Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you are able to retain the factory airbox then consider it's going to require effort and money to make any pod setup just as good. You can also modify the factory airbox with an extra or better air feed to improve it at low cost too.

An airpod is really for when you have gotten stuck with turbo plumbing on big turbos that are larger or some other situation. It's just a part of a bigger bloody hassle that comes with bigger power setups.

Try a dyno with the bonnet 'down' and see how much power a pod loses over the factory airbox. You need a very good cold air induction box to get back only what you lose, hardly worth the effort. Every comparison of 'Wonder Pods' I've seen showing power increases was done with the bonnet 'up', rather pointless.

I have bought recently an R32 gtst with a pod and only a stainless partition in place, The partition does almost nothing (it gets very hot as does the pod inside). Suffice to say I am fixing the issue but, I'd rather not have to.

Some drag cars don't bother with any filters or airboxes at all because it isn't the power they are that concerned with losing so much as the abillity to get what power they have (more than they can use sometimes) through the drivetain (without breaking) and to the ground (controling the traction and transfer). They also strip the engine quite often so little extra bits of dust aren't worried about so much.

You gotta replace the turbo/AFM pipe if you wanna keep the airbox.

it has a very bad habit of being sucked closed, even more-so on GTRs :)

yeah found that out...the car will nearly stall...not good for the turbo either.

I will replace with a new AFM pipe but didn't have time so just wacked on my boxed CAI + Unifilter pod for the moment...1.3 bar is running nice with it :D

On the dyno it was happening at about 235rwkw mark. As for power loss...well if there is NO air...no pwr.

As for the topics of ARC boxes...for a GTST you can only have 1 intake mod in Vic...so choose between the the stock airbox and IC...we all know what needs upgrading first. 4 a GTR.. no dramas.

SO in summary...intake stock setup is good for about 230rwkw....need to replace both the filter and the AFM pipe - or wotever its called, the one to the turbo. Or for my setup it was good to 0.95 bar or roughly 235rwkw - on my setup.

Some ppl pms me about how I know...it was on the dyno..I saw it!

I have seen dyno results with the factory hose replaced with an aftermarket pipe and it actually made more power, apparently the ripples in the factory rubber hose can cause the air to be disturbed fairly dramatically.

So this means there IS a restriction with a stock box even if u replace the intake pipe ur only masking the issue. How much, dunno. But its obviously a restriction if it doesnt occur with a pod. However with the pod ur missing out on other things like colder air and pressure drop so prob. evens out in general.

So you can just knock another hole in the lid of the stock box to try and fix the restriction...But I actually took my lid off on the dyno and saw the pipe still suck in a bit.

So for me its:

1. New Intake pipe.

2. New Lid and snorkel to look stock.

3. No defect issues

I have seen dyno results with the factory hose replaced with an aftermarket pipe and it actually made more power, apparently the ripples in the factory rubber hose can cause the air to be disturbed fairly dramatically.

So this means there IS a restriction with a stock box even if u replace the intake pipe ur only masking the issue. How much, dunno. But its obviously a restriction if it doesnt occur with a pod. However with the pod ur missing out on other things like colder air and pressure drop so prob. evens out in general.

So you can just knock another hole in the lid of the stock box to try and fix the restriction...But I actually took my lid off on the dyno and saw the pipe still suck in a bit.

So for me its:

1. New Intake pipe.

2. New Lid and snorkel to look stock.

3. No defect issues

Its quite possible the intake pipe its self is contributing to the restriction, its quite lumpy in there and we all know air likes a smooth flat polished surface. Which is why exhaust ports are polished. Improve flow due to reduced turbulence.

Either way I think the best option is to replace the intake pipe. The turbo is doing the work sucking the air so there's no direct pumping losses as an N/A would experience with a slight restriction in the inlet tract.

So yes Mask the problem as you call it. >_< Its not necessarily loosing power anyway. Just keeping those defects away.

As said above. If the car were N/A its a complete different story.

N/A = ditch the afm, remove 'any' possible restriction there is as it all contributes to pumping losses.

Its quite possible the intake pipe its self is contributing to the restriction, its quite lumpy in there and we all know air likes a smooth flat polished surface. Which is why exhaust ports are polished. Improve flow due to reduced turbulence.

Either way I think the best option is to replace the intake pipe. The turbo is doing the work sucking the air so there's no direct pumping losses as an N/A would experience with a slight restriction in the inlet tract.

So yes Mask the problem as you call it. >_< Its not necessarily loosing power anyway. Just keeping those defects away.

As said above. If the car were N/A its a complete different story.

N/A = ditch the afm, remove 'any' possible restriction there is as it all contributes to pumping losses.

Dont disagree. But during the test I replaced the stock box with a pod and issue does not occur at all. So therefore my point was the pipe is not the main cause of restriction as it remains constant in the test, however crap it might be .

If ur gonna go to the trouble of replacing the intake...I might as well do it properly and remove all the restriction buy venting the box lid better.

As for NAs...I have made about 3 setups for my NA fto. The stock box with new intake pipe got me about 4rwkw of stock...cos the stock one was so bad, the pod gave nothing...infact my testing showed slight worse results with the pod.

I think the primary problem is the size of the inlet on the stock GTSt airbox, not the actual filter area else GTR's would have trouble with more power.

The ribbed pipe is secondary but can be a major issue when sucking closed at higher power and on hot days so clearly that has to go.

The solution? For me it is a black painted FMIC, opened airbox with Apexi filter (oiled are illegal, see attached docupic from Pauls website so K&N are out) and a replacement hard pipe also black. Leave the heat for the ricers with pods and shiny "look at me, I'm an attention whore" FMIC.

Vicroads-EPA-Guide.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
×
×
  • Create New...