Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Waz, you shouldnt be talking about beating a stock VT, thats a given. Try beat a Gen3, then that will give you trouble ;)

gen3 is an engine type, so a stock V8 VT does have a gen3 under its bonnet...

not trouble, well not the ones i have 'seen'

maybe its just that the average VT driver is a bit older and not that great with the manual shifter. after all mine's an auto and easier to launch and drive consistently

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This thread is really a greed over car choice, you want to get a fast car do drag your mate. Does it really matter if you can beat your mate in a car? Maybe injuring yourself and him?

If you buy a car, especially at a young age (your first car) make sure that its not for stupidity and only for daily purpose. (I'd say get a supra, i think the power shows more towards the top speed rather then take off, so while still being a fast car not a quick takeoff that will kill you. RZ n/a for the win!) Goodluck ;)

did i say it would be standard? have you ever seen a completely standard import? my response assumed it would have an exhaust of some sort

Every car that comes in under SEVS has to be made "standard". So all R33s coming into the country now are standard.

i challenge you to find a "standar" R33 gts-t anyways.... one that has not been modified to any extent at all, that is completely and exactly the way it came from the factory...... i doubt u'd be able to do it.

mine is 95% standard, only thing changed is cat back 3" exhaust. That is it - otherwise completely stock standard. No boost changes, nothing.. no airpod..

I think you should go and test drive all the cars, work out which one you like the most.. don't buy something "just cos it goes 0.3 seconds faster".. buy it cost you like it, it's fast, it's got what you want, it's comfy.. you can always modify it later easily catching whatever other car you might have bought.

personally, I wouldn't get a supra - because for $20,000 (which an N/A '94 model is going to cost you) you can get a '96/'97 SII r33 or even a '89 R32 gtr..

that and supra's have to have the CRAPPEST boot ever made - also ppl before flaming me, I was looking at getting one of these, still think they are better looking cars.. but I can't beat my '98 gts-t.. just love it..

LOL...I know its a Skyline website but it still amuses me how people will overate standard Skylines sometimes, a standard auto GENIII VT would cream a standard auto R33 GTsT :rant:

My TJ 3.5 Auto Magna would cream a Standard R33 auto GTsT :)

Fair point but people have also underated them like yourself the skyline VT gen3 standard and GTST standard would be very close. 220kw vs 187 and the skyline has a hell of a lot less weight look up the manufactures 0-100km and 0-400m times they are very close. As for your magna auto beating an auto r33 gtst you are dreeming. I doubt you would even beat an auto GTS especialy if it had the rb25de.

For those wanting to know about completely stock GTS-Ts..I have one. No exaust, No after market filter. It did a 14.6 0-400m on a Gtech. It also has the active diff if that makes a difference? I dont know as I have never driven any other skyline. Won't be stock long though as I just bought an exaust and intercooler :uh-huh:

mine is 95% standard, only thing changed is cat back 3" exhaust. That is it - otherwise completely stock standard. No boost changes, nothing.. no airpod..

so its not stock standard then...

last time i checked, an exhaust was a modification

My gf has a R33 GTS (non turbo) 2.5litre

My old car was a VR Calais 3.8litre v6... i had exaust/air filter etc... she has exaust air filter..

My calais was a tiny bit quicker than hers from when we both gunned it, but it was pretty close , and my calais was pretty quick compared to other v6 commodores around, quicker than my parents stock VT v6 at the time.... So it would be pretty close.

Hey are you going to get the gts with the 2.5 or 2.0  

2.0 - 104 kW

2.5 - 143 kW

VT V6 commodore

3.8 - 147

I recon a R33 GTS25 would beat a VT V6 commodore they are a heavy car.

Dont forget the Torque, its not all about the Kw figure. I think the comonwhore has more torque

mine is 95% standard, only thing changed is cat back 3" exhaust. That is it - otherwise completely stock standard. No boost changes, nothing.. no airpod..

i said completely standard, not 95% standard, an exhaust is a mod, therefore it isnt standard.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...