Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have been eyeing off a 'unichip' for the 33t (air + exhaust done).

However, is there a reason why I could not put in an 'emanage' box instead (and possibly the other bits later on)? It would seem to be a considerably cheaper option... too good to be true? I am not after massive power or tunablity, just a bit more zing.

Why a 'chiptorque' over a 'unichip' over an 'emanage'? Anyone got info/ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8598-emanage-uni-chip-torque/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

nah thats fine... im not scared of it i just cant understand why more ppl dont use it.

the package im thinking of getting is $650 delivered from Japan

so did u get much of a gain ed?

you can use greddy's MAP sensor so once your AFM maxes out, the emanage takes over using the MAP sensor....not sure if unichip does that...

Also if you buy the e01 boost controller you can tune emanage via the e-01's screen and you can then data-log, save maps etc onto SD cards via the e-01.

I will be going this path :D

So there is no boost control function (even just a basic set and forget type) on the emanage box without going to the hand controller and screen?

+ 1 for the emanage on MAP and AFM

+ 1 for the unichip on the boost control

What about number of points for mapping? Both about the same?

ed,

I have heard some people grumbling about the emanage being a new product....not properly sorted yet......give em a couple of years...

You are obviously happy with yours, what could they change and upgrade anyway? Have you had any problems at all? What about installers and tuners, any blank looks when you fronted up (or was install and tune the same mob)?

I don't have a boost controller in my car, but then again, it's a stock turbo with full exhaust and stock cooler...

I'm peaking at JUST under 9psi...nothing to worry about there...

For the people who say give it a few years, they obviously don't know how much the japs test things before releasing on the market. There are a few things wrong with the emanage, but this is more of a document error, like the manual does not mention what the grey wire is....it's for TPS...

It was install and tune at the same place....although I AM thinking about going to a different place with my ignition harness install.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The water pump is know to leak as well. So if the coolant is low checking that first as well as hoses. 
    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
×
×
  • Create New...