Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does any 1 want to share there Inj map so that I can have a quick gander at what they used as a target AFR's across the board?

Would I be correct in saying that every car would need a slightly different airflow curve?But for the most part the target afr or inj map would stay pretty much the same. For example my car is a neo RB3025 with a GT3576 and z32 AFM. it would have a different airflow requirements to a RB25 with a GT3576 and z32 AFM due to the extra capacity. But the fuel map would be quite similar.

I obviously did it the other way by using the standard airflow curve and tuning the inj map to compensate. So once I get the idea through my head of how it works, I might start slightly tweaking it via the airflow curve.

regards

Chris

Chris im pretty sure ive posted up a few in tuning threads before, the target afr map or target injection ms table is tweaked between different engines and turbos and obviuosly fuels, but yes in broader terms it is very similar.

If I send you my tune can you have a look at it and if possible make any suitable adjustments? I am happy to $ for your work if you believe you can make a difference. It seems sloppy in the lower range. If you are able to, PM me.

Sorry ive turned off pm's as i rarely get screen time nowadays. feel free to email it to me info@chequeredtuning.com with mods and car type. I wil look at it for you for free, as for changing it i will see how it looks first, and maybe make sugestions, do you have WB logging?

An easy way to see if your tune is pretty poor is the color grading in the map, if it doesnt smothly blend colours it needs work.

here are two examples the top one is a real map, see the large steps and troughs.... this is all bad for driveability etc. Compare the second map to the original to get an idea of what im getting at. (please understand the touched up one is dramtised a bit to make it more obvious). :P

post-34927-1257679069_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1257679085_thumb.jpg

The top map was tweaked to remove the steps and troughs only and this was the reply from that UK customer "Car Feels really good mate, never felt the car as powerful as that before and was only getting between 22-30 knock"

Smoothness is paramount for driveability

EDIT: found the thread, save these files as .DAT and you can compare the before and after to get the jist of my ramblings. (ignore the fuel map though as it was to dangerous to rewrite a UK based car with no WB, its cleaned up not rewritten to target afrs from memory)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/295349-can-somone-with-datalogit-check-my-map-please/page__p__4924793__hl__map+smooth__fromsearch__1#entry4924793

Sorry ive turned off pm's as i rarely get screen time nowadays. feel free to email it to me info@chequeredtuning.com with mods and car type. I wil look at it for you for free, as for changing it i will see how it looks first, and maybe make sugestions, do you have WB logging?

An easy way to see if your tune is pretty poor is the color grading in the map, if it doesnt smothly blend colours it needs work.

here are two examples the top one is a real map, see the large steps and troughs.... this is all bad for driveability etc. Compare the second map to the original to get an idea of what im getting at. (please understand the touched up one is dramtised a bit to make it more obvious). :P

post-34927-1257679069_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1257679085_thumb.jpg

The top map was tweaked to remove the steps and troughs only and this was the reply from that UK customer "Car Feels really good mate, never felt the car as powerful as that before and was only getting between 22-30 knock"

Smoothness is paramount for driveability

EDIT: found the thread, save these files as .DAT and you can compare the before and after to get the jist of my ramblings. (ignore the fuel map though as it was to dangerous to rewrite a UK based car with no WB, its cleaned up not rewritten to target afrs from memory)

http://www.skylinesa..._1#entry4924793

I downloaded the tune and had a quick squiz at it and it does look very uniform and tidy. I can see alot of work went into the AF table too. You have email!

Curious why everyone likes a totally ruler flat A/F...

I tend to richen up my tunes at maximum break torque when the cylinder temps are at their greatest

Also I don't see many people dial in a few more degrees once the torque decays pinch.gif

Curious why everyone likes a totally ruler flat A/F...

I tend to richen up my tunes at maximum break torque when the cylinder temps are at their greatest

Also I don't see many people dial in a few more degrees once the torque decays pinch.gif

Put simply you never give gold away for free.... and as such a mail order free touch up is no where near an in house dyno derived tune... as one needs to compensate for a myriad of things.

thats why i said (please understand the touched up one is dramatised a bit to make it more obvious) and (ignore the fuel map though as it was to dangerous to rewrite a UK based car with no WB, its cleaned up not rewritten to target afrs from memory)

but your post above is correct, most of our tunes dont have flat af curves and definately have a non linear timing line. Most go up, some go up down up... all the benefits of live tuning.

