.:)

Quick question though. How accurate is this method considering the different properties of steel used and forms of heat treatment etc?  5%, 10%?

Hi Roy, I am not a metalurgist, so pardon me if this is excessively simplistic. The Japanese, German and Australian standards for automotive spring steel are basically same for the 2 types, hot wind and cold wind. The hardening and tempering requirements are obviously different, but the end result is very closely aligned. The program I work with utilises the base data from the BHP coil winding standard, so it is very accurate. If the coil spring manufacture has adhered to either of the 3 standards, then the end result is very predicatable. Garbage in, garbage out obviously applies.

The simulation program is used by OE spring manufactures for HSV, Holden and Mitsubishi, Ford have their own in house program as far as I know. But I have checked hundreds of Ford springs and the simulation is still accurate. Obviously it does far more than work out the spring rate, but I am only using that part for this thread.

;)

PS; 335 lbs per inch:confused: AAAhh, you have to subtract the wire OD twice from the coil OD to get the coil ID. Yes?

LOL...i was using coil centre diameter instead of ID. But even still the equation im usinf doenst seem to be as accurate.;)

I tried to work it out last year when i had those problems with my front springs. Good thing im selling my car and not looking for springs:innocent:

What would be the most livable spring rate for an R34 GTT which see 20,000 kilometers of every day driving per year, the occasional track day?

I have Whiteline coils in now, and I'm looking at a set of D2 Coil Overs.

The spring rate that I have now is okay for me.

Thanks

Pete

What would be the most livable spring rate for an R34 GTT which see 20,000 kilometers of every day driving per year, the occasional track day?

I have Whiteline coils in now, and I'm looking at a set of D2 Coil Overs.

The spring rate that I have now is okay for me.

Thanks

Pete

Hi Pete, why do you want to change if the spring rate you have now is OK for you? Shocks? Stick some Bilsteins in there? Height? Add the extra circlip grooves.

;)

Yeah, I added the extra circlip groove, the height is right, but now the back end squeeks like a pig!

I think the rear springs are just out of their preload length. I have been meaning to put some rubber in there somewhere but have never got around to it.

Bass Junky... I got my whiteline kit rear springs rattle like crazy since day 1. Had the installers to wrap insulation tapes around the coils particularly the top section where the coil wounds closer (progressive rate springs). Solved the problem. Still rattle when I trail-brake from hi speed e.g. 100km/h to 80km/h on a bumpy 2nd class rural highway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...