Jump to content
SAU Community

33GTSt How much boost can you run?

PHATGTR

By PHATGTR,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
well thats up to you guys to believe that but thats what the dyno sheet says and i haven't seen one that has lied before

Lol Many dyno sheets have lied before... There are dynos out there which are just plain inaccurate & there's also ways to cheat / fake dyno readings. They can involve messing with the AT & IT temps for a starter. Sorry dude but theres no other way to break it you you... There is no way your car is making 729 Nm based on the fact its 2L & running 16psi. 210rwkw sounds right, but 729 for Nm T is way off.

Maybe try to listen & learn what we're trying to explain to you instead of telling us we're wrong or being so certain you're right ‘with no facts to back your theory up other than "Dynos dont lie" :rofl:'.

:P

someonestolecc Grand Master

someonestolecc

Posted
Posted

Stop hi jacking this guys thread. It's called tractive effort and there's plenty of info why it's not always correct and how it works. Torque is a figure based from rpm and kw anyways so you can always work it out yourself.

My sr20 has around 650nm of torque according to the dyno. Big deal.

NA_R33 Grand Master

NA_R33

Posted
Posted
Lol Many dyno sheets have lied before... There are dynos out there which are just plain inaccurate & there's also ways to cheat / fake dyno readings.  They can involve messing with the AT & IT temps for a starter.  Sorry dude but theres no other way to break it you you... There is no way your car is making 729 Nm based on the fact its 2L & running 16psi.  210rwkw sounds right, but 729 for Nm is way off.

Maybe try to listen & learn what we're trying to explain to you instead of telling us we're wrong or being so certain you're right ‘with no facts to back your theory up other than "Dynos dont lie" :rofl:'.

:P

Maybe you should go learn about tractive effort mate... its not torque.. and what the dyno has told him is more then correct for tractive effort.. do some research before you go arguing with people. I have had this debate about torque and tractive effort so many times before its not funny so im not even gonna bother try explaining it, research it for yourself. In first gear my car makes over 2000NM's of tractive effort on the dyno.. its not wrong nor is it incorrect.

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
Maybe you should go learn about tractive effort mate... its not torque.. and what the dyno has told him is more then correct for tractive effort.. do some research before you go arguing with people. I have had this debate about torque and tractive effort so many times before its not funny so im not even gonna bother try explaining it, research it for yourself. In first gear my car makes over 2000NM's of tractive effort on the dyno.. its not wrong nor is it incorrect.

Yeh I get the different between the two. I was correct to say he doesnt have that much Nm in Torque. We're just talking about being specific here. I think people seen 729NM on their dyno sheet & think that comparable to say the Nm reading you'll see in Motor mags where they're actually at the fly & true figures to the engines Torque. So to say you have 729 NM torque is incorrect. If he corrects that to 729 Nm Tractive Effort in say 4th Gear well it's all good then isnt it. Why bother to even say you have XXX Nm based of your dyno sheet without specifying what gear it was pulled in also, without stating the gear it hold's no importance really. There's a quite a difference between say 3rd & 4th gear. & like you said, put it into 1st & that figure jumps sky high.

http://www22.brinkster.com/badgermotorspor/Dyno.html

wheels_24 Collaborator

wheels_24

Posted
Posted

well it was in 4th gear and i wasn't the one who started this you did i am only going on what i have been told and what my dyno tells me. I don't need to go and do any research cause i am not that fused with the topic. It seems that geno8r is so but, and someonestolecc is correct you have just made a depate in someone else's thread

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
well it was in 4th gear and i wasn't the one who started this you did i am only going on what i have been told and what my dyno tells me. I don't need to go and do any research cause i am not that fused with the topic. It seems that geno8r is so but, and someonestolecc is correct you have just made a depate in someone else's thread

Yep explanation over... It's been explained to you that you have 729 Nm of Tractive Effort in 4th & not 729Nm T. Whether you keep your sig "729 Nm T" or not is your choice. I Just thought if someone was displaying something false they might want to be informed & learn something new? I think it’s good if some1 can explain something to me properly if I’m wrong, I spose I just like to learn & grow from the experience. Isn’t that a major factor of car forums, learn something new. Ehhh over anyways now. Enjoy your “729 Nm T” beast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Murray_Calavera
      HKS stroker kit step 0/1 or HKS GTIII 2530

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Shoota_77
      R32 GTS-t RB30 sedan

      By Shoota_77 · Posted

      Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • joshuaho96
      HKS stroker kit step 0/1 or HKS GTIII 2530

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • r32-25t
      HKS stroker kit step 0/1 or HKS GTIII 2530

      By r32-25t · Posted

      At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • joshuaho96
      HKS stroker kit step 0/1 or HKS GTIII 2530

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...