Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey just wondering, what is the weight difference between a normal r33 bonnet and a carbon fibre version? I dont know much about carbon fibre but ive felt the weight of a normal one and im guessing theres a significant difference.

and i tried to post this in the bodykit/aero section where i thought it would go but it wouldnt let me, whats the go?

Thanks

And had, what, a tenth of the strength :D

The bonnet isn't a load bearing structural component, and generally any accident that stresses the bonnet is usually a sizable one, which means you have other concerns.

As such, who cares how strong it is? Unless you're planning on spending a lot of time sitting on it, or having some lycra-clad bimbo doing that, as long as it supports its own weight its strong enough.

The bonnet isn't a load bearing structural component, and generally any accident that stresses the bonnet is usually a sizable one, which means you have other concerns.

As such, who cares how strong it is? Unless you're planning on spending a lot of time sitting on it, or having some lycra-clad bimbo doing that, as long as it supports its own weight its strong enough.

lol, well said..

And i agree..

though with my R32 GTST... when the front of my car said gday to the back of an Ford EA wagon... Its rear bar was higher than my front bar so pretty much the only thing that got hit was my bonnet :D

Its rear bar was higher than my front bar so pretty much the only thing that got hit was my bonnet ;)

How hard did you hit? Conceivably it could have been enough to crack CF too. Its not like your average street car CF components are built to the same engineering and quality control as a race car, especially since most are just CF overlaid on fibreglass anyway.

At which point you'd be up for a new bonnet regardless of what it was made of.....and I know which one I'd rather pay for.

If I ever replace my bonnet and want the dark weave, I'll probably go for a CF overlaid 'glass bonnet. As long as it weighs less than my factory one and doesn't cost me a fortune, it'll do.

The bonnet isn't a load bearing structural component, and generally any accident that stresses the bonnet is usually a sizable one, which means you have other concerns.

As such, who cares how strong it is? Unless you're planning on spending a lot of time sitting on it, or having some lycra-clad bimbo doing that, as long as it supports its own weight its strong enough.

My point was its not like fibrglass has a weight-to-weight advantage over C/F.

LW.

My point was its not like fibrglass has a weight-to-weight advantage over C/F.

midnight says that his fibreglass bonnet is lighter than a CF one. Unless its fallen apart on him, its strong enough to do the job.

No it doesn't have a weight to weight advantage, but it has a weight to strength necessity advantage.

Any strength over a margin above minimum requirements is wasted (especially on a component that isn't called upon to sustain loads), and if the tradeoff is extra weight then its a performance deficit too.

midnight says that his fibreglass bonnet is lighter than a CF one. Unless its fallen apart on him, its strong enough to do the job.

No it doesn't have a weight to weight advantage, but it has a weight to strength necessity advantage.

Any strength over a margin above minimum requirements is wasted (especially on a component that isn't called upon to sustain loads), and if the tradeoff is extra weight then its a performance deficit too.

You'd think I had killed his dog or something.

Midnight pointed out an advantage of a fibreglass bonnet, I alluded to what some might see as a weakness. I seem to recall some posts awhile ago from people who had issues with the hinges sheering on one brand of FRP bonnet due to a lack of strength.

The weight comparisons to C/F bonnets can also be misleading: most people think their $800 "C/F bonnet" is the real deal when its little more than an FRP bonnet with a C/F top skin.

You'd think I had killed his dog or something.

The weight comparisons to C/F bonnets can also be misleading:  most people think their $800 "C/F bonnet" is the real deal when its little more than an FRP bonnet with a C/F top skin.

I loved Buster!

True about the composition, though. Most carbon bonnets are FRP with a wet CF skin, but that should weigh close to a pure FRP bonnet.

A pure dry CF bonnet should weigh a bit less and be a lot stronger, but that stuff is expensive.

I don't think it would really matter if it was fibreglass on the inside, as long as there was a a good weight advantage over stock.

Hmm yeah i remember that thread about the CF bonnet flying off looked nasty. How quick was it going though? I thought it was doing a top speed run and was highly modified, lol i dont think that will be a problem for me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...