Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Works Auto

What cant you take it ??

that a car 3-4 years older can smoke a car thats bigger in capacity ?? thats saying something huh ??

you think im talking shit..

come down to motorplex next week for a race .

I think you have your head up your ass.

Bit like most  of the r33 drivers. thats why i bought a r32 :lol: :) :)

Well done, you are my hero.

I sold my R32 because it was a slow piece of shit.

See, we're all entitled to opinions... :)

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Works Auto

What cant you take it ??

that a car 3-4 years older can smoke a car thats bigger in capacity ?? thats saying something huh ??

you think im talking shit..

come down to motorplex next week for a race .

I think you have your head up your ass.

Bit like most  of the r33 drivers. thats why i bought a r32 :lol: :) :)

No, its not saying anything really. The weight of the car and the power generated by the engine is what matters.

The RB20 can produce some good power, damn shame the gearbox they put with the R32 is easily broken. Makes you wish you owned a gtr.

I don't think anyone is saying that the RB20DET is bad, but to say silly comments about the RB25DET will not go down to well. Both engines have there good and bad point, so why not leave it at that, don't go digging any deeper.

See'ya:burnout:

The R32 GTST is at least the lightest of the bunch so it's not hard at all by comparison to get them going real quick.

Works Auto, good luck with giving the R33 boys hell next week. Nothing better than beating them at the plex for hanging the crap on you. Bring on the grudge match racing.

Originally posted by Works Auto

Yes a gtr would be nice. but not all of us can afford one.

Last night i ran 13.4 @ 105mph on stock turbo. It was a very hot night also.

The r33 i ran did 15.1. Makka did 13.3 in his r33 but he has hi flow turbo  and power fc.

There will now be a period of silence for the R33 owners....

Guest Works Auto

Im not giving there cars shit or the people shit. Its just the attitude of some r33 drivers.

They talk it up big time , then go down to the plex and run a 15 or high 14.

Then come back on here and brag some more about how powerful there cars are. Maybe they should learn to drive ??

Works Auto,

Well seeing as your turbo isn't factory then maybe you should set the facts straight. Macka has run a 12.9 in his shitty R33.

While I agree that many other car owners talk about quick time, I don't think it is related to specifically to R33's.

Your times are good, and many R33's run similar or better, but so what. Doesn't mean you need to act like a wanker cause others do.

And seeing as many R33 owners will be coming to your place of work then you might want to tone your attitude down.

See'ya :burnout:

Works Auto,

I thought last night you said you didn't know what the trubo was, but today you do?

Any R33's in particular on this forum saying they are quick when there not? Like HP most people want to say they have more, but in general everyone is pretty honest about the times they pull.

I'm sure your car can go faster, and good luck to you, but no need to group all R33 owners into the same category.

See'ya:burnout:

this topic was not about bad mouthing anybody or engines, its about performance, & learning from each others knowledge so lets talk about that & not whose right or wrong.

Theres are few r32s & r33 with t3/t4 & t04e turbos around doin good power, but are there any r32 or r33 owners out there with a new garrett series turbo, trust tdXX turbos or a hks unit.

I would imagine they would spool alot faster then a t04, & would give better mid range.

I would hate 2 have 240rwkw & turbo starts spooling around 4000rpm, even though the rb20det loves sitting around 4000-6000rpm mark

i would find that hard 2 drive & abit point less & dull

for a everyday fast car i think we should aim over mid range

Originally posted by Joe

this topic was not about bad mouthing anybody or engines, its about performance, & learning from each others knowledge so lets talk about that & not whose right or wrong.

Good call, leave the egos at the doorway and lets talk business :burnout:

Originally posted by BOOSTMEISTER

The cam gears increased the bottom end and the top end by about 10rwkw each but the middle of the power band is about the same.

I always thought Cam gears were design 2 move the power transfer around.

eg. move top end power to bottom end or mid range

Or even moving the mid range to give more power top end, tuning it how you want it always depended on the power curve.

i would imagine most people will take power from top end to increase more midrange as its more often used on the road.

Correct me if im wrong though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...