Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maybe its just me, but are signature sizes out of control? I don't mind signatures when they are text or small images -- I also surf at 1600x1200 which helps make them less annoying -- but some of the ones appearing on SAU or just rediculously huge both in physical size and file size.

Not to pick on people, but this is a particularly bad example. Not only is it massive -- dwarfing his actual post and taking up half the screen -- but its 103kbytes too:

post-5796-1125625852.jpg

At 1024x768 it literally takes up the entire screen

post-5796-1125626086.jpg

When the same person posts multiple times in one thread you then end up with screens and screens of useless crap. Frankly it degrades the whole forum "experience" and utility.

Sooo.. how about a reasonable file size and dimensions limit for signatures?

Edit: Before someone jumps up and down and points out you can turn off signatures, that's not really the point frankly. I shouldn't have to turn them off just to get a reasonable browsing experience.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86243-signature-sizes/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'll freely admit mines a bit large, been meaning to resize it tell the truth, I don't mine OCAU's policy of banning pictures in sigs. They only slow things down.

Edit: Looks like admins agreed too, LOL, smaller sig now. :D

Edited by Oosh
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86243-signature-sizes/#findComment-1560160
Share on other sites

Use the feature disabling picture's on site's if you feel that bad about it :)

As per my first post, that's not the point. Nobody objects to small signatures, but when it entirely degrades the very point of the forum then somethings gone wrong IMHO.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86243-signature-sizes/#findComment-1563033
Share on other sites

yeah these big arse sigs are pretty stupid. esepcially that uras 34 one. i mean seriosuly wtf does that have to do with anything? it's not his car, it's just a random pic. woohoo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86243-signature-sizes/#findComment-1563653
Share on other sites

What is it with the product banners? Must be the same mentality as those that insist on having shopping lists on the side of their cars........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86243-signature-sizes/#findComment-1564524
Share on other sites

What is it with the product banners?  Must be the same mentality as those that insist on having shopping lists on the side of their cars........

Definately, should have the URAS pic OR the other two, personally i don't mind "shopping lists" if the car is packing that brands gear.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86243-signature-sizes/#findComment-1564537
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...