Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No - when I spoke to Mark at Hills motorsport I definately said R33 quite a few times and he seemed convinced he has chipped quite a few..

Maybe they have found a way to chip it.. I guess its only a matter of time before everyone else finds out...

Edited by benl1981
  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think it's impossible to re-chip an R33 - there is no reason why it wouldn't work..

Thing is - you need the appropriate software + hardware.. you don't want to screw something and lean your car out while on a dyno.

i've looked into it a bit more - if you want to pull out your ecu - desolder it and put a zif slot in it'd help with the ease.

It isn't neccessarily hard.. i think it's more that you need to know what you are doing..

as long as you know what all the high and low throttle maps.. k value and about 20 other things mean.. than go for it..

i'd be interested to see how well you can tune back the A/F ratio.. one main advantage is that it's legal.. there is no way for you to get defected.. vs a power fc unfortunately isn't..

http://ashspecz.com/ashspec/zem/zem.htm is a commercial chioce..

tuning with a cable in your rom chip clot would be the best way - especially on a dyno.. you could run trace maps and work out what's doing what.. and easily adjust..

anyways.. that's my thoughts..

R33 maps are in the ecu itself, not on a seperate EEPROM, so you need to install a daughter-board. It's a fair bit of f**king about and no where near as flexible as a PowerFC which arent THAT expensive and nearly everyone knows how to use.

From memory Oosh, you were trying to get EEPROM writers and such to mod your own some while ago. Guessing you gave up? :P

Once you have a daughter board in there, and you goto a tuner, or DIY, you could then either do swap & test, like Toshi/Yoshi(?), or if you have an emulator like Dr Drift and such, dyno it, tune it, then burn.

If you can mod it yourself if you have some basic electronical experience or already have a modded R33 ECU seems cost effective.

I've got a modded R33 and loom, but an R32 head :) UGH!

Yeah, well my car hasn't been modified much further so there hasn't been the impetus, and when i looked at it properly you really need an emulator to do the job right.

IMHO it's just not a feasible process to:

Dyno -> Change Tune -> Erase Chip* -> Burn Chip --\
^                                                 |
|                                                 |
\------------ Repeat til done <-------------------/

*You really need a special eraser for this, you can leave em in the sun but it's unreliable, or you can keep using freshies at ~$10 a pop.

Which is why, from what i can gather, Sam originally had a generic tune and made the odd tweak here and there.

Once you factor in the equipment costs for an individual it's more economical to go the PowerFC route.

Edit: And you'll STILL need Dyno time, and someone to tune it (unless you're confident with it yourself) who will be unfamiliar with the process, which despite it's benefits is why it'll always be a bit of specialty to certain tuners.

Edited by Oosh

I think you'll find thats incorrect ...

Sure you can do the "burn & test" method, like Toshi.

That "special eraser" stuff is BS. An EEPROM writer costs about $35 to make from a Jaycar kit. EEPROM's are about $5, and are electronically eraseable, unlike EPROM's which need exposure to UV. You would only use EPROM's over EEPROM's if you were suffering some form of mental illness. Apparently it is also possible to use flash based media, however I am unsure how exactly. Possibly some interface between the EEPROM connectors.

When it comes to why the R33 E(E)PROM(?) can only be written once, I have no idea.

Best way is to use an emulator, which allows on-the-fly tuning, which for all intents and purposes is not going to be really any different to the PowerFC tuning. DrDrift and various others are using these emulators AFAIK.

Mark at Hills uses an emulator to tune it on the Dyno for you, then once it is OK he will burn it down to a chip. In the case of a 33 or 34 that requires a daughterboard on the ECU but he can sort that out for you.

Give him a call for prices, tell him Duncan for Raceworx sent you and he will look after you.

The standard ECU has some advantages over aftermarket ones, like keeping full knock sensor and consult port functionality. We use a retuned standard computer in the race car and it works well. And of course you get to keep factory tuning for cold start, air con, closed loop etc etc etc

Hey Ben re-retuning the standard computer is no different to retuning any other ECU. If you change something (eg turbos) you might or might not need to retune depending how different the new setup is.

Generally tuners charge for the time they spend on the dyno with your car, although some shops are arrogant enough to charge big flat fees for their alleged magical knowledge even if all they do is start with a old tune that a previous customer paid for :D

Hey Ben re-retuning the standard computer is no different to retuning any other ECU. If you change something (eg turbos) you might or might not need to retune depending how different the new setup is. 

Generally tuners charge for the time they spend on the dyno with your car, although some shops are arrogant enough to charge big flat fees for their alleged magical knowledge even if all they do is start with a old tune that a previous customer paid for :D

Yes, this is a less than wonderful trend in tuning. Witness the accounts of people getting $500 tunes which involve half an hour of tuning. Sure there should be some compensation for the fact the tuner/workshop is responsible for not killing your car... but even still.

Toshi - have you been able to reprogram the R33 ecu?

I've been told:

R33 uses a plcc style processor, and not an eprom. And there are also no header pins to install an aftermarket rom board

How are you able to change what is stored on the chip?

in order to tune R33 on dyno, board is needed, which approximately costs $350-$400 only board.

Tuner makes ECU map on dyno themselves and this data is transfered onto PLCC chip then fitted onto the customers ECU

Other wise use R32 ECU ( need change all map.not only fuel and ignition).

R33 chip is selling at http://www.grid.co.jp/en/prod/prod93.htm.

This is a one time chip.

when remapping ignition timing DIY, make E F colum same as D colum ignition timing. ( also remove speed and boost limitter)

This means about same AFC.

And adjust base ignition timing by crank angle sensor about 2-3 degrees.

There is no need for a fuel map change.

Because when fitting dump pipe and hi flow cat , cat back, air pod , boost 0.8-0.9 bar A/F changes to about 11. (depends on parts performance)

A/F 11 is not rich. HKS kansai drag racer GTR A/F11 for safe and power.

I think rechip is cheaper way ecu tune for std turbo R33 GTS-T.(my map is totally different std map).

If change turbo in the future I recomend power fc for R33.

I think R32 do not need power fc.

If some one having pomping or fuel rich problem please send me PM or [email protected].

I be able to chack problem by softwear then I will fix it. ( NSW only)

How much is it for a rechip..

What software do you use to do the modifications?

i'll probably shoot you an email at some stage for some further details. My car currently has A/F of about 10.5 when under full throttle.. I was under the impression that this was a bit rich.

Rechipping is R32 $250 R33 $350

Im using rom editor and grid data scan.(with map trace)

A/F meter is INNOVATR widband.

A/F 10.5 is only a bit rich. therefore is not a problem.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=81438&hl=

His car was fixed by my rechipped ecu.

Edited by Toshi

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
×
×
  • Create New...