Jump to content
SAU Community

33GTSt How much boost can you run?

PHATGTR

By PHATGTR,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
well thats up to you guys to believe that but thats what the dyno sheet says and i haven't seen one that has lied before

Lol Many dyno sheets have lied before... There are dynos out there which are just plain inaccurate & there's also ways to cheat / fake dyno readings. They can involve messing with the AT & IT temps for a starter. Sorry dude but theres no other way to break it you you... There is no way your car is making 729 Nm based on the fact its 2L & running 16psi. 210rwkw sounds right, but 729 for Nm T is way off.

Maybe try to listen & learn what we're trying to explain to you instead of telling us we're wrong or being so certain you're right ‘with no facts to back your theory up other than "Dynos dont lie" :rofl:'.

:P

someonestolecc Grand Master

someonestolecc

Posted
Posted

Stop hi jacking this guys thread. It's called tractive effort and there's plenty of info why it's not always correct and how it works. Torque is a figure based from rpm and kw anyways so you can always work it out yourself.

My sr20 has around 650nm of torque according to the dyno. Big deal.

NA_R33 Grand Master

NA_R33

Posted
Posted
Lol Many dyno sheets have lied before... There are dynos out there which are just plain inaccurate & there's also ways to cheat / fake dyno readings.  They can involve messing with the AT & IT temps for a starter.  Sorry dude but theres no other way to break it you you... There is no way your car is making 729 Nm based on the fact its 2L & running 16psi.  210rwkw sounds right, but 729 for Nm is way off.

Maybe try to listen & learn what we're trying to explain to you instead of telling us we're wrong or being so certain you're right ‘with no facts to back your theory up other than "Dynos dont lie" :rofl:'.

:P

Maybe you should go learn about tractive effort mate... its not torque.. and what the dyno has told him is more then correct for tractive effort.. do some research before you go arguing with people. I have had this debate about torque and tractive effort so many times before its not funny so im not even gonna bother try explaining it, research it for yourself. In first gear my car makes over 2000NM's of tractive effort on the dyno.. its not wrong nor is it incorrect.

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
Maybe you should go learn about tractive effort mate... its not torque.. and what the dyno has told him is more then correct for tractive effort.. do some research before you go arguing with people. I have had this debate about torque and tractive effort so many times before its not funny so im not even gonna bother try explaining it, research it for yourself. In first gear my car makes over 2000NM's of tractive effort on the dyno.. its not wrong nor is it incorrect.

Yeh I get the different between the two. I was correct to say he doesnt have that much Nm in Torque. We're just talking about being specific here. I think people seen 729NM on their dyno sheet & think that comparable to say the Nm reading you'll see in Motor mags where they're actually at the fly & true figures to the engines Torque. So to say you have 729 NM torque is incorrect. If he corrects that to 729 Nm Tractive Effort in say 4th Gear well it's all good then isnt it. Why bother to even say you have XXX Nm based of your dyno sheet without specifying what gear it was pulled in also, without stating the gear it hold's no importance really. There's a quite a difference between say 3rd & 4th gear. & like you said, put it into 1st & that figure jumps sky high.

http://www22.brinkster.com/badgermotorspor/Dyno.html

wheels_24 Collaborator

wheels_24

Posted
Posted

well it was in 4th gear and i wasn't the one who started this you did i am only going on what i have been told and what my dyno tells me. I don't need to go and do any research cause i am not that fused with the topic. It seems that geno8r is so but, and someonestolecc is correct you have just made a depate in someone else's thread

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
well it was in 4th gear and i wasn't the one who started this you did i am only going on what i have been told and what my dyno tells me. I don't need to go and do any research cause i am not that fused with the topic. It seems that geno8r is so but, and someonestolecc is correct you have just made a depate in someone else's thread

Yep explanation over... It's been explained to you that you have 729 Nm of Tractive Effort in 4th & not 729Nm T. Whether you keep your sig "729 Nm T" or not is your choice. I Just thought if someone was displaying something false they might want to be informed & learn something new? I think it’s good if some1 can explain something to me properly if I’m wrong, I spose I just like to learn & grow from the experience. Isn’t that a major factor of car forums, learn something new. Ehhh over anyways now. Enjoy your “729 Nm T” beast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • joshuaho96
      R32 update from 1990's spec.

