Jump to content
SAU Community

Wideband 02 Sensors


Baz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any previous use of an 02 wideband sensor installed on there car? Basically I am looking at the use of a wideband sensor in my quest to learn how to tune cars myself and the use of one of these would be an optimal way of doing so without the need for a workshop/dyno.

Can the O2 sensor be setup to allow the ECU to still recieve information to allow it to still operate in open loop function? Or will it have to be disconnected once monitoring the A/F ratio to the origanal sensor?

I'm basically looking for an O2 sensor which can log A/F depending on RPM rather than just display the reading, so I can then tune the fuel/air maps after logging the data. I am guessing this would be achieveable at a cheaper price by hooking it up to a laptop to log data.

Also I am looking at the option of replacing my ECU soon with an aftermarket one and I believe some support the use of wideband O2 sensors but am unsure which ones do.

I'm relatively new to how wideband O2 sensors work so all information and experiences would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Innovate Motorsports LM-1 installed in my car. It has logging and with the analogue breakout box, it can log 4 channels of data including RPM and whatnot against AFR. It has around 40 minutes worth of logging and you can download the data to a laptop later via RS-232 with the included software. With the inputs, you can even make up a table with TPS VS AFR VS RPM for a grid display. Also the forum support for the LM-1 is second to none. www.innovatemotorsports.com

I had the extra bung installed into my dump pipe so that the stock ECU still uses the original O2 sensor. If you insist in replacing the stock O2 sensor with the wideband, the LM-1 can simulate a narrowband output to keep the stockie ECU happy.

Only a handful of ECUs support wideband input, and I dont think the LM1 can actually interface with any of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Innovate Motorsports LM-1 installed in my car. It has logging and with the analogue breakout box, it can log 4 channels of data including RPM and whatnot against AFR. It has  around 40 minutes worth of logging and you can download the data to a laptop later via RS-232 with the included software. With the inputs, you can even make up a table with TPS VS AFR VS RPM for a grid display. Also the forum support for the LM-1 is second to none. www.innovatemotorsports.com

I had the extra bung installed into my dump pipe so that the stock ECU still uses the original O2 sensor. If you insist in replacing the stock O2 sensor with the wideband, the LM-1 can simulate a narrowband output to keep the stockie ECU happy.

Only a handful of ECUs support wideband input, and I dont think the LM1 can actually interface with any of those.

The LM1 talks very nicely to the Autronic ECU, and enables self tune as well. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought it from the website. I cant remember off the top of my head what it cost, but 3 day shipping was about 60USD so add that on top of 429USD for the unit + analogue input box and thats how much it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought a wbo2 sensor from www.zeitronix.com great little unit very accurate, but I didn't buy an LCD output screen so it only works with a lap top.

The zeitronix logger has many input options, like TPS, MAP, RPM, AFR, Exhaust gas temp, and any signal between 0 and 5V.

Would've be way better if I'd shelled out for the LCD screen aswell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought a wbo2 sensor from www.zeitronix.com great little unit very accurate, but I didn't buy an LCD output screen so it only works with a lap top. 

The zeitronix logger has many input options, like TPS, MAP, RPM, AFR, Exhaust gas temp, and any signal between 0 and 5V.

Would've be way better if I'd shelled out for the LCD screen aswell.

I agree the www.zeitronix.com a/f ratio meter rocks :)

Helped e out something cronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...