Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

THIS IS WHAT IT SAYS ABOUT IT:

just want 2 know if any 1 has had anything 2 do with them..??

NISMO RACING CHARGING STABILIZER

NEW Racing Charging System

Fits all vehicle (Nismo special design for Nissan vehicles)

Benefits:

** Increase Torque ** Increase Fuel Economy ** Car Response Up

** Stable Idling ** Quick Engine Start ** Lesser Engine Noise

** Optimize Electrical Equipment performance

EBay again?

It's not genuine Nismo btw.

You're much better off spending (less than) that on some thick gauge wire upgrading your car's earthing points. See this thead for an example: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=82677&hl=

That sounds like the HKS Circle Earth system. Autosalon did a review of the HKS one a while back and said for the money it wasn't worth it, and you'd be better off making one up yourself like raz0r$harP suggested. But it makes your engine bay look nice!

"Oh no it's the cops!"

"Worse, the police cops!"

That sounds like the HKS Circle Earth system. Autosalon did a review of the HKS one a while back and said for the money it wasn't worth it, and you'd be better off making one up yourself like raz0r$harP suggested. But it makes your engine bay look nice!

"Oh no it's the cops!"

"Worse, the police cops!"

Yah it is expensive !!!

But hey they are samples so I will try them out.

I have to admit that when I first put it on my car, it was idling much nicer. When I had the Metal Plus it did seem to get me more kms, then I tried the Torque one and kms per tank went down but my car does feel more torquey.

There are 3 other people trying various ones so we will see if we can come to a conclusion at the end.

Edited by beefy

Autosalon tested the HKS Circle Earth kit on 3 cars: a '94 Pulsar GTi, a series V RX7 and a Forrester XT. From memory they didn't notice any difference in the RX7, but in the Pulsar the owner said he thought it started easier on cold mornings, and his audio system sounded slightly better. In the Forrester, they did notice a gain of like 2kw's or so, but a slight drop in torque in the mid range. They also gave a step by step guide of how to make one yourself and what to buy, was very easy to make for fiddy bucks. They sound like a good idea in theory though, but I'd rather try to make my own for $50 than spend like $380 or so for a brand name one.

"Oh no it's the cops!"

"Worse, the police cops!"

well these 1's might be cheapees but for $70 they sound like they are worth a go 2 me..?? anyway i am after sound quality.. so it should help out there

The brand name ones are of questionable use: they probably make some difference of cars with poor earthing. The Pivot ones cost about $120.

Do you really think some Ebay knockoff with a fake brand name is going to be worth the hassle?

Ive had the Apexi one installed to help with Grounding and Idle issues in my car, they definitely help with the idle at the very least. Im not sure about all the other claims of more torque and better fuel economy. Seems like every mod in eBay says it improves fuel economy.

Is there specific point in the engine bay these wires are meant to go to?

Or is it just pick a metal spot on the engine and it'll be allright?

Ive been watching this topic for a while...

the actual power stabilisers have nothing to do with earthing, so in fact you are only comparing the quality of cables. Good quality cable from an electronics supplier will give you very similar earthing results. Another thing is that if the car already has a good earth, the kit will not provide a huge difference, but for older cars with poor earths it will be beneficial.

the powerstabiliser box smooths out votage fluctuations, which can help with starting and ICE. you may not even see an increase in votage tho.

in my opinion the PIVOT one is not worth it, they are relying on people to buy for the brand, I have done alot of research into these and have used similar systems on RC cars in the past.

I have built my own power stabiliser, for around $25 you can make a quite decent one that is compareable or the same as alot of commercial ones, the pivot one may be the best but imho it is not $75 better. I was planning on selling these but I did not want to supply a product that produced such a small performance gain, and testing on my car did not convincingly prove that it provided a noticable result

post-10983-1126324648.jpg

Edited by midnight

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...