Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok.. not trying to start a fire here.. I've had a R33 GTR for about 4 years now and I'm ready for a new car.

The GTR has been a fun car, but has been a major hassle in recent years living in inner city sydney.. I've had a lot of unwanted attention (eg ppl following), it's a hassle to park (both security-wise and just being a big car in the city with lots of tight spaces), and also my GF won't drive it because it scares her ;-P and it's just a pain to handle over driveways etc being so low (lowered further on Nismo springs).

So I've been looking around at hatches, but I think I still need a fast car.. I've been seriously considering a Peugeot 206 Gti 180, but I'm starting to get greedy again and I'm now thinking about maybe an AlfaRomeo 147 GTA. I drove the 180, threw it around a few corners and it handles OK, but it's definitely not a muscle car. The engine sound is just weak. The GTA is v6 and much more powerful (184kw), so I'm hoping for something a little more exhilerating.

Has anyone here driven both?

I know it's kind of comparing apples and oranges.. it's not a 4wd for one, and it's a hatch. But just looking for opinions on general performance and fun value of the GTA vs the GTR.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83170-r33-gtr-vs-alfa-147-gta/
Share on other sites

nothing will beat a GTR so dont compare ;)

As far as hot hatches go... driven a cooper s? they handle and go like nothing else...

the little renno cleo sports? aparently they are awesome cars

my mate drive the GTA before buying the cooper S and said the gta just couldnt get the power down and wasnt as nice as the mini...

another mate has a SP23... these handle the road like nothing else have a really nice interior (leather pack) but kinda lack some go... still a nice car....

astra turbo... atleast its still blown ;)

How about the R32 Golf? I got owned by one a few weeks ago. :D Quick litle car: http://carsguide.news.com.au/news/story_pa...5E27286,00.html

And also here is the ULTIMATE R32 Golf: http://www.streetracersonline.com/articles/hpar32/

At least you can still say you have an R## and people will think its a skyline :D

im not a fan of Alfa, for one reason only, my friend works at an Alfa dealer (as a mech) and the amount of Alfa they get in which are f**ked isnt funny, they had to replace a timing belt on one which had only done 5,000km, seems like they have alot of problems

Yeah, the problem with any Alfa is that they've got Italian build quality. As nice as Alfa V6s sound, I don't know how long the car will hang together.

Channeling 184kW through the front wheels isn't my idea of a good time, since corners are my thing and power-down isn't the GTA's.

I'd opt for the Golf GTi, myself. Much better build quality and its still a very nice car. The Renault and Peugeot are both French cars, and those things don't tend to stay together very well either.

Going from a GTR to any sort of small hatchback you are going to be dissapointed with the power.

I would never buy the Alfa as it is FWD and has too much power for this set up.

I think the Renault Clio Sport is the pick of the small cars at the moment, but I do here there is a new version coming to Aus shortly that has a mid-mounted V6 (200kw) AWD, this would be worth it IMO. There is also a new Astra Turbo coming soon.

I don't consider the Skyline a big car having owned a falcon - I was going to say a WRX but remembered you dont want attention so what about a Liberty GT - styling, performance, reliablity, mid sized, should be perfect.

i agree with others on here who suggest the VW Golf Gti DSG. Seems to be a fantastic little car.

If you want something a bit more medium sized, like spooks said a new liberty, or, my personal chioce if i were looking for a new car, an accord euro (i just love em)...

Heaps of ppl are recommending the new Golf Gti.. The problem is tho.. If you want one of those you are in a minimum 9 month queue.. that's how long it will take to get one of those.

I would definitely be seriously considering the gti if I didn't have to wait so long for it.. there's been some really good reviews.

Also, the Mini Cooper S - has pretty much zero luggage capacity, so I can rule that one out.. Apart from that I really like the mini..

I've done a bit more research on the Alfa GTA. I downloaded a Top Gear episode where they tested it and absolutely hammered it for having so much power in a FWD and very little technology to control the power... But at the end of the review they all said they'd buy one over the Golf R32 and Ford Focus SRI because it's such a crazy fun car.

Also vs the Gold R32 which a couple of ppl recommended, I think the Alfa has it hands down on styling and just being an interesting and unique car.. The Gti R32 looks a bit boring.. Almost japanese hatch boring. Other than that though it is a fair bit better performance-wise.

I haven't looked into the Series 1 BMW though... might have a look.

So far, I think I'm still erring towards Alfa GTA. It's a bit silly having all that power with little technology, but it would def be fun at the lights and still be a really nice ride.

having recently gone (6 months) from a 340rwkw r33 gt-r, to a renault sport clio 182 cup, i can understand what you are getting at. i was sick of the hassles of owning a big heavy gt-r and a little hatchback does get appealing. however, i am starting to look at getting back into a gt-r, just trying to decide if a r32 or an r34 is the best option... i just need to decide if the extra costs (insurance, rego, fuel) associated with a gt-r, along with the urge to pour money into it, is something i can justify at the moment

Personally, I'd take the rsc 182 over the gti 180, if possible, drive both on the same day on the same roads and you will see why... they are a much better car. cant comment on the alfa sorry, i found them overpriced for what they are

Yeah I know I'll miss the GTR, but it's time for something different.. I wouldn't be surprised if I came back for an r34 gtr in a few years..

Re the Peugeot 180 vs Renault, I know the Renault has been getting better reviews, but I still find that the Pug is heaps nicer, eg interior and styling to still come out on top in my books..

I'm pretty set on the Alfa 147 GTA now though. It's an insane amount of power that the car isn't really equipped to handle well on the track (no awd etc), but in reality that's not where I'm taking it. It'll still beat most cars off the line, has a great sounding v6, still handles better than most, and is a massively stylish italian car.. I haven't really owned a luxury sportscar with all leather etc, so I'm keen to try it on for size for a while. It's been all Nissan for me so far.

Thanks everyone for the tips..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...