Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 Gtst 250rwkw Gt30r


mass_iv
 Share

Recommended Posts

I cbf quoting a few points, so i will just state my opinion on a couple of issues raised and hopefully you know what i am refering to. :D

1/ At 14psi i honesty do not think you will reach 250rwkw, i think you may require about 18psi.

Damn i was close to the mark B) , bit more tuning, 18psi and 250 is acheivable :D.

Good result, you should be very happy with that kind of power. Still waiting to get mine back :O, but i am doing a few mods :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh i am pretty happy with the results, and i think with the cams i should reach close too the 250rwkw mark..... plus i dont wanna push the car much more anyways, well not until i get myself a new bottom end, and wack in some more boost and maybe even a new plenum...

i understand wat u mean, i have been waiting for about 2 months for my car to be finished, i had heaps of work done...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeh i asked to be safe, i dont want the bottom end to give way on me just yet.... im planning to rebuild the engine with some forgies and rods, and even maybe some cams... then ill up the boost a little and push for the 300rwkw...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a few questions -

1. What size Exhaust housing are you using? Its it a .63 or a .8*

2. What size compressor housing are you using?

3. And what kind of turbo is it? Garret or HKS? Is it 550 hp?

Just wondering, as I am bolting one on this weekend. (garret GT30, with a .63 ass end)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i used a garret GT30R, its ball bearing, i dunno if urs is, but its the 550hp version, and i used a .82 rear housing, not sure about the compressor, its a little laggy but man when it hits full boost its amazing... a .63 rear will be heaps better and less laggy.... by the way nothing will bolt straight on, it takes a lot more work then u first think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah we know, need spacers, oil and water lines, new intake, pretty much a lot of work.

I got the VG30 rear so it will use my custom dump and flange.

The my mate that is doing it, is a boiler maker \ fabricator. He's built a 300rwkw rb25 from the ground up, a GTiR motor with a 600hp turbo from the ground up, done shit loads of jobs on VLs, GT starlets, Falcons, Holdens etc.

Bit of a back yarder, and I have never EVER seen work from trust, apexi, HKS or whatever brand that is better than his work.

Guess I'm lucky to have a mate like that hey.. heh..

He's one of those quiet types, you know, the decent ones.

I'm a little worried though. I wanted to get about 250rwkw with about 1 bar of boost and a good tune. The car runs really well (2% leakdown with 169psi accross all cyclinders) and the mods I have provided for the upgrade are -

Garett GT30 550hp (VG30 rear end)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Apexi Power FC

Full exhaust, split custom dump, hi flo cat

Full 4 inch intake and partitioned pod filter

Q45 AFM (90mm)

FMIC

Unopened motor

I'm one of those types, that thinks the less boost the better, as less boost equals less engine wear because its not being forced as hard.

Also, running boost above 16psi on a stocko rb25 is dangerous... As Blown gaskets, and bent rods is just around the corner...

I really don't want to have to open the motor up. if I did, I would bother upgrading, I'd just leave it at 210rwkw and sell the car

Edited by The Mafia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a little laggy but man when it hits full boost its amazing... a .63 rear will be heaps better and less laggy.... by the way nothing will bolt straight on, it takes a lot more work then u first think.

a .63 would be worse to drive on the street.

It ramps up just that little bit earlier and then wheelspin in an issue. A few people have seen this with a .63

The .82 from all reports is definately the way to go if you can, if not then .63 you'll have to get used to with the right foot :(

It wont be "that" much sooner in response. The way it'll deliver power will be sharper though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah we know, need spacers, oil and water lines, new intake, pretty much a lot of work.

I got the VG30 rear so it will use my custom dump and flange.

The my mate that is doing it, is a boiler maker \ fabricator. He's built a 300rwkw rb25 from the ground up, a GTiR motor with a 600hp turbo from the ground up, done shit loads of jobs on VLs, GT starlets, Falcons, Holdens etc.

Bit of a back yarder, and I have never EVER seen work from trust, apexi, HKS or whatever brand that is better than his work.

Guess I'm lucky to have a mate like that hey.. heh..

He's one of those quiet types, you know, the decent ones.

I'm a little worried though. I wanted to get about 250rwkw with about 1 bar of boost and a good tune. The car runs really well (2% leakdown with 169psi accross all cyclinders) and the mods I have provided for the upgrade are -

Garett GT30 550hp (VG30 rear end)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Apexi Power FC

Full exhaust, split custom dump, hi flo cat

Full 4 inch intake and partitioned pod filter

Q45 AFM (90mm)

FMIC

Unopened motor

I'm one of those types, that thinks the less boost the better, as less boost equals less engine wear because its not being forced as hard.

Also, running boost above 16psi on a stocko rb25 is dangerous... As Blown gaskets, and bent rods is just around the corner...

