Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My bits of engine have come back from the machine shop. Part of the work they did was a balance on the crank / flywheel / clutch.

The guy I got to re-asssemble the engine is now all up-in-the-air because the machine shop has drilled into the side of my light-weight, CNC-machined, billet Aluminium flywheel to balance it. The "hole" is right under where a counterweight had been fitted to the pressure plate (at manufacture time). My engine guy reckons the machine shop should have simply moved the little counterweight, &/or added weight to the pressure plate only. The people I got the flywheel from in the first place reckon it's done all the time (removing metal from the flywheel).

What should I do? Should I complain to the machiners, or tell my engine guy to get a life? Any (constructive / instructive) comments appreciated.

TIA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82321-balancing-flywheel/
Share on other sites

Greg - the way it's normally done is:

- check run-out prior to balance (flywheel and fitted pressure plate).

- balance flywheel and pressure plate separately

- balance flywheel and pressure plate as an assembly.

It's quite normal to drill the outside of the flywheel to remove material to achieve balance. They obviously followed their usual practice and just weren't aware of the significance of the counterweight.

At the end of the day I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.

Thanks Steve. I would hope that they understood the significance of the counterweight. After all, I'm sure it's not the first one they have done.

That aside, why would the flywheel not be in balance in the first place? I guess the metallurgy wouldn't necessarily be perfect, so that some portions of the billet might be denser than other areas, right? Or the gear teeth attached to the outside rim might not be perfect, right?

Thanks Steve. I would hope that they understood the significance of the counterweight. After all, I'm sure it's not the first one they have done.

That aside, why would the flywheel not be in balance in the first place? I guess the metallurgy wouldn't necessarily be perfect, so that some portions of the billet might be denser than other areas, right? Or the gear teeth attached to the outside rim might not be perfect, right?

Interesting question? When they balance the full motor they need the flywheel and clutch as well as all the internals, is each component balanced individually or is the the total rotating mass that is in balance?

I'd assume that if at all possible that each individual component would be balanced seperately, then they would be assembled and balanced again as a whole.

This way it would keep the material that would have to be removed to a minimum.

The flywheel would probably not be balanced to a high precision straight from the factory, as all manufacturing processes are less than ideal, and most people probably wouldn't be keen on paying an extra $100 for a closely-balanced flywheel.

Interesting question? When they balance the full motor they need the flywheel and clutch as well as all the internals, is each component balanced individually or is the the total rotating mass that is in balance?
AFAIK, the pistons are made the same weight, the rods are made the same weight. Then presumably the piston/rod assemblies all weigh the same. So the reciprocating mass is balanced.

Then the crank is matched to the flywheel / clutch, so the rotating mass is balanced.

That aside, why would the flywheel not be in balance in the first place? I guess the metallurgy wouldn't necessarily be perfect, so that some portions of the billet might be denser than other areas, right? Or the gear teeth attached to the outside rim might not be perfect, right?

Manufacturing (machining) variations - even on a supposedly symmetrical component. While it's theoretically possible to get very tight tolerances using the best equipment, the cost would be prohibitive.

Metallurgical variations would be insignificant in this context (for a component machined from plate/billet...castings can be another matter).

AFAIK, the pistons are made the same weight, the rods are made the same weight.

Pistons are sold as a balanced set, as are rods. But manufacturing tolerances for balancing on mass produced engines are not as tight as you would use for a performance/race engine.....again mainly for reasons of cost.

Pistons are sold as a balanced set, as are rods.   But manufacturing tolerances for balancing on mass produced engines are not as tight as you would use for a performance/race engine.....again mainly for reasons of cost.
Didn't mean "made" as in "manufactured", I meant "made to be", ie adjusted to be all the same weight. If you get my drift.

I had my rb30 balanced up.

Every rod looked like it had been touched, almost every rod bolt.

Everything looked like it had been slightly touched to achieve a balance.

Even the wiseco forged pistons had a slight nick as they were obviously not all equal.

I was suprised when the rod bolts weren't equal weights. :O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that price include the rack time to straighten the frame and body and replacement of parts and paint, as well as the noise and emmisions testing  The last engineering certificate I had done, albeit about 15 years ago, was around $1000 for a few inspections and the certificate 
    • 😂 thanks guys. The diagram i had did not have the breather on it at all. Much appreciated.  
    • Geez, engineers fees have definitely gone up. Mine back 2007 cost me all of $300. Mind you, I had to go back to him a few times to get him to write the correct things on the report after he'd inspected it. Things like wrong exhaust size, wrong wheel sizes, etc etc.
    • Can we see a scan of the original quote? The problem with engineers (and by this, I mean, all engineers across all engineering industries) is that there are "engineers" and there are "engineers" (you'll have to imagine the two different vocal emphases on those two versions of the same word. Engineering is a mindset - your farm kid who spent his life rebuilding the tractor will likely make a good engineer. The farm kid who spent his life taking photos of butterflies.. perhaps not. But on top of that mindset, the modern engineer has to learn how to write so that there is absolutely no way of being misunderstood. Proposals/budget estimates/quotations are one place where this is absolutely vital. You have to delineate your scope of supply with extremely hard boundaries, and anywhere where there is any possibility of not being able to have such a hard boundary, you need to write language that will cover you from scope creep, cost overruns, the inevitable interference of the client or their "engineer", etc etc. Now, if your clients are the BHPs and the Rio Tintos of the world, and similar, then you get good at this. If you are an automotive engineer, pitching work to the great unwashed masses, your skills in this area might not be well developed, because you're only dealing with knuckle draggers trying to get a big block legal in a Torana. And when I say "might not"....I'd suggest there's a better than even chance that any such skills might be completely absent. So, we might be able to look at your quote and see what the opportunities are for rebuttal.
×
×
  • Create New...