Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just trying to clarify something.

What is the relationship of the fuel pump and regulator to the injector duty cycle? By this I mean...if a pump starts to fail, does the injectors have more of a duty cycle because they have to open up more to compensate?

Same with the regulator..if pressures down..does that mean the injectors have to open up more?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80783-fuel-pressure-question/
Share on other sites

The duty cycle of the injectors is controlled solely by the ECU, based on information it receives from the various sensors on the engine (temp, air flow, throttle position, etc). The ECU is relying on the pump and regulator to be working "as designed" - it doesn't have any sensor input from them.

The ECU computes the injector opening time based on the info from the sensors, including how much air it has computed is available, and directs the injector to open for a certain time.

This is why engines melt pistons when fuel pumps start to "go off" - the pump can't supply enough pressure, which is the sole determinant of how much fuel gets injected while the injector is open. So the fuel mixture is over-lean (not enough fuel).

So why is my car getting 48% duty cycle at 0.9 bar at 5000rpm then stays at 0.9 bar and goes to 97% as revs go up...which sensors should I be checking?  

Should be 48% all the way

no...as per blind_elk's answer...more revs equals more airflow hence more signal via AFM hence different part of ECU fuel map hence different % of injector duty cycle to provide correct air/fuel ratio. Constant boost pressure does not equate to constant airflow...hope that helps.

Cheers,

Michael

Not really, I have had 2 other cars exactly the same that didn't do it.

The other cars had 1.3 bar of boost at 96%...this one has 0.8-0.9 bar at 96% but only high up in the revs

ok....please try reading the following link

http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-idc.htm

as for the 2 other cars and there duty cycles and different boosts there are too many variables and lack of information to tell you why they were running the duty cycles they were ie: aftermarket mods (fuel system,injectors, type of ECU and tune, obviusly not standard if running 1.3 bar....so Fuel map has been adjusted etc so comparison is illogical.

hope that helps more...

Cheers,

Michael

standard computers and everything on the others...just more boost

your maps basically run the injectors (with small competations for temps etc factored in) and as your revs and load increase you move through the map so if you get high injector duty it's most likely the ecu maps are calling for it to do so .Have you put it on a dyno to see the a/f ratios as by the sounds of it ,it would be getting very rich high in the revs.

pete

1 step backwards - where is all this information / numbers coming from?

Back to your last question - if you are running stock ECU (which I'm guessing you aren't, because they don't give out this sort of info), they are programmed to run richer at the top end, to protect the engine.

mate, it's not wrong. it's just the numbers that are in that fuel map. as to why it's accessing those parts of the map, it could be a number of reasons. get it on a dyno first and see what's happening. you could make your car have 98%duty at 4000rpm if you wanted to on stock boost with just a PFC and some editing of the fuel map. it is not shooting for a target AFR. it's just a number in the map that is causing the injectors to stay open that long.

Problems are that the closest 4wd dyno is 800k's away and like I said, I shouldn't have to tune anything.

I need to clarify a few things......

1. This is an R34GTR?

2. Zero mods, just boost up to 0.9 bar?

3. How many K's?

4. Did this suddenly happen? Or was it always a problem from when it arrived?

It has been my experience that R34's have the most sophisticated of the RB ECU's, they have all sorts of comparison tables for determining problems and protecting the engine via the usual rich and retard mapping. It sounds to me like you have a dud sensor, the Consult interface should tell you which sensor is crook.

:)

PS; you don't have to use a 4wd dyno, just drop the front tailshaft and use a 2wd dyno.

1.yep

2.yep

3.40000

4.Was like that when I got it.

Other 34 owners have confirmed that it should be about 50-60% all the way to 8000rpm

My consult thing says air flow meters ar working fine but I am yet to find out if it is compatable fully with the 34 as I bought it when I had a 33

1.yep

2.yep

3.40000

4.Was like that when I got it.

Other 34 owners have confirmed that it should be about 50-60% all the way to 8000rpm

My consult thing says air flow meters ar working fine but I am yet to find out if it is compatable fully with the 34 as I bought it when I had a 33

AFM's would have been a good guess, easy to check with a multimeter. Just compare the voltages. Doesn't sound like it though. Some stuff I have seen, that causes problems but doesn't always result in an error code;

1. Loose knock sensors, rattle around, give false knock readings, ECU goes R&R to save the engine from non existent pre-ignition damage.

2. Faulty water temp sensor, ECU thinks engine is still cold and runs rich. Should show up on the Consult

3. Faulty Lambda sensor, unlikely to cause this problem but simple to check. Should show up on the Consult

4. Faulty throttle position sensor, ECU thinks throttle is open more than it is, so slips in too much fuel. Should show up on the Consult.

5. Camshaft timing not correct, won't show up on Consult, you have to remove the cam pulley cover and check it.

6. Ignition timing, won't show up on Consult, you have to check it with a timing light.

7. Faulty injector (holding open), won't show up on Consult, you have to remove the plugs and check them, look for one that is noticeably richer than the others.

8 The hardest one is air leaks, more air going in via the AFM's than is actually going into the engine. ECU adds too much fuel for too little air.

Hope that is of some use:cheers:

I got my missus to drive it today with me behind it...she only revved it to like 4000rpm and theres a lot of black smoke...overfuelling heaps. I don't think the timings out as I have done that before on other cars and it changes the whole power characteristics,it drives fine.

If it overfuels, I would be guessing in saying the pump and reg are ok and be looking at injectors and oxygen sensors....agree?????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...