Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The title says it all.

I am looking at buying either one for very similar pricing.

'91 R32 GTR 58000km factory. $29000 ( Black)

'96 R33 GTST 89000km; FMIC, 17 in Lensos, exhaust, BOV for $27500 (Silver)

Both have NSW rego.

This car is to replace my daily and any toy car that I own or wish to own.

So it still needs to be special but retain functionality.

What would you choose?

So in other words a great (stock) car Vs a slightly modded car.

Do those twin turbos really make that much of a difference?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80838-r32-gtr-or-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

You would be crazy to buy the Gts-t! The GTR will rip the mod'd Gts-t to pieces! I a GTR and would never even consider buying a Gts-t if i could afford a GTR! Its not just the twin turbo that makes the car faster its the fact it has the ATTESA 4wd system not to mention so many other bonuses id be here all night typing them out...

Bill,

I own an 90' R32 GTR with 67000ks in it and its pretty much stock. It's great as a daily driver as it an R33 gtst, which my friend owns with similar mods and a PFC. Of the two mine feels more solid in all areas with the flexibility of 4 or 2 wheel drive. In a straight line his gtst gets me with a rolling start only due to his mods and higher boost pressure. The gtst has more urgency mid range to top end, with mine coming on boost sooner and much smoother running out a little right at the top.

It also depends on whether you want to do work on them in the future, GTR (in my slightly tainted oppinion) = more potential!!

Try and drive them both before you make any decisions.

Good luck with the choice.

Get both....yes I'm biased.

If i had to choose between the two, I'd go the GTR for sure, more power, modification potential. GTST R33 is more spacious from inside, but i reckon it looks uglier than my 32.

Plus GTST= RWD fun ALL the time (yes i know u can pull the fuse on GTRs)

Also the 33 GTSTs are wayyyyyyyyy too common these days.

What's that GTST got? It's pretty pricey.

Sure, the gtr may be faster. But it really depends on which on you prefer. 32 gtr looks old on the inside and outside. Condition on the gtr will most likely be a lot worse than the 33.

When I bought my car, I had to make the decision, and I chose the 33. It's just like how people have to choose between r34 gtt and r33 gtr. same price.

At the end of the day, the 33 is 5 years newer.

People keep saying i'd never pay that much for an r33 gtst. That one may be a couple grand overpriced, but in general, people keep saying you can buy an r33 gtst sII for like 18k. yeah, you can, but what condition will it be in?

  97r33gtst-typeM said:
Sure, the gtr may be faster. But it really depends on which on you prefer. 32 gtr looks old on the inside and outside. Condition on the gtr will most likely be a lot worse than the 33.

When I bought my car, I had to make the decision, and I chose the 33. It's just like how people have to choose between r34 gtt and r33 gtr. same price.

At the end of the day, the 33 is 5 years newer.  

People keep saying i'd never pay that much for an r33 gtst. That one may be a couple grand overpriced, but in general, people keep saying you can buy an r33 gtst sII for like 18k. yeah, you can, but what condition will it be in?

It depends on what he wants himself. In terms of looks its purely subjective, some people can't stand the R33 shape, i.e Boxish, Sedan, others like the R32 shape coz its more aggressive, tougher looking, yet others will say it looks oldish.

If he's thinking performance, then surely the GTR is a better base.

If he wants a newer car, then the GTST s2 is a better choice, or an s15 maybe.

  krzysiu said:
So true, a much newer car and will not go bang on you once you have owned it for a week.  

"The GTR will rip the mod'd Gts-t to pieces"

My experiences say different...

what experiences are these ?

a 33 gtst would have to have some serious money put in to it to challenge even a lightly modded gtr

Man some of those posts are pretty good.

Mainly looking for factory performance. Only mods I would do to the R32 GTR would be front mount, exhaust, BOV. I know how well R33 GTSTs goe with the right mods. Have driven one with 207kw ATW, and that keeps me happy.

I am not too worried about the actual age of the vehicle just the condition. Bith are in a similar condition. VGC.

As for GTRs I would love to get a R32 GTR V spec II.

  RTA 13B said:
Man some of those posts are pretty good.

Mainly looking for factory performance. Only mods I would do to the R32 GTR would be front mount, exhaust, BOV. I know how well R33  GTSTs goe with the right mods. Have driven one with 207kw ATW, and that keeps me happy.

I am not too worried about the actual age of the vehicle just the condition. Bith are in a similar condition. VGC.

As for GTRs I would love to get a R32 GTR V spec II.

Don't bother upgrading the cooler on a GTR if your aiming for less than 250kw@wheels and the mods that you've suggested will only get you there if you run about 1.1 bar of boost

that 96 is a rip off . you could get a 98 r34 if you search for that price . then it becomes a different battle .

the r34 is much more modern , much newer , maintainence costs and insurance costs are less , modifications cost less to a degree

the r32 gtr has much more scope for high performance modifications

The R33 is an absolute rip off so if you are comparing those cars then the GTR wins hands down. However if you had the choice of a $17,000 R33 GTS-T and a $27,000 R32 GTR then I would personally go the R33. R33's are newer and look nicer when done right imo. Spend $10,000 on it and you will have a great looking and quick car.

Sup,

If your looking for factory mods and 200rwkw's get you going, then you could look no further then the 33. Newer, better interior, less likley to break etc. Though do you wanna buy a car that just "keeps you happy" or do you want to grow into the car, Neeed that extra power, WANT that 4WD corner exit. =)

- Michael

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...