Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ender, this is true, but speak to rev210 - he got some great times with 100kg of balast in the boot. On a dyno sometimes they put people in the boot. A serious drag car will try and loose as much weight as possible.

Try taking your car for a thrash with a full tank of petrol, 1/2 a tank and almost empty. I definatley notice a traction difference. In second with a near empty tank, from 30kph with 1/2 throttle and in a straight line my car goes sideways - doesnt happen with a full tank of petrol.

Remeber skylines dont have alot of weight on the back wheels for a drag car, which is why squat is so important on RWD for the drags, transfers to the back wheels.

People in the boot on a dyno is a bit different.....I understand squat is important for takeoff....hicas does not make your car squat....weight does (not an extra 15-20kgs) and weight transfer does...and rear suspension settings do and geometry of rear suspension does....having a lock bar as opposed to a hicas rack does not change the static geometry therefore how can it induce squat....(apart fromt he slight increase the 15kgs has...or is this the only advantage r31nismoid was proposing?).

1 tankof petrol is 50kgs not 15-20kgs so yes...i agree you would feel it...

I wonder where the point where weight for traction becomes a liability for acceleration after traction is not an issue....ie obviously 200kg in the boot would give an improvement in grip on take off...but at half track you are lugging an extra 200kg which slows you down at this point....

whereas if you had least weight possible you would have less grip on takeoff but at half track you would accelerate faster due to less weight.....

I wonder if anyone has done a graph or similar to find the optimum points for a skyline??

Hi guys the way the HICAS works is like 2 pistons facing each other. Each piston is connected to one rear wheel via the usual tie rod (like on the front). The hydraulic pump can supply oil to one side of both pistons or the middle of the pistons. This means the pump can make the rear wheels toe in, toe out or steer together to the left or right. The HICAS ECU decides which solenoid valve opens and where the oil flows.

This system, in principle, is the same for R32 and R33. In the R32 the power steering pump at the front (driven by the engine) has two stages, one for the front wheels and one for the rear wheels. On R33's the engine driven pump only works on the front wheels (single stage). There is an electric pump at the rear instead.

If the pump is working there is pressure and oil flow to keep the rear wheels pointing where the HICAS ECU wants them. If you simply disconnect the pump, there is potential for oil to slowly seep past the piston rings and you can end up with funny rear wheel alignment.

Removing the rear steering rack, HICAS ECU, oil lines (R32), electric pump (on R33), changing to an R33 (single stage pump) on R32, reducing the oil capacity of the power steering system (R32), removing the steel pipes that run from the front to the rear (R32) and the 3 solenoids (R32) all adds up to significant weight saving (27 kgs on our R32 GTST race car).

But the main advantage is the removal of something that changes the attitude of the rear of the car other then the driver. I like to be in control, not have some ECU doing it for me. It is very disconcerting to have chosen a line around a corner and then have the HICAS decide it wants to change it. So you correct for it and the HICAS changes it again. Very unsettling.

Somebody mentioned weight over the rear wheels and drags. Well my experience has been that if you take the weight out of the car (front or rear) it will accelerate faster. If the rear does not squat enough to get traction, then put some softer springs in it or higher profile tyres or lower pressures. It will be faster every time than sticking a lump of lead in the boot.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

Just for the record - the best launch I have ever done is when I had my parents in the back seat !! ;) Poor Mum crapped herself !! But she loved it.. But in my case I've got hard suspension in the back, so really, to get good launches you need soft suspension just what SydneyKid said.

Re: the unplugging the HICAS ECU - I've said it once before that you need to lock the rear wheels into position. Hence why TOMEI have shims with thier kits that are placed in the rods to LOCK the wheel position.

J

Originally posted by Ender

1 tankof petrol is 50kgs not 15-20kgs so yes...i agree you would feel it...

Soz! i meant that it does squat... and gets good traction.

On a 1/4 tank my car is far too wild to get traction.

with a 1/2-full tank my car launches with real good traction.

Now if HICAS was gone... then say, 20 kg... and a whole tank of fuel equals 50 kgs... then with 1/2 a tank of fuel i'd struggle for grip as opposed to a 1/4. ???

does that sounds right?

Ppl talking about traction for dragging and stuff...one of the things you can do for your rear drive car to greatly improve traction if you have height adjustable suspension is to raise it up as high as you can...only for dragging obviously....this creates a higher center of gravity and thus more weight transfer onto the rear for more traction.....

No good lowering your car for dragging...

Cheers,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • interestingly enough, i found out the answer is yes. doing a flush did fix my recurring A/T light. it might have been because of the trans filter: but that doesn't really make sense to me. the fluid/filter was super dirty. would that increase the pressure in the lines and trigger an A/T light? does the car even have a way of detecting that? i have no idea. i've done 200+ miles after the flush and no A/T light. if my A/B solenoids went bad, i would think the light would've come on. shifts and drives way better now though...at 2k rpm instead of 2500...no hesitation and downshifts when i want it to. 
    • I vote go red. Only because I hate keeping gloss black clean. Was no worries helping out either! Glad you've survived the rain outs of QLD
    • I would again like too thank Matt for his help in me sourcing the detachable hard top for the little red car, without Matt's assistance in inspecting it and locking it down, I can guarantee it would have sold before I could get up to see it,  and as that was the only available NC hardtop in Australia, I consider myself extremely lucky on multiple levels To say I'm more that happy would be an understatement And, it is 100% water tight, I drove through torrential rain coming back south, and by torrential, they type of rain that doing 40kph in a 110kph zone was a real thing, and even then, the standing water on the Hwy was deep enough to throw waves I'm also more than happy that the huge "BEASTS" that Matt calls dogs didn't eat me for lunch, I'm sure the sniffs and licks were more to "taste test" me, over being to friendly Now to work out what colour to get it painted, panel match, or gloss black........first world problems are real
    • Actually I might have figured out. Looks like there is a tab according to google images but it's hidden. Silly me.
×
×
  • Create New...