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Wideband is worth setting up if only for tuning purposes. I would not mess with the ignition system unless there's a misfire. HKS crank trigger is popular out here for the relatively easily sourced Denso crank sensor, not a bad idea to install as well regardless of power level on a standalone. Boost leak test is worth thinking about. Oil pressure sensor tied to a fuel cut isn't a bad idea either. Getting the tune figured out is a good idea. Without putting eyes on it and getting under it there's no way for us to tell you exactly what it needs but most likely you're down to the last 10% that will make a big, big difference in how happy you are with the car.
    • PotatoCake
      Has anyone put in brand new full carpet? (not floor mats)

      By PotatoCake · Posted

      Doing a refresh of my 33 and can see a few websites stating they sell the entire main carpet for our cars, but they all have generic photos which is fine, i understand they are custom made to order.  Just seeing if anyone has got it done or had any experience with this, as i would only want to do it if the fit and finish was as good as oem https://carmatsdirect.com.au/products/moulded-carpet-or-vinyl-for-nissan-skyline-r33-1993-1998-coupe https://knoxautocarpets.com.au/moulded-carpets/nissan/skyline/skyline-r-33-1993-1998/
    • MBS206
      R32 update from 1990's spec.

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Any plans for E85? If so, add flex fuel sensor.   I'd probably add in the sensors I mentioned above if the Link will support using them for engine protection. With water pressure, you need to be able to effectively set it that "If temp > X, and pressure = atmospheric, shutdown" as at running temp, you should be able to read pressure in the cooling system. If pressure suddenly disappears, it means the water went some where, and this is a quicker reaction than waiting on water temp to go up (Which, can take a little longer than you'd like, considering it now has to wait for hot air to heat it up) Oil pressure, Oil temp, both would be on my list too if you're looking to add sensors. Wideband O2. And at least one EGT sensor. If you're feeling deluxe, put in individual runner EGTs. Single EGT sensor is more so forget about a specific number, get used to "What is normal EGTs", and then keep an eye on it, if it starts going away from "normal" it's a sign something is wrong (Also, things like the tune can still start going out of spec, but EGTs may not show it, for example one injector starts running leaning, so ECU richens everything up, now 5 out of 6 cylinders are rich, and running cool, with one cylinder lean and running hotter, so it's not perfect) Then there is your other things to look at non sensor related, but you may have already done, or have underway, and that would be things like building a sump for more oil, and better oil control under high G-Forces (Cornering, brakes, acceleration). Basically, the above is worth looking/thinking about, if the ECU can do protective stuff with it, and you continue to use it how you are (Drive it to the track, thrash it, drive home, repeat once every 3 to 4 months)
    • Ty1
      Hicas ball joint install tool

      By Ty1 · Posted

      Can also confirm these work a treat for most balljoints and bushes. If you have access to a big rattle gun, they make the job so much easier and quicker, compared to using a socket wrench or shifter on the c-clamp 👍
    • djr81
      R32 update from 1990's spec.

      By djr81 · Posted

      Its sort of street but got used for circuit sprints on account of I never drive it on the road because I dont have the time to spare. So it usage was sits around for months at a time then gets driven either 50 or 250 kms to the track followed by 20 laps followed by 50 or 250kms home followed by stuck in the shed until next time. So yeah neither fish nor fowl. Just dont want to break it on the track as a preference. Hence the fairly short sensor/mod list. Probably more worried about it pinging itself to destruction more so than anything oil related.
×
×
  • Create New...