It seems these days the general consensus is ruler flat af on boost is a good tune.

I've seen many times people give only credit to af ratios that are ruler flat.

I must admit before I knew anything about tuning I thought the same.

We need a tuning sub forum!

It seems these days the general consensus is ruler flat af on boost is a good tune.

I've seen many times people give only credit to af ratios that are ruler flat.

I must admit before I knew anything about tuning I thought the same.

We need a tuning sub forum!

Hmmmm wait till you start tuning engines that can continuously move inlet cams or even both inlet and exhaust. Then add variable runner length and direct injection into the equation. You'll start to realize that you know very little about tuning.

I thought I knew tuning quiet well until I talked to a former gm calibration/ experimental combustion engineer.

Hmmmm wait till you start tuning engines that can continuously move inlet cams or even both inlet and exhaust. Then add variable runner length and direct injection into the equation. You'll start to realize that you know very little about tuning.

I thought I knew tuning quiet well until I talked to a former gm calibration/ experimental combustion engineer.

I would love to talk to the guy who tuned the Saab variable compression turbo engine.

Would hate to think what is involved there

Hey Trent, cheers for pointing me in the direction of that tune. It was very handy to compare how others have set it out.

I copied the fuel map to experiement with but I think I may have found another issue that I was over looking. When it's making full boost it doesn't seem to be richening up as much as it should be so I think the craptacular walbro fuel pump is running out of flow. But I'll confirm that soon but I hope not cos I really really don't wanna have to strip my stereo out to get access to it.

easiest way to check that is a fuel pressure gauge, any decent dyno will have a mechanical one handy.

if not, you can remove the fuel rail return at the tank return and run it into a bucket. If you get no fuel at max torque/boost, the pump is not up to scratch

Yeah true, thats exactly how I was gonna test it. like you said with a bucket and apply 20psi to the pressure reg with my air compressor. if nothing or only a little comes out I know theres some thing wrong.

That won't work bud.

Injectors need to be running etc

I do realize that there would a portion of fuel that would no be getting consumed by the motor. But what it would tell me is if the fuel pump is almost stalling at those pressures at the very least. unfortunatly I don't have a dyno in my shed, but good point on the remote fuel pressure gauge. That is something that I do have. sounds like a job for when I return from work in India with my nice new 260 poncams.

So I did a simple test by just setting the bottom 6x6 of the map to 9:1 from around 11.5 and it dropped the AFR's from 12.4 to about 11. So the fuel pump might just be ok. but will do a proper test later on.

I think I just needed to be more agressive with airflow curve above 3.5v

I got my wideband today. Just fiddling with it, my idle was around 11.3. I went to lean it out a little and in the FC Edit, I had to set my cell for that idle cell close to 17, almost 18 just to get the engine close to stoich... Why are they so far out?

What is a good idle afr? Does anyone have a target AFR for the whole board? I am thinking of retuning my whole injector map by resetting my tune, adjusting injector settings for my nismos, setting the afm to z32 and then copying my whole ignition map across and dropping ignition by a couple degrees then richening up the ignition table and start adjusting. Good or bad start?

its probly the same reason my target afr's were odd. set the cells on your injection map where the car idle's to 14.7. Then open the monitor screen and check the Airflow meter voltage at idle. Now once you know what the AFM voltage is go to tab 3 where you will see the airflow curve's. IF z32 is third AFM selection down then look down at curve 3 which is below it. now scroll across to the corresponding voltage that matchs to what your car does at idle. NOTE* My car idles with a AFM voltage between 1.18 and 1.2volts. now increase the value by a few points and update your pfc while logging with your wide band and keep doing this untill your target AFR is the same or very close to your actuale AFR.

IS that clear as mud?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
    • It's a place for non car talk. There's whoretown which is general shit talking. But also other threads coving all sorts of stuff(a lot still semi car related)
    • Looked it up. It sounds so expensive lmao I'd rather not. Awwwww but I just love that sound
    • If you want the screaming "weeeee" sound, just let the gasket between the exhaust manifold and the turbo break a little. It'll go "weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" everytime its on boost...
×
×
  • Create New...