Jump to content
SAU Community

Blank Dvds


Anakha
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, this has probably been through here before; but I was hoping for some opinions...

I'm getting back into 'backing up' my DVD collection, except I can't decide what blank DVDs to get. When I search for this on google or something - and get into the geek forums (no insult intended :(), there is so much info and different opinions, and soo many things I can't quite understand....

Just hoping if any had any preferences for a Sony DVD writer... looking for plus DVDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you can use either plus or minus DVD's. From what I've heard, I think the only difference is the method that the DVD burner uses to record the DVD.

I've used the minus ones before to make copies of some footage I recorded without any problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, this has probably been through here before; but I was hoping for some opinions...

I'm getting back into 'backing up' my DVD collection, except I can't decide what blank DVDs to get.  When I search for this on google or something - and get into the geek forums (no insult intended :rolleyes:), there is so much info and different opinions, and soo many things I can't quite understand....

Just hoping if any had any preferences for a Sony DVD writer... looking for plus DVDs.

Avoid the RITEKs at any cost... ive backed up a few hundred of my DVDs with PRINCOs which are reasonable (about 12 dorra a 50pk and theyre printable) and started using RITEKs cause they were meant to be better (also printable) and found theyre 10x worse.

RITEKs are good for burning but u can never copy the DVD u just backed up onto that bloody disk again... always gets a write error... stupid gay arse disk... ive got 200 DVDs which can now never be BACKED UP again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inark:

I've been using Ritek's (G04+G05) for the past ~2yrs (well over 500 disc's) for backing up many different type of things. My housemate (BIL) has only ever used the Princo's.

Now without using any type of software utilty to test the actual DVD (errors, etc etc) the only difference i've found between the Ritek and Princo's is that my Ritek's will play in absolutely any DVD Player you put them in. The Princo's will play in most, but not all DVD Players.

I'm happy to pay a little bit extra for the better brand so the only brand/type of disc I use is Ritek G04/G05 (4x/8x).

1 brand I would never touch is Laser *shivers*

Edit: Actually since replacing my Sony DRU512a (4x) with my LiteOn SOHW-1673S I do get many errors with trying to playback or decrypt DVD's on my PC.

Edit2: I just burned the exact same .iso image file onto a Ritek G04 and a Princo. The Ritek G05 gives read errors in DVD Decrypter and the Princo reads fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Princos are better than Ritek and are ok for DVD movies. Occasionally you will get a bad batch with a few duds but I'd expect that with most brands. One of the big factors is what type of dvd burner and dvd players you have. What works great in some drives works poorly in others. Not a very clear cut issue unfortunately. If you really want to ensure something is going to work 100% you are better off paying the extra for better name discs; sony etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inark:

I've been using Ritek's (G04+G05) for the past ~2yrs (well over 500 disc's) for backing up many different type of things. My housemate (BIL) has only ever used the Princo's.

Now without using any type of software utilty to test the actual DVD (errors, etc etc) the only difference i've found between the Ritek and Princo's is that my Ritek's will play in absolutely any DVD Player you put them in. The Princo's will play in most, but not all DVD Players.

I'm happy to pay a little bit extra for the better brand so the only brand/type of disc I use is Ritek G04/G05 (4x/8x).

1 brand I would never touch is Laser *shivers*

Edit: Actually since replacing my Sony DRU512a (4x) with my LiteOn SOHW-1673S I do get many errors with trying to playback or decrypt DVD's on my PC.

Edit2: I just burned the exact same .iso image file onto a Ritek G04 and a Princo. The Ritek G05 gives read errors in DVD Decrypter and the Princo reads fine.

edit2 is exacty what im talking about :P its not playing back where the issues come in its when you try and decrypt or shrink the same movie u burnt onto the ritek media... error error :D which means if something happens to that disk you cant copy it again :P I havent found away around copying from RITEKs and ive used about 10 different programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Princos are better than Ritek and are ok for DVD movies. Occasionally you will get a bad batch with a few duds but I'd expect that with most brands. One of the big factors is what type of dvd burner and dvd players you have. What works great in some drives works poorly in others. Not a very clear cut issue unfortunately. If you really want to ensure something is going to work 100% you are better off paying the extra for better name discs; sony etc.

