Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Another view on the MAF v MAP debate, from Ben Strader - one of the better Autronic tuners in the U.S. and founder of www.efi101.com

Regards

Andrew

==============================

The Autronic unit differs slightly in the way it calculates fuel and ignition from the stock unit and most other aftermarket systems in that it uses "speed/density" to calibrate with.

Basically it uses a "map sensor" to indicate the pressure inside the manifold {negative or positive} and then references that value against the engine speed.

Then, using a complex mathematical sequence based on the

PV=NrT theory it calculates the actual amount of air in the engine for one cycle.........multiplies that time RPM {number of cycles} and then looks that value up in a "Base Fuel Table" which the user can modify to add or subtract fuel to obtain a desired A/F ratio.

The factory and some aftermarket systems use a MASS FLOW system which directly measures the air entering the engine {corrected for temperature} and then uses the same style of tables to look up user entered values. This sytems works well, but does have some drawbacks.

First, beacuse all of the air going into the engine must be actually measured, it must pass through a calibrated orifice called the Mass Air Flow Sensor. This sensor poses a restriction to airflow and can be a horsepower robber at elevated power levels.

Second, any air leaks after the sensor, but before the throttle body will cause a lean condition because there is no means of measuring that "sneaky" air.

The Speed/Density method only cares about the air inside the manifold at any given time and is therefore a bit more flexible.

Plus, you can eliminate the stock mass air meter to gain additional power, or leave it in place to maintain the stock appearance.

Plus the Autronic comes with the Auto-tune option and Anti-Lag functions plus unlimited options for data logging as STANDARD options........all inculded in the price.

Again I think the UTEC is a great system and I have NO complaints about it. The Autronic is just another good option for everyone.

======================

Hi Andrew, what Ben says is absolutely correct. But think about what he actually says........."it uses a "map sensor" to indicate the pressure inside the manifold". We are talking about turbo charged cars here with wastegates and boost controllers that very accurately control "the pressure inside the manifold". I don't know about your engine and boost controller, but mine has the same boost level from 4,000 rpm to 7,500 rpm. So the MAP sensor is basically useless, it means the formula has a constant "P" and that is one of the vital inputs in the Ideal Gas Law formula.

Next think about..........."the air..... must pass through a calibrated orifice called the Mass Air Flow Sensor. This sensor poses a restriction to airflow"......this only applies if you have chosen an AFM that is too small for your power level target. I don't see how that is any different to me saying MAP sensor based ECU are no good because I choose to have too small an air filter. It is irrelevant in choosing an ECU.

Lastly ....... "any air leaks after the sensor, but before the throttle body will cause a lean condition because there is no means of measuring that "sneaky" air". Obviously Ben wrote this for N/A engines not turbo charged engines, as any air leaks after the turbo would cause a rich condition.

:( cheers ;)

Edited by Sydneykid
  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yep, all very true on both sides.

I guess my questions is: Why do 90% of the race engines I see use a MAP based system rather than MAF?

I think ARC rally cars are the only race engines I've seen that use MAF and that's only because of the production based regs.

Some good discussion starting to happen here.

Regards

Andrew

Excellent gentlemen, more discussion please as this is all good stuff.

Yep, all very true on both sides.

I guess my questions is: Why do 90% of the race engines I see use a MAP based system rather than MAF?

I think ARC rally cars are the only race engines I've seen that use MAF and that's only because of the production based regs.

Some good discussion starting to happen here.

Regards

Andrew

Yep, all very true on both sides.

I guess my questions is: Why do 90% of the race engines I see use a MAP based system rather than MAF?

I think ARC rally cars are the only race engines I've seen that use MAF and that's only because of the production based regs.

Some good discussion starting to happen here.

Regards

Andrew

Hi Andrew, we use MAP based ECU's on N/A race engines (eg; V8SuperCars) otherwise I would have to run 8 X AFM's. On the SuperTourers I would have to run 4 X AFM's, one for each throttle body. Every little tiny bit of restriction is avoided at all costs, so we have gigantic air inlets with huge filters.

On a turbo charged engine there is one air inlet (for each turbo) so it is not so much of an issue. Plus tiny restrictions on the inlet to the compressor mean nothing, the turbo has more than enough airflow to make the power target within its efficiency island.

On a 100% race engine I really don't give a rats about cold start and run, hot start, air con / power steer / electrical load compensation etc. All the stuff that makes an AFM driven ecu superior on a road car is pretty much irrelevant on a race car.

Plus AFM voltage ramp tables are hard to program from scratch with altitude / humidity / temperature compensation. This is not a problem when using a Power FC, Apexi have done it all for us.

This is not a simple, one is ALWAYS better than the other. Horses for courses as they say.

:D cheers :)

  • 2 weeks later...
What HP ATTW < what performance and times?

I am anticipating with my build + or -  800 .

My reading i got last dyno run was 247hp. i was using a Pod filter at the time and the bracket did not sit on properly.i have changed it back to my panel now though so power might be a little higher..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...