Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I cbf quoting a few points, so i will just state my opinion on a couple of issues raised and hopefully you know what i am refering to. :D

1/ At 14psi i honesty do not think you will reach 250rwkw, i think you may require about 18psi.

Damn i was close to the mark B) , bit more tuning, 18psi and 250 is acheivable :D.

Good result, you should be very happy with that kind of power. Still waiting to get mine back :O, but i am doing a few mods :D

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh i am pretty happy with the results, and i think with the cams i should reach close too the 250rwkw mark..... plus i dont wanna push the car much more anyways, well not until i get myself a new bottom end, and wack in some more boost and maybe even a new plenum...

i understand wat u mean, i have been waiting for about 2 months for my car to be finished, i had heaps of work done...

yeh i asked to be safe, i dont want the bottom end to give way on me just yet.... im planning to rebuild the engine with some forgies and rods, and even maybe some cams... then ill up the boost a little and push for the 300rwkw...

just a few questions -

1. What size Exhaust housing are you using? Its it a .63 or a .8*

2. What size compressor housing are you using?

3. And what kind of turbo is it? Garret or HKS? Is it 550 hp?

Just wondering, as I am bolting one on this weekend. (garret GT30, with a .63 ass end)

i used a garret GT30R, its ball bearing, i dunno if urs is, but its the 550hp version, and i used a .82 rear housing, not sure about the compressor, its a little laggy but man when it hits full boost its amazing... a .63 rear will be heaps better and less laggy.... by the way nothing will bolt straight on, it takes a lot more work then u first think.

yeah we know, need spacers, oil and water lines, new intake, pretty much a lot of work.

I got the VG30 rear so it will use my custom dump and flange.

The my mate that is doing it, is a boiler maker \ fabricator. He's built a 300rwkw rb25 from the ground up, a GTiR motor with a 600hp turbo from the ground up, done shit loads of jobs on VLs, GT starlets, Falcons, Holdens etc.

Bit of a back yarder, and I have never EVER seen work from trust, apexi, HKS or whatever brand that is better than his work.

Guess I'm lucky to have a mate like that hey.. heh..

He's one of those quiet types, you know, the decent ones.

I'm a little worried though. I wanted to get about 250rwkw with about 1 bar of boost and a good tune. The car runs really well (2% leakdown with 169psi accross all cyclinders) and the mods I have provided for the upgrade are -

Garett GT30 550hp (VG30 rear end)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Apexi Power FC

Full exhaust, split custom dump, hi flo cat

Full 4 inch intake and partitioned pod filter

Q45 AFM (90mm)

FMIC

Unopened motor

I'm one of those types, that thinks the less boost the better, as less boost equals less engine wear because its not being forced as hard.

Also, running boost above 16psi on a stocko rb25 is dangerous... As Blown gaskets, and bent rods is just around the corner...

I really don't want to have to open the motor up. if I did, I would bother upgrading, I'd just leave it at 210rwkw and sell the car

Edited by The Mafia
its a little laggy but man when it hits full boost its amazing... a .63 rear will be heaps better and less laggy.... by the way nothing will bolt straight on, it takes a lot more work then u first think.

a .63 would be worse to drive on the street.

It ramps up just that little bit earlier and then wheelspin in an issue. A few people have seen this with a .63

The .82 from all reports is definately the way to go if you can, if not then .63 you'll have to get used to with the right foot :(

It wont be "that" much sooner in response. The way it'll deliver power will be sharper though.

yeah we know, need spacers, oil and water lines, new intake, pretty much a lot of work.

I got the VG30 rear so it will use my custom dump and flange.

The my mate that is doing it, is a boiler maker \ fabricator. He's built a 300rwkw rb25 from the ground up, a GTiR motor with a 600hp turbo from the ground up, done shit loads of jobs on VLs, GT starlets, Falcons, Holdens etc.