I really don't want to have to open the motor up. if I did, I would bother upgrading, I'd just leave it at 210rwkw and sell the car

to be honest i dont think the .63 is much better, and also i dont think 250rwkw is possible at 1 bar, with the mods provided... i havent reached 250 yet and im running over 16psi...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is scary. almost double the turbo size, and only get 30rwkw?

I have a ex cam gear too if that makes any difference. At 0 degrees at he moment. Let just hope my tuner can do what is needed.

As I said, I'm running 210rwkw at only 12psi on a stocko turbo..

You shouldn't need to run over 16psi on a turbo twice the size to get 250rwkw.. ??

I guess we can only see what my tuner comes up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is scary. almost double the turbo size, and only get 30rwkw?

I have a ex cam gear too if that makes any difference. At 0 degrees at he moment. Let just hope my tuner can do what is needed.

As I said, I'm running 210rwkw at only 12psi on a stocko turbo..

You shouldn't need to run over 16psi on a turbo twice the size to get 250rwkw.. ??

I guess we can only see what my tuner comes up with.

Throw it on the dyno you made 210rwkw and you will make 300+ with the GT3O :P:D:D

jk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Throw it on the dyno you made 210rwkw and you will make 300+ with the GT3O :P:D:D

jk

You may "say" you're joking, but it is probably true.

A while ago I was running ecu, stock turbo, 13psi, and usual mods. On my mechanic's dyno it made a solid 183rwkw and felt strong. A week later I went to a dyno day and it made 214rwkw (same fuel, etc). Now that was a joke, dynos are only good as a tunning tool. On dyno days it is good to compare your car to others, as they are all run on the same dyno, by the same driver, on the same day. That is the only time you can compare figures, otherwise a peak power comparison ain't shit.

The Mafia: So once you upgrade your turbo, take it to the same dyno and compare and evaluate the result, but don't be disappointed if you take it to another dyno and "mysteriously" loss 30rwkw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure, but i had a mechanic do 2 consecutive runs, one in "shoot out" mode, the other "normal", their was only a 4rwkw differance btw the two.

Also we did a run in 4th, the 3rd and there was only a 2rwkw differance. Provided the tunner is honest and tell the dyno the run is in third :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mafia , count the number of compressor blades and hope it has 6 , 6 full and 6 half height . The Garrett people believe that the GT30R (700382-12) needs an 82 or 1.06 rear housing not to choke its potential .

Running the VG30 BB housing is a grey area because its native turbine is much smaller in diametre and the machined away nozzle may not want to know about the GT30 turbine . If you run the Garrett GT30 .63ARR housing surge may not be too far away . From a convienence point of view the HKS integral gate GT Pro S housings stand the best chance of working properly , their nozzles and volutes are different read better than Garretts Diesel housings .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's probably an underlying issue with the A/C system too. I recently fixed mine, now it's fully control by the Haltech and car's factory HVAC controller  Have a squiz here:    
    • And by the way, I've also checked the ECU diagnostic numerous times and got a bad O2 sensor code and initially an Ignition Primary code, which is why I replaced the O2 sensor and all the ignition components (coil packa, plug and loom). No codes have been coming up lately despite the ongoing issue.
    • Hey pber13, unfortunately still no luck. At this point the following has been done with little or no success: - Spark plugs replaced, gapped to 0.8mm - Splitfire coilpacks installed to replace originals - Replaced Ignition Coil/Coilpack harness with a new genuine nissan one - New fuel filter - Replaced AFM/MAF sensor - Injectors have been thoroughly cleaned with an online flush (without removing) - Upper engine and inlet decarbed - blew tons of black smoke out, cleared the carbon deposits from the top of the engine and exhaust.  - IACV removed and thoroughly cleaned with carburettor cleaner - O2 sensor replaced with new and genuine one -  Smoke test revealed no vacuum leaks - Healthy compression test of 160psi across all 6 cylinders Overall the car does run a lot smoother now, no backfires between gear shifts like it did originally... but the rough idle when warmed up is still there. It may not even be a misfire but simply a rough idle. Seems crazy to me that so many people have had this issue and seemingly no one has gotten to the bottom of it, or at least never bothered to post if they did! Hope you have more luck than I did pber13, I'm at a point now where I'm just going to try to ignore it unless it gets worse. Would love to fix it but I've genuinely run out of ideas of what it could be.
    • I got the full frenchys kit too. Really awesome kit. Easy to install my only complaint was the hardlines I think could be routed differently (I modified mine) but I realise the kit needs to suit multiple applications. This was the hard lines before I modified them. They were touching the wastegate pipe. I ended up reducing the distance between firewall and first bend. The made it so they tucked along the frame rail.
    • Deeve, I don't suppose that you've made any progress on this? My Stagea has the exact same problem, and just like you, I've read through as much as I can online, with no real progress. My car isn't throwing any codes at all, which is a little frustrating. I've changed plugs, checked the wiring and harness. A new MAF gets here next week, but I'm not hopeful it will solve the issue.
×
×
  • Create New...