Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure hwo useful this will be cause each car will support different amounts of timing depending on mods. When my car was tuned I think it ended up with 14deg of advance, anymore than that and it was pinging, this was at 14psi.

I think the only safe way to do it is have it dynoed, then they can change the timing while monitoring the pinging and do it safely.

See'ya:burnout:

I think alot of timing issues have alot to do with plug heat range too. I moved to 7s and it pings at 11psi (17deg) I 'll be moving back to 6s to get rid if the pinging.

Of course there are alot of other issues as well but this is one that not many people think about in relation to timiing.

Doc

At present I have probably about 30degrees advance or so. I tuned my timing 'on the road', boost set to 10psi (spikes to 12 every now and then).

Doctor: I agree with the plug thing, going to 6's is a hotter plug, less suited to high revs and boost than a 7 or 8. But, its the range I am using with a gap of 0.75mm.

If you can be bothered an '8' range plug just for the races is a good idea if you can be stuffed changing them before you go home (i can't).

30 degrees advance? shit that seems like alot.

I didn't realaise that plug heat range had so much affect, we just gapped mine real close, don't have any problems with misfires. We tuned mine for 14psi, therefore I think the timing has to go back to reduce the chance of detonation, the 2psi extra pumps alot more heat into the intake air and promotes pinging.

See'ya:burnout:

My car doensnt go anywhere near 25 degrees let alone 30??

Paul your wolf does your timing anyway so your base timing should always be 15 and you set your advance up thru the rpm ranges hey..

I think its better tuned on the road the dyno cant reproduce all senarios but is good as a start

Macka,

I'm just going by what Steve(SST) said, I have no idea what it is. The wolf totally controls the timing, we moved the CAS right back so it wouldn't affect anything then adjusted the timing from the computer. Still think 30 sounds high.

See'ya:burnout:

The basic rule of thumb with ignition is:

Base timing --- advanced, more if you run a lumpy cam or have poor cumbustion down low.

Top end timing --- Retards as load increases and combustion mixtures become leaner or more prone to detonate easily.

As if my car wanted to prove a point I got a little bit of pinging today, I suspect it was the last lot of fuel I put in was a tad dodgy.

30deg advance means that when the ecu decides to penalise you for too much air flow you have beat it to the punch. Thats the therory I have worked on and it seams to be right. However I am open to what others have to say.

The more advance you run the higher the potential power output, but it provides a narrow margin for error in tuning. The potential of pinging at high advancement is increased significantly, and therefore minor things like and increase in air temp or slightly dodgy fuel can lead to major problems.

I have mine tuned on the safe side, I'm after reliable power without the worry of detonation. When it was being tuned there was quite a bit more power to be had through advancement but it started to ping, so we backed the timing off a little.

See'ya:burnout:

You tend to find 'worked' cars run a larger amount of advance in the bottom rpm range and less advance in the top end. When I say less I mean less than a stockie motor, with more boost and and higher cylinder pressures there is less encouragement needed to start combustion at the right time for best power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...