Stock 1/4 Mile R33

[tezflow]

Hi guys, after having my 33 for a couple of months now i thought it was about time to take it to calder and see what she can run 0-400m in before i start with the modifications, so i have something to base improvments on.

The cars stock and i mean dead stock, no exhaust, stock boost, no pod, not even a fancy panel filter just one of those yellow paper ones in the stock airbox.

Its a 95 GTST 5speed, these are the times i got:

1st: 15.611 @ 94.94

2nd: 14.902 @ 96.45

3rd: 14.661 @ 96.23

I was pretty happy with the 14.6, I was wondering what kind of times you guys have got when your cars are /were stock?

[Mulkers]

I am pretty sure 14.5 is factory, so a little work on the launch, and all will be well.

Are you going to modify it?

[nitemare5]

Hi guys, after having my 33 for a couple of months now i thought it was about time to take it to calder and see what she can run 0-400m in before i start with the modifications, so i have something to base improvments on.

The cars stock and i mean dead stock, no exhaust, stock boost, no pod,  not even a fancy panel filter just one of those yellow paper ones in the stock airbox.

Its a 95 GTST 5speed, these are the times i got:

1st:  15.611  @ 94.94

2nd: 14.902  @ 96.45

3rd:  14.661  @ 96.23

I was pretty happy with the 14.6, I was wondering what kind of times you guys have got when your cars are /were stock?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That's a pretty good result ! may I ask what was your 60ft time were on those 3 runs if you don't mind.

[Bunta]

thats a really good time Pretty much right on what the factory says (which,I think, is set by race/really good drivers and is the best time they managed, correct me if wrong) so in a 10 year old car it must mean your car is in excellent shape..nice. I managed a 14.6 on the Gtech in my car (also stock everything at the time) but who knows with those things

[tezflow]

may I ask what was your 60ft time were on those 3 runs if you don't mind.

Yeah sure the 60 foot times were as follow

1st: 2.293

2nd: 2.376

3rd: 2.298

[jazza08]

Times came down ALOT without the 60' time decreasing...

What shift methods were u using? Im guessin the 1st run was diff from the 2nd and 2nd from the 3rd etc

Wierd you have similar 60' times and similar trap speed but way different times

Very good work in a complete stocko 14.6!

[tezflow]

[Times came down ALOT without the 60' time decreasing...

What shift methods were u using? Im guessin the 1st run was diff from the 2nd and 2nd from the 3rd etc

Wierd you have similar 60' times and similar trap speed but way different times

Very good work in a complete stocko 14.6!]

I thought it was wierd too, i wasnt using any shift methods i was just hammering it the best i could! lol

[gmchaser]

looking at the 60ft times i rekon the car can run faster wif better launches.

[The Mafia]

stock, with my boost all over the place (5psi to 5500rpm, then 10 psi to 7000rpm)

I ran a 14.8 with a 2.1 launch.

[Fly_With_Sky]

well done on the times. Your pretty close to the factory quoted times. If you decrease you 60ft times then you should be getting the exact the factory times (14.3 i think nissan claimed).

May i ask at what rpms you launched the car?