Jump to content
SAU Community

  

32 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Are you comparing stock vs stock?  Only way to do this comparison fairly.

Yes!!! stock vs stock.

I posted up this thread in order to also find out a little more about the cars as i have come from a vl commodore so any infornmation id appriciate.

Thanks to all whom reply.

Its a matter of opinion. But the facts R33 is roomer and has a better more powerful engine, r33 is 100kgs heavier but still quicker in a straight line. Ive heard R32s handle better but im unsure on that one.

I prefer the looks of the R33, inside and out. R32's are starting to look a bit dated.

yeah zactly it all comes down to personal preference, everyones biased towards the car they drive, so your gonna get alot of opinions that will end up confusing you, only way to determine is find one of the two YOU like and buy it. :)

personally, R33 all the way, updated ex/interior, and jst looks alot better. :D

I love the 32s with my heart. for me they are a much nicer looking car, I don't even mind the interior.

BUT my head loves the 33s. they are slightly newer, slightly better interior etc.

BTW, i'm talking GTRs. 33 GTSTs do not float my boat.

 everyones biased towards the car they drive, so your gonna get alot of opinions that will end up confusing you

That is exactly what i thought when thinking about posting this thread but ended up doing it neways to hear what 33 drivers like over the 32 and vis versa.

Some intereting stuff has been said and helps.

Myself i like the 32 look over the 33 but again as another member said it comes down to what takes ya fancy.

Not sure about the 90's rolla though INASNT lol

32's are better.... In my opinion. Don't mention fuel economy on this forum! I don't bother checking anymore, it isnt that great. I don't know what has been done to my 32 besides zorst & pod, but it wastes my mates 33. His is stock as tho, but mine has had very little done to it as well. I prefer the look of the 32 GTSt. 33 GTR looks alright tho.

R32 My friend. I have one. Out of my group of friends, 8 of us have R32's and only one has an R33 (and for good reason) haha. I personaly don't like the look of the R33, not in stock form anyway.

R32's are cheaper for parts although due to their age, parts are a little harder to find (compared to R33)

It all comes down to personal opinion. If you want a boat, but have outright power, go the R33. If you want nimbleness and outright good looks, the R32 is the way to go (4 door especially hehe).

Don't get me wrong. R33's are great, especially when kit-ed up and NO WING! But I'll always be a 32 man... different strokes I guess.

Sava

Fulllock Motorsport

www.fulllock.com

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...