Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a friend who has made a bet with me. I won't say which side I am on but here is the question I have.

Is there such a thing as a Skyline GTS-T without a turbo? In any model/year...

This may sound like a very simple question, as I am aware the second T stands for turbo, but apparently there is a "poverty pack" available that people can buy with GTS-T's that come with no turbo and non-turbo running gear. I need to know if this is a fact, and if this "poverty pack" was released direct from the manufacturer. Thanks in advance for your help...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83718-gts-t-without-a-turbo/
Share on other sites

I have a friend who has made a bet with me. I won't say which side I am on but here is the question I have.

Is there such a thing as a Skyline GTS-T without a turbo? In any model/year...

This may sound like a very simple question, as I am aware the second T stands for turbo, but apparently there is a "poverty pack" available that people can buy with GTS-T's that come with no turbo and non-turbo running gear. I need to know if this is a fact, and if this "poverty pack" was released direct from the manufacturer. Thanks in advance for your help...

we call it NO LAG SKYLINES :lol:

come to N/A section of the forum then we will show you what is capable of with SKYLINES without those over rated laggy hair driers.... :)

hahah

N/A mod :)

Thanks for the replies guys, however, as I mentioned in my first post, I am aware that the second 'T' stands for Turbo. The reason I ask is because in one of the more recent Fast Fours Magazine editions, there was a letter written by someone who had purchased a GTS-T that came without a turbo from Japan. When he asked if there are Skylines without Turbos that are still called GTS-T's, the response was that there were some with what is called a 'poverty pack'. A GTS-T without a turbo... All I need to know is if anyone can confirm or deny this with any reference to a reliable web-page/article etc...

Sorry to be a pain, and as I know, it seems like a simple question but this response in the magazine has knocked me off a bit...

Edited by JMP 82

The poverty pack is the GTS. As in all cars there is a reason for the Gt, GTR, IS, GTS tec they are an indication of what is in the car. There would be no real reason to badge it as a GTS-T with no turbo or any of the extra gear, iebrakes. Who ever says that there is an NA GTS-t is slightly confusted. It would be like making a BMW 325is without the 2.7 engine, ABS, upgraded breaks or anything. It would just be a 325i then

the skyline did come out in a non-turbo form YES.

its known as a GST..... hence no T for turbo.

GST ROFL!!! :lol: the government taxed the turbo in importation. haha

sorry couldnt resist!

  • 4 months later...
The poverty pack is the GTS.

the poverty pack R32 is actually the GXi, which in base model came with awesome drum brakes and steel wheels with hubcaps. It has a 1.8L CA18i engine.

in the R33's the poverty pack came with an RB20E called a GTE.

in the R34's it was the GT which came with a RB20DE Neo engine.

Non turbo RWD R32's and single turbo RWD R32's have the same chassis designation, ie HR32 or HCR32. The only thing that sets em apart to the unweary eye is the badge on the boot. Most people that import cars run chassis' through the Nissan VIN database to check the car's production details prior to purchasing for this reason.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...