Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

all you p platers.. if your driving a r33 and its illegal ya ? and your name is on the insurance policy im pretty sure the insurance company isnt gonna pay you out anything if you ever need it :P

its the same as all those people with illegal mods listed on there insurance policy :huh:

it depends on the insurance company if they are smart or not, ive known a few r33 gtst p platers to make claims and its gone through fine with no dramas, most dont honour it or check it

My 32 GTR is on my Dads name, 33 GTST is on my Mums name (helps with insurance too)

I've been driving turbo imports since I was 16, the issue has never come up.

Dunno if they let u register cars that are over the limit on your own name or not, pretty sure they haven't got a clue and allow it.

OMG GT-R your my hero

read the fine print.

My 32 GTR is on my Dads name, 33 GTST is on my Mums name (helps with insurance too)

I've been driving turbo imports since I was 16, the issue has never come up.

Dunno if they let u register cars that are over the limit on your own name or not, pretty sure they haven't got a clue and allow it.

the insurance is based on the youngest driver so having it your parents name means sweet f a, the insurance companies kinda fixed that loop hole probably about 10 years ago when every man and his dog was doing it. since 16 hey so youve had a valid full licence at 16, not bad consider vic you can't get one till 18.

by law you can't drive any car that is over power to wieght ratio on p-plates. that does not take into consideration age or the cars engine swap etc. you could be 35 and on your p plates cos youve lost your licence to drink driving so therefore you cant' drive a car over 125kw per tonne cos your still on your p's regardless of age. its not enforced very well and most cops don't do anything, some do.

some insurance comparies know about it and will insure any driver and any car and then when you make a claim reject it if you were driving and your licence type does not permit you to drive said vehicle. i have seen a few where said driver is not permitted by law to drive said vehicle and they've made a claim and its fine been. so its really case by case and a risk to some extent for p plater r33 gtst owners

some insurance comparies know about it and will insure any driver and any car and then when you make a claim reject it if you were driving and your licence type does not permit you to drive said vehicle. i have seen a few where said driver is not permitted by law to drive said vehicle and they've made a claim and its fine been. so its really case by case and a risk to some extent for p plater r33 gtst owners

uh oh... :D

why uh oh? you didnt know about that?

i knew about the power to weight laws etc....just thought that if they were going to insure you, they should accept ur claim.

its a load of shit. they know when they accept you that the power/weight law is in place, but they'll happily take the premium, then not pay up when its time to make a claim...

that is criminal

just because you insure the car in your name doesnt necessarily mean you will be the one driving it, for all they know you could be dumb and insure it under your name but your mum is driving it, so in that case it will apply by law she may (well most likely) be permitted by law to drive the car. the insurance company could prolly find out pretty easily which policies are automatically void based on car and driver licence type but they dont seem to care, even at claim stage they just yeah ok approved

just because you insure the car in your name doesnt necessarily mean you will be the one driving it, for all they know you could be dumb and insure it under your name but your mum is driving it, so in that case it will apply by law she may (well most likely) be permitted by law to drive the car. the insurance company could prolly find out pretty easily which policies are automatically void based on car and driver licence type but they dont seem to care, even at claim stage they just yeah ok approved

yes and no. on the policy you list 1 driver, with 0 others to be driving the car. then you list the age of the youngest driver, and its not hard to work out the rest.

either way, lets just hope i dont even have to try my luck, and never make a claim

An insurance company will find the smallest thing in the world not to pay, so good luck getting a cent out of them. Even if your window tint is too dark they can refuse to pay and your left on your ass...

An insurance company will find the smallest thing in the world not to pay, so good luck getting a cent out of them. Even if your window tint is too dark they can refuse to pay and your left on your ass...

werd.

its hit and miss, if your on your P's and drive a car like we do that in reality is illegal for us to drive anyways, insurance is a win lose situation, you may get lucky, you may get stung bad, it depends, the easiest way... is to not drive like a dick and smash your car therefore you wont have to put in an insurance claim. and if by chance you do ( which god forbid ) then its a gamble, thats all there is to it.

werd.

its hit and miss, if your on your P's and drive a car like we do that in reality is illegal for us to drive anyways, insurance is a win lose situation, you may get lucky, you may get stung bad, it depends, the easiest way... is to not drive like a dick and smash your car therefore you wont have to put in an insurance claim. and if by chance you do ( which god forbid ) then its a gamble, thats all there is to it.

thats exactly how i see it....i know its risky, it just sucks...

if someone hits you though, like from behind so they're at fault, is there any issue there?

thats exactly how i see it....i know its risky, it just sucks...

if someone hits you though, like from behind so they're at fault, is there any issue there?

Yeah but if they hit you from behind and there is another car infront of you and you hit them. The guy that hit you has to pay you and you have to pay the person that u got pushed into. I still think that is complete bullshit but thats how it is. I think the driver that caused it in the first place should pay for the whole accident because it is a result of them. Which comes to the point, they hit you, their insurance pays for you but then your insurance (since you driving an illegal car) can refuse to pay out for someone elses car, then your stuck in debt. So sometimes being careful is just not enough...

Yeah but if they hit you from behind and there is another car infront of you and you hit them. The guy that hit you has to pay you and you have to pay the person that u got pushed into. I still think that is complete bullshit but thats how it is. I think the driver that caused it in the first place should pay for the whole accident because it is a result of them. Which comes to the point, they hit you, their insurance pays for you but then your insurance (since you driving an illegal car) can refuse to pay out for someone elses car, then your stuck in debt. So sometimes being careful is just not enough...

This is what happened to me in my old R31 a few years ago, i was the car in front.

If you are completely stopped, and you are hit from behind and are pushed into the car in front of you, its not your fault. Both cars are claimed on the guy that hit you's insurance.

I guess this is because as you are completely stopped, any distance between you and the car infront of you is a safe distance.

I just got my r32gtst coupe registered yesterday (for the second time....f**k you vicroads) and yeah apparently my cars illegal, and they clearly don't care..

A r32 gtst is not illegal, its under the limit.

This is what happened to me in my old R31 a few years ago, i was the car in front.

If you are completely stopped, and you are hit from behind and are pushed into the car in front of you, its not your fault. Both cars are claimed on the guy that hit you's insurance.

I guess this is because as you are completely stopped, any distance between you and the car infront of you is a safe distance.

Never heard of that. In each case I have seen, while not your fault, it is claimed off your insurance.

Insurance is guilty until proven innocent :)

I dont mind as I am old so insurance doesnt cost me much now! ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...