Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK boys and girls - I have a math quiz for you all

I have just had a power run done on my R32 GTR and have a reading for tractive effort, and I want to convert that to an approximate torque figure (Nm)

from the following web site

http://www.webster-inst.com/techinfo/equat...eqnfr/eqn17.htm

we see that the tractive effort is obtained by multiplying the torque by the total ratio of power the train and dividing this sum by the rolling radius of the driving tyres. (easy)

TE = (T * R * 1000) / r

where

T= Motor torque in kg/millimetres (the number I wish to calculate)

R = Overall gear reduction including both axle and transmission (NFI)

r = Rolling radius of loaded driving tyre in millimetres (measure)

So in my example, I have a measured TE of 6300 newtons – based on the output of the power run on a 4 wheel dyno.

BUT

I do not know R or r

Any idea what the overall gear reduction is in an R32 GTR in 4th gear.

Any idea how a can obtain an accurate measure of the rolling radius of my wheel. I have 235/45/17s (with a tape measure I get 2070mm ?)

come on guys – I'm sure this must have been covered before

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/79685-convert-tractive-effort-to-torque/
Share on other sites

found another formula

T = (9.545 * Power in watts) / RPM

so I get

T = ( 9.545 * (291.7awkw * 1000) / 6500RPM = 428Nm

A more realistic result - but I still have ZERO idea is this is even in the ball park.

A std GenIII V8 reports 475Nm with 255kw and the New Gen4 GTO reports 530Nm with 297kw (these will be @ the engine numbers tho )

I think r = the way you have measured it ie half the diameter. that would make sense.

As for gear reduction, as far as I know it's not just final drive ie 4.11 as you have to take the effect of the gearbox ratio into account. What I'm not sure of is the way you combine these - presumably by dividing or multiplying - although a google search might help. Or just ring a uni engineering faculty and ask, that sometimes works.

I think the second formula looks like it might be OK, they're torquey little suckers.

Good luck

Regards

Actually that 3000 odd figure is Newton Millimetres so thats even stonger! :confused:

We have taken in to account the gearbox, he said 4th gear, and that's 1:1, 1 engine revolution = 1 tail shaft revolution. So we can ignore it.

The problems in the radius bit i think too.

Wouldn't it be easier to convert your horsepower to torque using the rpm?  :confused:

You can do it this way, but i wouldn't use horsepower, i'd stay in metric units to make it easier.

Torque is also a power multiplied by an angular velocity, so if you look on a dyno graph the power should be simply the torque multiplied by the rpm times some conversion factor based on the gear the car is in and the radius of the cars wheels.

... the rolling radius of my wheel. I have 235/45/17s (with a tape measure I get 2070mm ?)
That's the rolling CIRCUMFERENCE! Rolling radius will be:

(17* 25.4 + 235 * .45 * 2) /2

(approx 321 mm)

ok what the conversion for ftlb to newtons

as mine made 410ft/lb on 275/35/18 at about 6500rpm is high torque point and hold around 400 for about 2000rpm. And made 529.4rwhp

R=324.85mm

6500 = ( T * 4.111 * 1000) / 324.85 ) = 513.6Nm

does this sound right

pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...