Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I cbf quoting a few points, so i will just state my opinion on a couple of issues raised and hopefully you know what i am refering to. :D

1/ At 14psi i honesty do not think you will reach 250rwkw, i think you may require about 18psi.

Damn i was close to the mark B) , bit more tuning, 18psi and 250 is acheivable :D.

Good result, you should be very happy with that kind of power. Still waiting to get mine back :O, but i am doing a few mods :D

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh i am pretty happy with the results, and i think with the cams i should reach close too the 250rwkw mark..... plus i dont wanna push the car much more anyways, well not until i get myself a new bottom end, and wack in some more boost and maybe even a new plenum...

i understand wat u mean, i have been waiting for about 2 months for my car to be finished, i had heaps of work done...

yeh i asked to be safe, i dont want the bottom end to give way on me just yet.... im planning to rebuild the engine with some forgies and rods, and even maybe some cams... then ill up the boost a little and push for the 300rwkw...

just a few questions -

1. What size Exhaust housing are you using? Its it a .63 or a .8*

2. What size compressor housing are you using?

3. And what kind of turbo is it? Garret or HKS? Is it 550 hp?

Just wondering, as I am bolting one on this weekend. (garret GT30, with a .63 ass end)

i used a garret GT30R, its ball bearing, i dunno if urs is, but its the 550hp version, and i used a .82 rear housing, not sure about the compressor, its a little laggy but man when it hits full boost its amazing... a .63 rear will be heaps better and less laggy.... by the way nothing will bolt straight on, it takes a lot more work then u first think.

yeah we know, need spacers, oil and water lines, new intake, pretty much a lot of work.

I got the VG30 rear so it will use my custom dump and flange.

The my mate that is doing it, is a boiler maker \ fabricator. He's built a 300rwkw rb25 from the ground up, a GTiR motor with a 600hp turbo from the ground up, done shit loads of jobs on VLs, GT starlets, Falcons, Holdens etc.

Bit of a back yarder, and I have never EVER seen work from trust, apexi, HKS or whatever brand that is better than his work.

Guess I'm lucky to have a mate like that hey.. heh..

He's one of those quiet types, you know, the decent ones.

I'm a little worried though. I wanted to get about 250rwkw with about 1 bar of boost and a good tune. The car runs really well (2% leakdown with 169psi accross all cyclinders) and the mods I have provided for the upgrade are -

Garett GT30 550hp (VG30 rear end)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Apexi Power FC

Full exhaust, split custom dump, hi flo cat

Full 4 inch intake and partitioned pod filter

Q45 AFM (90mm)

FMIC

Unopened motor

I'm one of those types, that thinks the less boost the better, as less boost equals less engine wear because its not being forced as hard.

Also, running boost above 16psi on a stocko rb25 is dangerous... As Blown gaskets, and bent rods is just around the corner...

I really don't want to have to open the motor up. if I did, I would bother upgrading, I'd just leave it at 210rwkw and sell the car

Edited by The Mafia
its a little laggy but man when it hits full boost its amazing... a .63 rear will be heaps better and less laggy.... by the way nothing will bolt straight on, it takes a lot more work then u first think.

a .63 would be worse to drive on the street.

It ramps up just that little bit earlier and then wheelspin in an issue. A few people have seen this with a .63

The .82 from all reports is definately the way to go if you can, if not then .63 you'll have to get used to with the right foot :(

It wont be "that" much sooner in response. The way it'll deliver power will be sharper though.

yeah we know, need spacers, oil and water lines, new intake, pretty much a lot of work.

I got the VG30 rear so it will use my custom dump and flange.

The my mate that is doing it, is a boiler maker \ fabricator. He's built a 300rwkw rb25 from the ground up, a GTiR motor with a 600hp turbo from the ground up, done shit loads of jobs on VLs, GT starlets, Falcons, Holdens etc.

Bit of a back yarder, and I have never EVER seen work from trust, apexi, HKS or whatever brand that is better than his work.

Guess I'm lucky to have a mate like that hey.. heh..

He's one of those quiet types, you know, the decent ones.

I'm a little worried though. I wanted to get about 250rwkw with about 1 bar of boost and a good tune. The car runs really well (2% leakdown with 169psi accross all cyclinders) and the mods I have provided for the upgrade are -

Garett GT30 550hp (VG30 rear end)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Apexi Power FC

Full exhaust, split custom dump, hi flo cat

Full 4 inch intake and partitioned pod filter

Q45 AFM (90mm)

FMIC

Unopened motor

I'm one of those types, that thinks the less boost the better, as less boost equals less engine wear because its not being forced as hard.

Also, running boost above 16psi on a stocko rb25 is dangerous... As Blown gaskets, and bent rods is just around the corner...