Bit of a back yarder, and I have never EVER seen work from trust, apexi, HKS or whatever brand that is better than his work.

Guess I'm lucky to have a mate like that hey.. heh..

He's one of those quiet types, you know, the decent ones.

I'm a little worried though. I wanted to get about 250rwkw with about 1 bar of boost and a good tune. The car runs really well (2% leakdown with 169psi accross all cyclinders) and the mods I have provided for the upgrade are -

Garett GT30 550hp (VG30 rear end)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Apexi Power FC

Full exhaust, split custom dump, hi flo cat

Full 4 inch intake and partitioned pod filter

Q45 AFM (90mm)

FMIC

Unopened motor

I'm one of those types, that thinks the less boost the better, as less boost equals less engine wear because its not being forced as hard.

Also, running boost above 16psi on a stocko rb25 is dangerous... As Blown gaskets, and bent rods is just around the corner...

I really don't want to have to open the motor up. if I did, I would bother upgrading, I'd just leave it at 210rwkw and sell the car

to be honest i dont think the .63 is much better, and also i dont think 250rwkw is possible at 1 bar, with the mods provided... i havent reached 250 yet and im running over 16psi...

this is scary. almost double the turbo size, and only get 30rwkw?

I have a ex cam gear too if that makes any difference. At 0 degrees at he moment. Let just hope my tuner can do what is needed.

As I said, I'm running 210rwkw at only 12psi on a stocko turbo..

You shouldn't need to run over 16psi on a turbo twice the size to get 250rwkw.. ??

I guess we can only see what my tuner comes up with.

this is scary. almost double the turbo size, and only get 30rwkw?

I have a ex cam gear too if that makes any difference. At 0 degrees at he moment. Let just hope my tuner can do what is needed.

As I said, I'm running 210rwkw at only 12psi on a stocko turbo..

You shouldn't need to run over 16psi on a turbo twice the size to get 250rwkw.. ??

I guess we can only see what my tuner comes up with.

Throw it on the dyno you made 210rwkw and you will make 300+ with the GT3O :P:D:D

jk

Throw it on the dyno you made 210rwkw and you will make 300+ with the GT3O :P:D:D

jk

You may "say" you're joking, but it is probably true.

A while ago I was running ecu, stock turbo, 13psi, and usual mods. On my mechanic's dyno it made a solid 183rwkw and felt strong. A week later I went to a dyno day and it made 214rwkw (same fuel, etc). Now that was a joke, dynos are only good as a tunning tool. On dyno days it is good to compare your car to others, as they are all run on the same dyno, by the same driver, on the same day. That is the only time you can compare figures, otherwise a peak power comparison ain't shit.

The Mafia: So once you upgrade your turbo, take it to the same dyno and compare and evaluate the result, but don't be disappointed if you take it to another dyno and "mysteriously" loss 30rwkw.

hey mass ill run ya lol :huh:

congrats on the mods, wat dyno was it run on? was it MRTs hub dyno?

na it was a dyno dynamics dyno, dont know where tho have to check, i think in padstow....thanks, hows ur car going...

Not sure, but i had a mechanic do 2 consecutive runs, one in "shoot out" mode, the other "normal", their was only a 4rwkw differance btw the two.

Also we did a run in 4th, the 3rd and there was only a 2rwkw differance. Provided the tunner is honest and tell the dyno the run is in third :huh:

The Mafia , count the number of compressor blades and hope it has 6 , 6 full and 6 half height . The Garrett people believe that the GT30R (700382-12) needs an 82 or 1.06 rear housing not to choke its potential .

Running the VG30 BB housing is a grey area because its native turbine is much smaller in diametre and the machined away nozzle may not want to know about the GT30 turbine . If you run the Garrett GT30 .63ARR housing surge may not be too far away . From a convienence point of view the HKS integral gate GT Pro S housings stand the best chance of working properly , their nozzles and volutes are different read better than Garretts Diesel housings .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...