Jump to content
SAU Community

  

75 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

The only goddamn bloody difference between electronic and mechanical gauges, is that in an electronic gauge, the electronic sensor converts the signal from an analog signal to a digital signal, which can then be carried via wires through the firewall up to an electronic unit which converts it back to analog. In a mechanical system, the gauge simply reads whatever pressure level is fed to it.

Imagine having a mechanical oil temp gauge - > and the oil line inside the cabin breaks and you get 80 degree oil poured into your cabin ;)

Electronic Gagues are more accurate and more expensive

Mechanical arent as accurate and are cheaper.

plus depending on the gauge can be dangerous.

if you have the money always go electronic.

mick

that in an electronic gauge, the electronic sensor converts the signal from an analog signal to a digital signal, which can then be carried via wires through the firewall up to an electronic unit which converts it back to analog. In a mechanical system, the gauge simply reads whatever pressure level is fed to it.

Digita signal??? Doesnt it just convert the reading into an analog signal; and then at the control unit reads the signal where a certain voltage equals whatever. I dont think there is a need to convert anything to digital

Most gauges in domestic cars should be electric, therefore reducing the risk of exposure to unwanted stuff like hot oil...

Most performance cars in the states and drag racing use mechanical, with such items as fuel mounted externally under ANDRA regs etc.

The best responsive gauges I have found are mechancial especially with regard to boost. I have always run mechancial in other cars but external mounted, otherwise run full sweep electric (I like Autometre sorry).

Most Jap ones are electric for the reason that they install them inside the ****pit!!!

Is there a reason why you think the mech boost gauges are more accurate. An electric gauge would be able to put the sensor within a few inches of the preessure source meaning that it will react very quickly, whilst the mechanical gauge needs metres of hosing so it can be plumbed up to the gauge....plus surely a diaphragm and voltage signal will be better calibrated/more robust then a mechanical gauge????

Who needs boost gauges anyway..what you dont know cant hurt you:)

mechanical boost is more accruate and responsive as despite the tube being at a distance, the line has a constant pressure. Whereas the electronic measures at intervals and then transmits the data from the sensor to the guage itself. Some electronic ones are good, however I cannot justify $300-$400 for an electronic boost gauge compared to a mechanical when it does the same job. For other uses I would go electronic, such as oil pressure (sometimes it can be beneficial for a mechanical as well in some applications), water temp, oil temp as these do not move in a huge hurry...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree, don't go trusting those trims. As I said, first step is to put the logger away, and do the basics in diagnosis.   I spend plenty of time with data loggers. I also spend plenty of time teaching "technicians" why they need to stop using their data loggers, and learn real diagnostics.   The amount of data logs I play with would probably blow most people away. I don't just use it to diagnose. I log raw CAN data too, as a nice chunk of my job is reverse engineering what automotive manufacturers are doing.
    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
    • Silly question, as I bet you've checked already, but the motor turns over by hand yes? I suspect Neil has a spare starter, though if not, I believe I have a spare R33 (or two) starter.
    • Yeah just run one of those posts to the Link like GTSBoy said. From google it looks like a "mishimoto boost controller" is a manual boost controller. Since you already have the link just buy any MAC valve and plumb it in where the mishimoto is now. Wires to the solenoid should come from the Link's / standard loom boost control wiring (I guess you have an r32, not sure if it is gtst or gtr, if it is GTR where is a 2 pin connector near the engine bay fuse box/injector resistor for that purpose, assuming the standard boost controller is gone)  
    • No. The ECU's hose is for a connetcion between the plenum (assuming single throttle body, not ITBs) and the ECU's internal MAP sensor. This is the primary load measurement of the ECU - so you need to get this one right. This has NOTHING to do with the boost contol. The wastegate also needs to see a boost signal - but it is actually far better for it NOT TO COME FROM THE PLENUM (again, assuming single TB, and not ITBs). This should come from the turbo's compressor housing (assuming there is a nipple on there, which there might well not be), or on the boost pipe somewhere between the turbo and the TB. On the pipe from the turbo to the intercooler is usually most convenient. The boost controller is then located between that boost source and the wastegate, ACCORDING TO THE CORRECT PLUMBING DRAWING FOR THAT BOOST CONTROLLER. There is no general diagram or instruction that will be correct for every case. Then the other ports on the plenum are for purposes such as Duncan described. If the boost controller has an internal MAP sensor, for a boost display, etc, then it will want to be hooked up there, alongside the ECU and the FPR.
×
×
  • Create New...