Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive searched and could not come up with any answers.

To cut a long story short speaking to a guy on another forum and he reckons that his vl running standard boost will beat most skylines??? is this true? i dont see how, with a vlt being 150kw standard and skyline being 187kw standard?

what is the deal?

Thanks,

Paradizzle.

Sorry if this has already been discussed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/84930-r33-gtst-vs-vl-turbo/
Share on other sites

Exactaly he is denial, and then some other fu*kwit comes into the argument and says his N/A keeps up with them. F*k some people are annoying.

LOL!

The r33 GTS turbo does 6.2, 0-100, 14.2 sec. quarters.

It would not take much to get a VL Turbo to smoke your average 33 in a straight line.

T.

yeh ive own a vlt with high mount to4b,manual,forged motoe and shit,still running standard comp but will go very hard once run in.but anyway b4 it had all that it would never have beat a r33gtst as mates old one was faster for sure

i dont think its possible bcoz stock VLT does 15s. Maybe stock boost on modded VLTs?! My Vl makes 180rwkw-7psi - 245-14psi. Or stocky VLts with FMIC & 3"Exhaust+14psi, will do 13s with auto. that would keep up with lightly moded skyline

What exactly is the point of these XXX vs YYY threads? If you are asking what would run what stock for stock then sure but as people start bringing modifications into it the thread quickly turns to crap...

Edited by sewid
What exactly is the point of these XXX vs YYY threads? If you are asking what would run what stock for stock then sure but as people start bringing modifications into it the thread quickly turns to crap...

exactly. and even if you are asking stock vs stock, it wouldnt take long on the net to find out the stock factory performance figures for any pair of cars.

Sure vlts are potentially very quick, but as said once you bring mods in any POS can run 10's!

lets not get into POS's.

One final word from me...

The VL has absolutely hopeless torsional rigidity and very poorly sorted handling.

It is scary to drive as a stock N/A. Sad fact is that a VN is worse! Unless you dump money into a VL along with engine mods it's gonna be a shocker.

The R33 on the other hand has excellent body integrity - you can see with that huge box section between the back seat and the boot firewall.

Handling as bad as it is stock, is something that even modern Commodores are not really comparable.

T.

Get it right Pete. With stock turbo running 3 bar boost mateeeeeeeeeeeee.

heheh Don't forget the stock injectors.

With regards to its regidity, I've had a VL in the past and it was stiffer than the VS I owned.

The pic I've attached.. What chassis rails. :)

The VL's are a nice car though, excellent for their time and long after.

Drop a FMIC a bit of boost in to them and they are up around the 180rwkw easily. They weigh in at around 1400kg's so very similiar to that of the R33 GTST.

post-382-1124765306.jpg

Edited by Cubes

Totally stock vs totally stock i'd give it to the 25GTS-T

Although neither are particularly fast in standard form.

Dont however under estimate the potential of the humble single cam RB30ET.

I got my old R31 to 340+rwHP a lot cheaper than I am atm with my RB26 ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...