Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

depends.... 265 on 10+38 and 0 deg camber + guards level with tyres will require a roll and a bit of a push, more than just a lip.

depends on how agressive you go.

285 and you will have to be fairly aggressive or flare

33gtst guards are fairly generous when rolling,

I'd say you would easily be able to get the 265's without flaring as long as you pump the whole guard out a bit.

need to roll then set the guard roller high up in the guard and use it to push the whole area.

I had 18 x 9.5 +12 w 235/40 and tyres tucked a little with almost 0 camber and 0 scrub from pumping the guards

this is slightly more aggressive than what you are looking at with the 265's and with 285's the outside top edge of the tyre will sit in approximately the same spot, but with a slightly bulged sidewall.

reference:

http://www.willtheyfit.com/index.php?width=235&aspect=40&diameter=18&wheelwidth=9.5&offset=12&width2=285&aspect2=35&diameter2=18&wheelwidth2=10&offset2=38#content

so yeah, for the 285's it's possible without flaring but you would need a serious pump

The 34 took 275/35 on the rear with no hassle at all, the 285 have a larger rolling diameter too, 265/35 is closest to factory i think...

  On 18/02/2014 at 12:47 AM, niZmO_Man said:

Run 265, roll the guards and don't be afraid of using a bit of neg camber (-0.5°).

I run this setup and it hooks up OKish with 265 RSR, well once its through 3rd anyhow, with a better tyre and better throttle control i think itll be pretty good!

Brief update, which seems kind of relevant given recent questions on 265s.

This is 18x10 +38 with 265/35. Have recently had suspension adjusted and now at zero camber on rear. Before was more than 2deg, didn't realise was that much :blink:

Still no problems at all with rubbing after adjustment, have had a fairly light roll, no pull or flare.

Before and after

post-83859-0-02147100-1392812089_thumb.jpgpost-83859-0-69803500-1392812124_thumb.jpg

View from the top. Poking by maybe 5 mm.

post-83859-0-79516000-1392812175_thumb.jpg

  On 19/02/2014 at 11:25 PM, joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo said:

yeh, I was referring to a low car saying it will need to be pulled :)

True true. Mine is lowered (hence the previous 2deg+ camber), but not that low as you can see from pics.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
    • Well, the NA RB25 is nothing special in terms of the amount of power it makes stock, nor with any easy mods like extractors & exhaust, opening up the intake tract, etc, etc. And just like any small capacity NA engine, getting lots of power out of them takes a fair bit of money and, depending on how far you go with big cams and high compression and so on, quite grumpy to drive. So, boost is the answer. Many many many of them have had a turbo added. This is easy enough. Same as for any engine. Need the things you need to bolt on the turbo of choice, fuel system and management upgrades, clutch, stronger gearbox ( you do not want to run a boost RB25 through the NA box), diff, brakes, etc, etc, same as you would for most other NA+T things. Some much smaller number have had a supercharger added instead. These are good and cool, but have nowhere near the potential of the turbo route. All the same required upgrades apply. So, potential? Anywhere from not much to quite a lot, depending on how much effort and expense you want to go to. Is there value in the effort and expense? Objectively, no, there is not. If you're gaining enjoyment and don't mind blowing a lot of money on the project, then that's where the value is. Parts? Nissan dealers for some. Many many on-line vendors who do Japanese manufacturer spares (buy buying them from disposals at dealers around the world, direct from manufacturers, increasingly from Chinese knockoffs, etc) and warehousing them in Dubai or similar places. Amayama, Partsouk, etc etc. There are quite a few. Some local to Australia, some local to Europe, some local to the US. You can upgrade literally everything. For an NA, unless you're going to boost it, there's little point going past a nice exhaust, as I said above. After that (well, actually probably even before that) you should concentrate on making it handle the best it can, good brake components, light wheels and tyres, and just make it something to enjoy throwing through the curves. You'll never, ever win any drag races, so it needs to be taken as a nice point-to-point car. Throw in some Recaros or Brides, nice Momo wheel and gearknob, so it's pleasant to be in (because god knows, the inside of an R33 is not a pretty place!!) and away you go.
    • How many $$$ do you have to slip cams to logbook a car that’s not the orginal to the 1990 standard lol
    • Thanks for the update I truly appreciate it. I was trying to figure out the sensors. 
×
×
  • Create New...