Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From my Experience so far Factory ECU does not like Turbo upgrades to much, Mine runs a pair of GT2560Rs, Trust Greddy Dumps and front pipe, 14psi and gets 315rwHP.

Runs extremely rich over 5000rpm, restricting power.

For me now to get 450rwHP (similar to your goal) I would require a PowerFC and some larger injectors (probably SARD 700cc) and some adjustable cam gears, add a more boost she'll hit 450 ;)

All up in parts alone you'd be looking at around $6500.

well after rebuild i will have around 5000 for the turbo upgrade.

i will be getting ecu at the same time to eliminate the need for AFM's

i will also be running only 12psi until the motor has run in, so wont need injectors for another few months

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well after rebuild i will have around 5000 for the turbo upgrade.

i will be getting ecu at the same time to eliminate the need for AFM's

i will also be running only 12psi until the motor has run in, so wont need injectors for another few months

twin gt2560r are the go

last car i put together with these turbos and small cams and pfc

made 510rwhp at 15.8psi with raser sharp throddle responsive the only reson it was tuned down to under 16psi was it madent had the new nismo pump fitted yet (it made 524at just on 17psi) and was boarding on the limit of the std fuel pump.

as stated earlier you can get gt2560r ~$2500 and add ~$1000 for pfc and about $300 for rb20/25 afms ,~$700 700cc injectors sard your in business. You'll make 400 to mid 400's with out cams but through a good set of cams in the mix and you should be aroung the 500rwhp.

I personally haven't seen a better on the street combo than this for all round performance(responce verse out right hp)

my 2c

My advice if you go for low mounts is to save the money from the dumps and get the injectors straight away.

Still no proof dumps do anything really that I've seen.

Also - stock fuel pump ok for upto 350rwkw's.

For refernce I'm running twin 2530's with Sard 700cc injectors - stock fuel pump - stock dumps - making 325rwkw's @ 19psi (stock bottom end).

But also had to upgrade the AFM's (am running Nismo's).

Have fun.

My advice if you go for low mounts is to save the money from the dumps and get the injectors straight away.

Still no proof dumps do anything really that I've seen.

Also - stock fuel pump ok for upto 350rwkw's.

For refernce I'm running twin 2530's with Sard 700cc injectors - stock fuel pump - stock dumps - making 325rwkw's @ 19psi (stock bottom end).

But also had to upgrade the AFM's (am running Nismo's).

Have fun.

I remember SK saying he tested a split dump/front setup and it brought boost on a good 300RPM earlier. If you have a R34 (as per your sig), they run a better dump than the R32/33 so the advantages of aftermarket dumps will be smaller.

Hey pnblight,

Using the 2560 turbos what is the largest cam lift and duration you would go?

Good question, I have been concidering trying some more aggressive cams in mine when i do a full rebuild next month( going full internals) BUT the result i achieved with the r34 vspec i mention aboved were quiet awesome. The tomei poncams stage 2 are simple an awesome on road package (as they bolt straight in and give great results) I have yet to find the limits of the gt2560r's yet but i believe i must be getting close to there peak performance (i stopped tuning mine at 500rwhp as it had std internals and r34 is a brand new motor and is only running 15.8psi at 510rwhp) make you wounder what is posible from it at 20psi plus and some cam timing.(Garret australia tells me the turbines are good for 2 bar but i doubt the actuators would hold that).

I personaly dont think i would go past 10.8mm lift and around the 260 to 270 deg depending on application (but with the extra lift you need to do a number of head mods , cam cap retaining studs upgrade, valve springs upgrade , lomb clearance machined to state a few. So the question is will you gain much from larger cams from these turbos ? most likely not over the simple poncam combination, so valve for money it most likely not worth the effort.

pete

ps does that answer what you wanted to know

  • 9 months later...

Some interesting numbers being thrown around. Was assured 350kw @ the wheels was the limit of the stock rods. I'm looking at buying an R32 with 63,000km on it, which is fitted with GT2530's, Mine's dump pipes, high flow 3 inch cat and continues at 3 inch all the way back, stock remapped ECU, stock injectors and pump, upgraded FPR, stock cams and gears and runs about 13 psi. Makes close to 250kw @ the wheels. Was planning to change pump (Bosch 040), injectors (SARD 600cc), AFM's (Nismo), ECU (PFC), cam gears (Some sort of name brand, whatever looks hot) and maybe cams (Tomei Pon).

As i said, i was assured this would bend rods. I expect this combination would make around 350-375kw @ the wheels on 22 psi or so (correct me if i'm wrong), but would it live with day to day driving? And would the stock internals handle the load?

Sorry if i'm completely wrong. I'm pretty new to these cars...

Some interesting numbers being thrown around. Was assured 350kw @ the wheels was the limit of the stock rods. I'm looking at buying an R32 with 63,000km on it, which is fitted with GT2530's, Mine's dump pipes, high flow 3 inch cat and continues at 3 inch all the way back, stock remapped ECU, stock injectors and pump, upgraded FPR, stock cams and gears and runs about 13 psi. Makes close to 250kw @ the wheels. Was planning to change pump (Bosch 040), injectors (SARD 600cc), AFM's (Nismo), ECU (PFC), cam gears (Some sort of name brand, whatever looks hot) and maybe cams (Tomei Pon).

As i said, i was assured this would bend rods. I expect this combination would make around 350-375kw @ the wheels on 22 psi or so (correct me if i'm wrong), but would it live with day to day driving? And would the stock internals handle the load?

