Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

THIS IS WHAT IT SAYS ABOUT IT:

just want 2 know if any 1 has had anything 2 do with them..??

NISMO RACING CHARGING STABILIZER

NEW Racing Charging System

Fits all vehicle (Nismo special design for Nissan vehicles)

Benefits:

** Increase Torque ** Increase Fuel Economy ** Car Response Up

** Stable Idling ** Quick Engine Start ** Lesser Engine Noise

** Optimize Electrical Equipment performance

EBay again?

It's not genuine Nismo btw.

You're much better off spending (less than) that on some thick gauge wire upgrading your car's earthing points. See this thead for an example: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=82677&hl=

That sounds like the HKS Circle Earth system. Autosalon did a review of the HKS one a while back and said for the money it wasn't worth it, and you'd be better off making one up yourself like raz0r$harP suggested. But it makes your engine bay look nice!

"Oh no it's the cops!"

"Worse, the police cops!"

That sounds like the HKS Circle Earth system. Autosalon did a review of the HKS one a while back and said for the money it wasn't worth it, and you'd be better off making one up yourself like raz0r$harP suggested. But it makes your engine bay look nice!

"Oh no it's the cops!"

"Worse, the police cops!"

Yah it is expensive !!!

But hey they are samples so I will try them out.

I have to admit that when I first put it on my car, it was idling much nicer. When I had the Metal Plus it did seem to get me more kms, then I tried the Torque one and kms per tank went down but my car does feel more torquey.

There are 3 other people trying various ones so we will see if we can come to a conclusion at the end.

Edited by beefy

Autosalon tested the HKS Circle Earth kit on 3 cars: a '94 Pulsar GTi, a series V RX7 and a Forrester XT. From memory they didn't notice any difference in the RX7, but in the Pulsar the owner said he thought it started easier on cold mornings, and his audio system sounded slightly better. In the Forrester, they did notice a gain of like 2kw's or so, but a slight drop in torque in the mid range. They also gave a step by step guide of how to make one yourself and what to buy, was very easy to make for fiddy bucks. They sound like a good idea in theory though, but I'd rather try to make my own for $50 than spend like $380 or so for a brand name one.

"Oh no it's the cops!"

"Worse, the police cops!"

well these 1's might be cheapees but for $70 they sound like they are worth a go 2 me..?? anyway i am after sound quality.. so it should help out there

The brand name ones are of questionable use: they probably make some difference of cars with poor earthing. The Pivot ones cost about $120.

Do you really think some Ebay knockoff with a fake brand name is going to be worth the hassle?

Ive had the Apexi one installed to help with Grounding and Idle issues in my car, they definitely help with the idle at the very least. Im not sure about all the other claims of more torque and better fuel economy. Seems like every mod in eBay says it improves fuel economy.

Is there specific point in the engine bay these wires are meant to go to?

Or is it just pick a metal spot on the engine and it'll be allright?

Ive been watching this topic for a while...

the actual power stabilisers have nothing to do with earthing, so in fact you are only comparing the quality of cables. Good quality cable from an electronics supplier will give you very similar earthing results. Another thing is that if the car already has a good earth, the kit will not provide a huge difference, but for older cars with poor earths it will be beneficial.

the powerstabiliser box smooths out votage fluctuations, which can help with starting and ICE. you may not even see an increase in votage tho.

in my opinion the PIVOT one is not worth it, they are relying on people to buy for the brand, I have done alot of research into these and have used similar systems on RC cars in the past.

I have built my own power stabiliser, for around $25 you can make a quite decent one that is compareable or the same as alot of commercial ones, the pivot one may be the best but imho it is not $75 better. I was planning on selling these but I did not want to supply a product that produced such a small performance gain, and testing on my car did not convincingly prove that it provided a noticable result

post-10983-1126324648.jpg

Edited by midnight

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...