I really don't want to have to open the motor up. if I did, I would bother upgrading, I'd just leave it at 210rwkw and sell the car

to be honest i dont think the .63 is much better, and also i dont think 250rwkw is possible at 1 bar, with the mods provided... i havent reached 250 yet and im running over 16psi...

this is scary. almost double the turbo size, and only get 30rwkw?

I have a ex cam gear too if that makes any difference. At 0 degrees at he moment. Let just hope my tuner can do what is needed.

As I said, I'm running 210rwkw at only 12psi on a stocko turbo..

You shouldn't need to run over 16psi on a turbo twice the size to get 250rwkw.. ??

I guess we can only see what my tuner comes up with.

this is scary. almost double the turbo size, and only get 30rwkw?

I have a ex cam gear too if that makes any difference. At 0 degrees at he moment. Let just hope my tuner can do what is needed.

As I said, I'm running 210rwkw at only 12psi on a stocko turbo..

You shouldn't need to run over 16psi on a turbo twice the size to get 250rwkw.. ??

I guess we can only see what my tuner comes up with.

Throw it on the dyno you made 210rwkw and you will make 300+ with the GT3O :P:D:D

jk

Throw it on the dyno you made 210rwkw and you will make 300+ with the GT3O :P:D:D

jk

You may "say" you're joking, but it is probably true.

A while ago I was running ecu, stock turbo, 13psi, and usual mods. On my mechanic's dyno it made a solid 183rwkw and felt strong. A week later I went to a dyno day and it made 214rwkw (same fuel, etc). Now that was a joke, dynos are only good as a tunning tool. On dyno days it is good to compare your car to others, as they are all run on the same dyno, by the same driver, on the same day. That is the only time you can compare figures, otherwise a peak power comparison ain't shit.

The Mafia: So once you upgrade your turbo, take it to the same dyno and compare and evaluate the result, but don't be disappointed if you take it to another dyno and "mysteriously" loss 30rwkw.

hey mass ill run ya lol :huh:

congrats on the mods, wat dyno was it run on? was it MRTs hub dyno?

na it was a dyno dynamics dyno, dont know where tho have to check, i think in padstow....thanks, hows ur car going...

Not sure, but i had a mechanic do 2 consecutive runs, one in "shoot out" mode, the other "normal", their was only a 4rwkw differance btw the two.

Also we did a run in 4th, the 3rd and there was only a 2rwkw differance. Provided the tunner is honest and tell the dyno the run is in third :huh:

The Mafia , count the number of compressor blades and hope it has 6 , 6 full and 6 half height . The Garrett people believe that the GT30R (700382-12) needs an 82 or 1.06 rear housing not to choke its potential .

Running the VG30 BB housing is a grey area because its native turbine is much smaller in diametre and the machined away nozzle may not want to know about the GT30 turbine . If you run the Garrett GT30 .63ARR housing surge may not be too far away . From a convienence point of view the HKS integral gate GT Pro S housings stand the best chance of working properly , their nozzles and volutes are different read better than Garretts Diesel housings .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi soviet_merlin, We appreciate your concern regarding this possibly being some sort of PR/Political hype, I assure you that is not the case, I wish we could claim something like that, but in this case, we merely reached out for comment on the basis of the outrage we too felt, as those heavily in the automotive industry. Ps. the original source in the social media post is CarExpert not CarExplore.    Best, CE.
    • Made a bit of a discovery, but while I was cruising, I randomly decided to test to see if it worked and it showed up on my IC7. The entire time I tested it before, I never thought to turn the ignition on. I only tested it with head lights turned on but with the ignition off. Huge oversight on my end. I’m a dummy. I know. 
    • G'day all, I have drilled and tapped the hole for the relocation of the timing belt tensioner. That was straight forward. I'm unsure if I need to also put another hole for the smaller stud that the spring behind the tensioner catches on (this is how it seems to work in its original spot). Or do you not use the spring behind it and just torque it down? Thanks in advance, I did a search but couldn't find anything related and it doesn't mention it in the rb30det sau guide.
    • Hi All,  just thought I would provide an update as I know smooth (Matt) was on this forum from 2003.    my brother Matthew passed away end of may 2024 at the age of 41 from liver failure. I am not sure how many of his original team krazy friends are still on here or active but thought it reasonable to let the forum know.    if you have any photos or pictures it would be great if you could share them.    it took me a while to work out he was active on here.    thanks so much 
    • Hi All,  just thought I would provide an update as I know smooth (Matt) was on this forum from 2003.    my brother Matthew passed away end of may 2024 at the age of 41 from liver failure. I am not sure how many of his original team krazy friends are still on here or active but thought it reasonable to let the forum know.    if you have any photos or pictures it would be great if you could share them.    it took me a while to work out he was active on here.    thanks so much   
×
×
  • Create New...