Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Found this...

18x9.5 +15

post-16535-0-03996200-1311747147.jpg

post-16535-0-17972900-1311747172.jpg

Not what i'd call a "dick load", some camber and you'd get em under. Depends what you're after exactly. RPF1's are the shit though, and worth the effort. They look good on anything.

Theres more here in this thread.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372204-r32-gtst-fitment-pics-please/

Edited by R31 drift pig

And you forgot the part where he says it doesn't have camber arms etc, so some camber and suddenly they're not sticking out.

2.5 - 3 degrees up front and a smidge in the back and done. Dynamic camber will take care of the rest.

Be pretty silly to put them on and not put in a decent alignment.

Cheers for the replies.

Wanted to go 18s in the RPF1s but dont think they have anything that will fit the 32 or without them going ummm concave out wards if that makes sense. feel they look ugly going that way

So my choice, i think my only choice are 17x9 +22 all round?

Will these be ok? any other choices?

Skyline model = R32 GTR
Wheel diameter = 17
Wheel width =9
Wheel offset =+22 TE37
Tyre size =255/40/17 nankang ultra sport NS II
Modifications to fit = none

003XetH.jpg

rear:

z9R1kBf.jpg

front: kind of sunk in

YjLzbXy.jpg

Erxv6Au.jpg

*Looks 10x better than above setup.

Skyline model = R32 GTR
Wheel diameter = 18
Wheel width =9.5
Wheel offset =+12 Advan RG
Tyre size =265/35/18 Advan AD08R
Modifications to fit = light fender roll. Just the lips, nothing more. A few degrees of camber could also maybe fix the problem. I am not sure of my current specs.

Front:

RnPzL4z.jpg

Rear: Perfectly flush

ostZl4r.jpg

ZAihvJ9.jpg

DzD09LO.jpg

WG4gf0O.jpg

hTAkKuW.jpg

Edited by JTCC
  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Recently came across this car while browsing on a used car trading website in HK. I understand the pictiure is kinda grainy, but could anyone make out the approx wheel and tire specs on the car? Also does anyone know what brand of wheel it is. Looks good imo. Thanks!

post-141346-0-22857500-1445483485_thumb.jpg

Edited by roy2535

Hey guys I've got my mind set on Enkei's RPF1's in 18's. I'm having trouble finding what offset I need and I don't want to roll the rear guards. Also I want the correct tyre sizes because I want a functional setup.

It's asking for a lot, but I want it to be perfect.

Edit: 18x9's all round be asking too much?

Edited by Dan93

Damn no good. Those tyres will be too skinny.

At the moment it's got 17x8.5's on the front with 235's I think and 17x9's on the rear with 255's.

No idea on offset, but you can get a slightly angled finger in between the rear tyre and guard.

It all comes down to usage/what you want.

End of the day you can get a better 235/40/18 that will grip more than a 255 for the same price due to the common size discount.

I ran 235 NT05's, low with a decent sussy setup (6/8 coils, camber bushes, pineapples, sways, hicas lock) and had traction right through second with 330rwkw

  On 23/10/2015 at 12:17 PM, Dan93 said:

I don't like the idea of a tyre being smaller than it should be. I obviously want it to look good and tyre fitment needs to be spot on. I'm not worried about paying more for a wider tyre.

What kind of power are we talking?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...