Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The title says it all.

I am looking at buying either one for very similar pricing.

'91 R32 GTR 58000km factory. $29000 ( Black)

'96 R33 GTST 89000km; FMIC, 17 in Lensos, exhaust, BOV for $27500 (Silver)

Both have NSW rego.

This car is to replace my daily and any toy car that I own or wish to own.

So it still needs to be special but retain functionality.

What would you choose?

So in other words a great (stock) car Vs a slightly modded car.

Do those twin turbos really make that much of a difference?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80838-r32-gtr-or-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

You would be crazy to buy the Gts-t! The GTR will rip the mod'd Gts-t to pieces! I a GTR and would never even consider buying a Gts-t if i could afford a GTR! Its not just the twin turbo that makes the car faster its the fact it has the ATTESA 4wd system not to mention so many other bonuses id be here all night typing them out...

Bill,

I own an 90' R32 GTR with 67000ks in it and its pretty much stock. It's great as a daily driver as it an R33 gtst, which my friend owns with similar mods and a PFC. Of the two mine feels more solid in all areas with the flexibility of 4 or 2 wheel drive. In a straight line his gtst gets me with a rolling start only due to his mods and higher boost pressure. The gtst has more urgency mid range to top end, with mine coming on boost sooner and much smoother running out a little right at the top.

It also depends on whether you want to do work on them in the future, GTR (in my slightly tainted oppinion) = more potential!!

Try and drive them both before you make any decisions.

Good luck with the choice.

Get both....yes I'm biased.

If i had to choose between the two, I'd go the GTR for sure, more power, modification potential. GTST R33 is more spacious from inside, but i reckon it looks uglier than my 32.

Plus GTST= RWD fun ALL the time (yes i know u can pull the fuse on GTRs)

Also the 33 GTSTs are wayyyyyyyyy too common these days.

What's that GTST got? It's pretty pricey.

Sure, the gtr may be faster. But it really depends on which on you prefer. 32 gtr looks old on the inside and outside. Condition on the gtr will most likely be a lot worse than the 33.

When I bought my car, I had to make the decision, and I chose the 33. It's just like how people have to choose between r34 gtt and r33 gtr. same price.

At the end of the day, the 33 is 5 years newer.

People keep saying i'd never pay that much for an r33 gtst. That one may be a couple grand overpriced, but in general, people keep saying you can buy an r33 gtst sII for like 18k. yeah, you can, but what condition will it be in?

Sure, the gtr may be faster. But it really depends on which on you prefer. 32 gtr looks old on the inside and outside. Condition on the gtr will most likely be a lot worse than the 33.

When I bought my car, I had to make the decision, and I chose the 33. It's just like how people have to choose between r34 gtt and r33 gtr. same price.

At the end of the day, the 33 is 5 years newer.  

People keep saying i'd never pay that much for an r33 gtst. That one may be a couple grand overpriced, but in general, people keep saying you can buy an r33 gtst sII for like 18k. yeah, you can, but what condition will it be in?

It depends on what he wants himself. In terms of looks its purely subjective, some people can't stand the R33 shape, i.e Boxish, Sedan, others like the R32 shape coz its more aggressive, tougher looking, yet others will say it looks oldish.

If he's thinking performance, then surely the GTR is a better base.

If he wants a newer car, then the GTST s2 is a better choice, or an s15 maybe.

So true, a much newer car and will not go bang on you once you have owned it for a week.  

"The GTR will rip the mod'd Gts-t to pieces"

My experiences say different...

what experiences are these ?

a 33 gtst would have to have some serious money put in to it to challenge even a lightly modded gtr

Man some of those posts are pretty good.

Mainly looking for factory performance. Only mods I would do to the R32 GTR would be front mount, exhaust, BOV. I know how well R33 GTSTs goe with the right mods. Have driven one with 207kw ATW, and that keeps me happy.

I am not too worried about the actual age of the vehicle just the condition. Bith are in a similar condition. VGC.

As for GTRs I would love to get a R32 GTR V spec II.

Man some of those posts are pretty good.

Mainly looking for factory performance. Only mods I would do to the R32 GTR would be front mount, exhaust, BOV. I know how well R33  GTSTs goe with the right mods. Have driven one with 207kw ATW, and that keeps me happy.

I am not too worried about the actual age of the vehicle just the condition. Bith are in a similar condition. VGC.

As for GTRs I would love to get a R32 GTR V spec II.

Don't bother upgrading the cooler on a GTR if your aiming for less than 250kw@wheels and the mods that you've suggested will only get you there if you run about 1.1 bar of boost

that 96 is a rip off . you could get a 98 r34 if you search for that price . then it becomes a different battle .

the r34 is much more modern , much newer , maintainence costs and insurance costs are less , modifications cost less to a degree

the r32 gtr has much more scope for high performance modifications

The R33 is an absolute rip off so if you are comparing those cars then the GTR wins hands down. However if you had the choice of a $17,000 R33 GTS-T and a $27,000 R32 GTR then I would personally go the R33. R33's are newer and look nicer when done right imo. Spend $10,000 on it and you will have a great looking and quick car.

Sup,

If your looking for factory mods and 200rwkw's get you going, then you could look no further then the 33. Newer, better interior, less likley to break etc. Though do you wanna buy a car that just "keeps you happy" or do you want to grow into the car, Neeed that extra power, WANT that 4WD corner exit. =)

- Michael

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
    • I would agree, unless you need something specific to the HV motor/battery side repaired or investigated, any mechanic will be able to perform normal services, but if you prefer, maybe look for a mechanic who regularly services/repairs Nissans, the VQ engines are pretty common in the Nissan lineup.  Sorry, I can't make any suggestions, I don't live in Vic.
    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
×
×
  • Create New...