Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah that's what I thought.. I was hoping somebody had similair cause all my measurements tell me it will fit but I'm not 100% certain and I'm a bit skeptical... If I go plus 30 I'll have to run camber or stretch I'm thinking... I guess if I go+41 I can always get a spacer

fairly new to all this.. I have a r34 gtt and im looking at running 18x10+41 rear and 18x9+25 front I want to run minimum amount of stretch and camber, Ive already rolled the guards all round and im running nismo s tune suspension

Short answer on the rears? No.

For a rule of thumb, 18x9.5+25 is pretty much FLUSH with the guards, front and rear at 0 camber. Bearing in mind unless you have camber arms on the rears, as you lower it, it will camber in a few degrees. Fronts can be adjustable through most aftermarket suspension types by around +/- 2 degrees.

So your 18x9+25 is great for the front, and depending on how much you lower it will depend on the amount of stretch you will need. If you want to be eating gravel, you will probably need 225s on it. Which is a fair amount of stretch.

Rears - These will be very close to the suspension, especially if you don't stretch the tyres. If you want 18x10 badly, you need an offset of 30 or less. I had 18x10.5+30 with 245/40, and it fit, but I don't believe there was much clearance AND it was sitting around 5-10mm outside the guards even with around 2 degrees of camber. Your 18x10s will sit 15mm INSIDE the guards, even with 0 camber, which in my mind defeats the purpose of having a fat rim and tyre combo.

Go 18x9+25 all round IMHO. It will be a safe choice, and you can put fatter tyres on the rears if you needed to.

18x10+41 is 10mm further into the guards than 9.5, I'll be running a 265 tyre, that's pretty much the biggest I'll fit.. I'm not going ridiculously low probably keep it around 110mm off the ground, so that should be okay there... If I get these wheels and worst case scenario I'll just have to run spacers I guess

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been rolling around with stretched tyres on my 33 for a while now, haven't really had issues but just for track work stretched is a no-go so I'm looking into some semi-slicks.

9.5 +22 on the front

10.5 +30 on the rears.

Looking at getting some 265/40R18 for the rear, what's my best bet for the fronts? Got 225's on there atm I think, thinking they might need at least 245's but unsure what to look for. Anyone got a good idea of what will work best?

I've been rolling around with stretched tyres on my 33 for a while now, haven't really had issues but just for track work stretched is a no-go so I'm looking into some semi-slicks.

9.5 +22 on the front

10.5 +30 on the rears.

Looking at getting some 265/40R18 for the rear, what's my best bet for the fronts? Got 225's on there atm I think, thinking they might need at least 245's but unsure what to look for. Anyone got a good idea of what will work best?

To run those sizes without stretch you are going to need to raise the car up, it won't be able to sit as low as the tyres will be outside the guards.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I would run 275s on the rear, more traction the better, especially for track. And 255s on the front. Not sure how much stretch is considered stretch?

18x9.5+12 on a r34 gtt with rolled guards and adjustable coilovers - on the rears. (Fronts I am going 18x9,5+20)

I had 18x10.5+30, and that was poking around 5-10mm with natural lowered camber, I feel the +12 will be too much. Anyone else had experience with this aggressive offset?

Was running 245/40 to fit the 10's in the guards.

Edited by sleptema

I ran 18x9.5+12 all round w 235/40/18 R33 gtst

best offset for stock guards IMHO

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/412682-300-rwkw-gtst-top-shelf-parts-only-price-drop-for-members/

guards are practically the same

18x9.5+12 on a r34 gtt with rolled guards and adjustable coilovers - on the rears. (Fronts I am going 18x9,5+20)

I had 18x10.5+30, and that was poking around 5-10mm with natural lowered camber, I feel the +12 will be too much. Anyone else had experience with this aggressive offset?

Was running 245/40 to fit the 10's in the guards.

Remember that going from 10.5 to 9.5 will pull the wheels in, if the offset remains the same.

ie) a wheel 18x10.5 +30 will have the same poke as 18x9.5 +17

So if you are going for 18x9.5 +12 it will poke 5mm more than your 18x10.5 +30

Edited by Jazzadub

Remember that going from 10.5 to 9.5 will pull the wheels in, if the offset remains the same.

ie) a wheel 18x10.5 +30 will have the same poke as 18x9.5 +17

So if you are going for 18x9.5 +12 it will poke 5mm more than your 18x10.5 +30

Yes.

I ran 18x9.5+12 all round w 235/40/18 R33 gtst

best offset for stock guards IMHO

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/412682-300-rwkw-gtst-top-shelf-parts-only-price-drop-for-members/

guards are practically the same

Car looks good, I want 'more dish' look on rears, so I will be going +20 fronts and +12 rears. Cheers for the help guys.

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys..

I need some advice here..

I have a dilemma to choose between 2 wheels options..

1. 18x8.5 +30 front with 235/40 and 18x9.5 +35 rear with 265/35

or

2. 18x10 +25 all rounds

which types are the most suitable enough for 1993 R33 GTST without any major modifications?

I have stock suspensions..

I'm sorry if I asked to much here, I'm a R33 newbie :D

So your first option is conservative, same as what I'm running at the moment.. Front will sit in the guard a fair bit, rear will be flush with a little low.

Then you're second option is like bam! Super aggressive, especially for the fronts. Dunno if I've read anyone fitting a 18x10+25 in the front of a gtst

hi guys..

I need some advice here..

I have a dilemma to choose between 2 wheels options..

1. 18x8.5 +30 front with 235/40 and 18x9.5 +35 rear with 265/35

or

2. 18x10 +25 all rounds

which types are the most suitable enough for 1993 R33 GTST without any major modifications?

I have stock suspensions..

I'm sorry if I asked to much here, I'm a R33 newbie :D

Do you want to drive your car or park it in a Maccas car park?

Do you want to drive your car or park it in a Maccas car park?

absolutely I want to drive it mate..

So your first option is conservative, same as what I'm running at the moment.. Front will sit in the guard a fair bit, rear will be flush with a little low.

Then you're second option is like bam! Super aggressive, especially for the fronts. Dunno if I've read anyone fitting a 18x10+25 in the front of a gtst

18x10+25 won't fit with no suspension or guard work

18x10 on a gts is a bit too aggressive. Mate was running 18x10.5 +24 and it was stuck out a good inch and a half

It's very do able with the right components and set up

hi guys, thanks a lot for your advice..

so big no for 18x10, maybe I will take the option 1..

honesty I'm still looking for 17x9 but still don't get it here..

:D

Dunno if I've read anyone fitting a 18x10+25 in the front of a gtst

heaps of people have done 18*10+xx it on stock metal... takes work though

fwiw it's less agressive than the 9.5+12's on my old car (photos in link on last page i think)

will be within around 5mm of the UCA

with a Potenza 245/40/19, how large a wheel would you think will work with some stretch?

9.5? 10"?

im thinking of putting 10 on the rear and 9.5 on the front, with offset asside will the tires work or is that too extreme do you think?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
×
×
  • Create New...