Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just remember, when warming up a car, you shouldn't be looking at the water temp. You should be looking at the oil pressure.

I set the 50c to 1 and forget about it. Those corrections are a pain in the bum. A lot of the drift guys here like to run 70c thermostats.

Yes well at the risk of splitting hairs I think the whole idea of cold enrichment is to make up for cold pistons chambers and valves absorbing initially a lot of combustion heat wchich pulls down the combustion temps and combustion pressure . More fuel means in theory more heat and when the internals heat up they don't rob as much heat from the combustion process .

I don't think the extra fuel is there to overcome cold oil drag unless the oil is a high viscosity dino oil and the outside temp is very cold .

For the record I just changed to Rotella 4T which is a 5w40 and I get no starting issues with EFlex E70 and the Datalogig showing around 10 deg water temp .

I just highly doubt coolant temps in the mid 70s indicate that an engine would need extra fuel .

Yes and I was wondering about those who chose to run cooler than std thermostats because in cold thempratures their engines may not even get to 80c .

A .

marketing gimmick? oil needs to be at around 90 degrees to perform at its best, and like I mentioned before about the water/oil heat exchanger it's there for a reason to warm up the oil.

anybody running big cams on a 2.6 have their 'Accel vs TPS1' settings handy? Accelerate injector would be good too.

I'm getting a bad lean hesitation with a throttle stab near idle, and I can't seam to cure it with those settings. Only thing that works is to add fuel to the INJ table.

Edited by black bnr32

I think the heat exchanger is there to warm and cool but I suspect it has a say in cold start and warm up exhaust emissions and that what probably drove Nissan to provide it .

You'd think GTRs would have gotten oil radiators like Evos did but they got exchangers AFAIK too . Doubt the racers had exchangers .

A .

anybody running big cams on a 2.6 have their 'Accel vs TPS1' settings handy? Accelerate injector would be good too.

I'm getting a bad lean hesitation with a throttle stab near idle, and I can't seam to cure it with those settings. Only thing that works is to add fuel to the INJ table.

hard to trade that table, unless someone has same cams, same injectors....

richen up the a/f on idle see if that helps.. I find cars that I've played around with running longer duration cams do not like stoich on idle

hard to trade that table, unless someone has same cams, same injectors....

richen up the a/f on idle see if that helps.. I find cars that I've played around with running longer duration cams do not like stoich on idle

It actually idles nicely. Its the large throttle inputs right after idle that are a problem.

  • 2 weeks later...

Black bn- if. Have an oversized theottle body it may be hard to get off idle throttle stabs correct,

Just have a play with the accell settings. Keep adding accell too see if it likes it

An RB26 would be very different with its individual throttles because the rise in manifold pressure would be fast and you need to toss a fair bit of fuel in to keep a reasonable AFR .

Its take a bit of getting head around but these computers have a unique idle setting state if you did the idle learning properly and you don't seem to get access to this even with Datalogit , not sure if you do with Apexis software .

I'm finding that you need to play around with the injection and timing tables just off idle where it changes to these map settings .

Its interesting to watch Datalogit in log mode so you know exactly where the engine is live .

I think its a juggle of how much innitial fuel comes from the accel settings and how much from the fuel table . ATM I have things a little richer in the 400 800 1200 areas while further up I leaned out the upper cells and pulled a bit of timing out to stop it popping on the overrun . I find the more you can get using the fuel table the better the consumption tends to be but don't forget to play around with timing settings as well .

I think there's limits to what can be done without a dyno and someone who knows what these engines like where timing wise .

A .

Oops didnt read it was rb26.

thanks anyways, and yes i played with the accel settings quite a bit, but had no luck. ended up adding fuel to the base map. not a huge deal as this is a race car

Edited by black bnr32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...