Sorry if i'm completely wrong. I'm pretty new to these cars...

What I've read over the years: Roughly speaking.

Stock pistons, 600Hp crank

Rods, 600-700 Hp at the crank

Lots of revs and detonation, poor tuning will kill stuff quicker, so many variables.

you want big single and 350awkw? go a hks t04z kit.. from nengun.. comes with absolutely everything needed for the big single upgrade and fairly decent price for a hks kit

also why get rid of the afm's? they arent a restriction.. just run 2 z32 afm's and you'll be fine.. and its the simplest computer to install in any of these imports.. would you rather pay 1000 for a power fc and do the install yourself than go get it tuned.. or would you rather pay 1800 for a haltech than on top of that pay for it to be installed than still have to get it tuned? if you really want to get rid of the afm's go a power fc dejetro by far the best option out there for those 'afm' hating people with jap cars..

Edited by rb26s13
As i said, i was assured this would bend rods. I expect this combination would make around 350-375kw @ the wheels on 22 psi or so (correct me if i'm wrong), but would it live with day to day driving? And would the stock internals handle the load?

Dont go back to the place that assured you that the rods will bend.

Because they obviously dont know what they are doing :)

Stock motor wont live forever @ 350rwkw, many circuit RB26's live a few years.

Just budget for a rebuild eventually.

All you need is a set of pistons in there really and tidy everything up, put it back together.

Things like crank collar etc etc etc.

Just the little things that add up.

Stock crank & rods will be perfectly fine

Dont go back to the place that assured you that the rods will bend.

Because they obviously dont know what they are doing :P

Stock motor wont live forever @ 350rwkw, many circuit RB26's live a few years.

Just budget for a rebuild eventually.

All you need is a set of pistons in there really and tidy everything up, put it back together.

Things like crank collar etc etc etc.

Just the little things that add up.

Stock crank & rods will be perfectly fine

A guy i work with came out with that statement that 350kw was about the limit. I understand a stock motor, if it was abused and revved to redline often, would not last long (probably 3-6 months like most engines). But i can't see how 350kw would be unreliable if it was driven to work and back, with a bit of fun on the weekend for 2 or 3 years. I don't intend on thrashing the car. It's too nice to do it to. And obviously it's not going to be making huge power all of the time. Boost would be wound back for the daily commute, and wound up a bit if some fun was required. I think it'd be safe to say if the compression is good, and the leak down test looks ok, that it should handle a bit of power for a while? I don't think i'll keep the car for 10 years or so because there are other cars i'd like to own in this life time as well. But i don't want to thrash and abuse it and flog it in 3 months.

I'd prefer not to have to rebuild it. I actually work with a guy who did his apprenticeship at Nissan and has rebuilt GTR motors. And being a mechanic by trade, it wouldn't be too bad if i had to rebuild it myself.

If its the odd blast, it will last definately as you say.

Generally thats how it goes. Extended use (track/drag/high.constant RPM cars) sees motors die a lot faster.

Depends on the use of the car really.

If your streeting only, just spend the $$$ to have it tuned correctly. Thats what will save the motor and i should be ok for the odd squirt. Just dont have an extended squirt :P

Its when you hit the track (circuit/drag) that youll shorten the life.

stock rods etc are fine upto 450rwkw

Spot on Ash

We made over 460awkw a couple of weeks ago on stock rods...just make sure they are serviceable and suitable aftermarket rod bolts are used. Ive never heard of an RB26 stock rod failure due to its weakness, generally its another cause that causes it to fail.

Funny you mention that Paul, where i take my car (as you know) never seen a rod spit either :P

It the bolts themselves that go first i believe, and then its not the rod that actually breaks. Its the tuning or similar that stresses it to a point of fauile, not a part fauile itself :P

If its the odd blast, it will last definately as you say.

Generally thats how it goes. Extended use (track/drag/high.constant RPM cars) sees motors die a lot faster.

Depends on the use of the car really.

If your streeting only, just spend the $$$ to have it tuned correctly. Thats what will save the motor and i should be ok for the odd squirt. Just dont have an extended squirt :P

Its when you hit the track (circuit/drag) that youll shorten the life.

I'm new to these RB's, but i've been reading alot. Common sense told me these engines are the same as everything else. Keep good oil in it, make sure oil pressure and compression is ok (and combustion chamber sealing), keep it cool, don't over rev or use to much boost and it will last. Sounds good. At the moment, the car will be just a street car. I may take it to a track day to have a play, but wouldn't get too serious until i have replaced the oil pump and water pump with N1 units. The timing belt has just been replaced on the one i'm looking at buying which sucks. If i knew it was going to be for sale, i would've paid to get them replaced at the same time seeing as i'm probably going to buy it. Will be interesting to get the scope down the plug hole and see what it looks like. Should tell me alot!

I guess a more regular problem with that sort of power level is oil and water pump? Or is that more to do with rpm than power? How hard is the oil pump to replace?

How easy are rod bolts to replace? Sump off, remove and replace? I guess you'd replace bearings while you were there?

How hard is the oil pump to replace?

Simple...once you pull the engine out.

My tip...if the thing is seeing work (i.e. track or drag) pull the engine and freshen it up with new bearings, rings, rod bolts etc...do your oil and water pumps and you will see the engine live a happy thrashing day after day. If you dont do it beforehand you will later (when it fails) and may break you budget a lot harder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...