Yeah, Sony Dual Layer (got it for cheap) DRU-710A, does +/- R/RW and + R Dual layer. Though I'm only interested in DVD+Rs at the mo...

I know about the difference between drives, I can't see why everything can't just be universal *groan*, but hey, just try our best right....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it cracks me up how much DVD writers are now... its great lol

even when something new and fandangaly comes out u can get em for like 100 haha like my dual layer... got it when they were first released... only cost me 110 for the 12x.... now u can get 16x for like 50 haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its when you try and decrypt or shrink the same movie u burnt onto the ritek media... error error :unsure:
I've found it's generally the "bup" files giving me the errors. The 'bup' files are just backups of the "ifo" files. Maybe it's possible to replace the corrupt bup's with renamed ifo's (as bup's) and then re-burn. I'll try it out later on...

My BIL has been using Princo's since the day he got his DVD-RW (about a year ago). He's never once complained about them and never had issues playing Princo's that were burn't ages ago (that's the problem many people complain about with the Princo's, the dye doesn't last very long before it becomes unreadable).

I hate the brand princo, but I don't want to spend $60+ for a 50pk of Taiyo Yuden's from Melbourne :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inark I think I may have just found the problem with these DVD-R's i've been using. They weren't genuine "Ritek G04" but instead were "RiMedia - Ritek G04" which is the cheaper division of the Ritek company. I didn't realise this until I opened my 3rd 50pk of these dvd's (bought in bulk ages ago because I only had a 4x dvd burner and couldn't get any genuine Ritek G04's from my local pc shop).

Have you been using Ritek G04/05 or RiMedia's?

I just went and bought some Verbatim (MCC04) dvd+r's just to see what the quality of these were like (been recommended 'anything' verbatim by many other people). They were $25/25pk which is bloody expensive compared to what I normally pay but just wanted to see what the quality was like.

I did a 'disc quality' scan in Nero CD/DVD Speed and these are my results:

RiMedia/Ritek G04 - Rating: 35

PI Errors

Avg: 35.90

Max: 361

Total: 482321

PI Failures

Avg: 0.35

Max: 16

Total: 5068

Princo - Rating: 90

PI Errors

Avg: 16.30

Max: 106

Total: 215446

PI Failures

Avg: 0.35

Max: 4

Total: 6810

Verbatim MCC04 - Rating: 95

PI Errors

Avg: 0.96

Max: 9

Total: 6479

PI Failures

Avg: 0.01

Max: 2

Total: 96

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sell PRINCO media in our shop + some other random brands.

-R is the most popular I have found ( looking at the last 6 months of sales )

Ive been a PRINCO man for over a year now, -R form with printable white surface. have had not one fault on me in the 4x -R range and only two fault on me in the 8x -R range, however I burnt about 200 DVDs and two not working is not a problem at all! * Under 50c each anyway*

They playback in almost every dvd player I have put them into aswell.

:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm i have backed up a good 1000+] dvds and i must say RITEKS's are the way to go although theyre out of business now so i use RiDATA. reason i use these is when im 'backing up' my PS2 games, Riteks are better for the PS2, the PS2's laser works overtime with princo's which will end up killin the PS2 so thats why i pay the odd $2 or $3 and get the good media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Benm, can you do a disc test with just a blank DVD, or have ya gotta burn to it first?

Yeah, I've also been told Verbatim is good... more expensive, but worth it, same with some called TY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Benm, can you do a disc test with just a blank DVD, or have ya gotta burn to it first?

Yeah, I've also been told Verbatim is good... more expensive, but worth it, same with some called TY?

Not working on my pc aswell, might need a different version of NERO benm what version do you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DVD needs to have a DVD movie on it (well I think it requires a DVD movie, haven't tried it with an app/game/mp3 etc only DVD movies).

Yeah TY (Taiyo Yuden) are considered a very high quality disc. You can get them from www.jpldisplays.com.au

Another good brand is the Ricoh's (model: ricohjpnr01 / r02).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
×
×
  • Create New...