Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: Alpine MRV-1507 amplifier

Location: Nowra

Item Condition: BRAND NEW

Price: $650

Contact Details: PH 0421582221

I have for sale a brand new ALPINE MRV-1507 Amp.

I live in Nowra on the south coast. Note. these amps retail for $730 US dollars

Amp has to go.

Ph: 0421582221

$650

This amp was bought to drive four 12" subs in a car i had. Crafted a custom fiberglass enclousure in the boot. Crashed the car before I fitted the amp.

I have since gorn away from car audio. The amp is brand new and has never been used. I use to work as a custom car audio installer and bought the amp after my boss won the SQ PRO class at summernats twice with one of these amps.

Read the specs and a review as attached below:

AlpineMRV_1507p.jpg

Alpine MRV-1507

With a stylized design and solid performance, Alpine’s latest class AB amp offers big power.

Alpine MRV-1507 Specs

Price & Contact: $730 USA; 310-326-8000

All measurements @ 14 volts unless otherwise specified.

Frequency Response (4 Ohm IHF Load 20Hz to 20 kHz, 1 kHz Ref.): +0 dB, -0.2 dB

L/R channel error, max deviation 20 Hz to 20 kHz: 0.2 dB

Phase Response (4-ohm IHF Load 20Hz to 20kHz 1kHz Ref.): +6.5 degrees, -12.3 degrees

Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Below Rated Output, “A” weighted): -118.2 dB

Distortion at Rated Output @ 1 kHz: 0.25% @ 900 watts

Output Power(resistive) minimum output 20 Hz to 20 kHz @ 1%THD+N (all channels driven into 4 ohms): 274 watts x 2 @ 14 volts; 225 watts x 2 @ 12.8 volts; 140 watts x 2 @ 10.5 volts

Output Power (resistive) minimum output 20 Hz to 20 kHz @ 1%THD+N (all channels driven into 2 ohms): 455 watts x 2 @ 14 volts 371 watts x 2 @ 12.8 volts; 227 watts x 2 @ 10.5 volts

Output Power (4-ohm IHF Reactive Load @ 60 Hz to 1% THD+N): 995 watts

Crosstalk (Referenced to Rated Output, 20 Hz to 20 kHz): -52 dB

Damping Factor @ 100 Hz, 2 ohms: 348

Voltage for Rated Output: 215mV to 4.5 volts

Idle Current Draw: 1.5 amps

Current Draw @ 1/3 Maximum Power: 63.5 amps @ 316 watts

Efficiency @ 1/3 Maximum Power: 36%

Power-Up Noise: -3.7 dB SPL

Power-Down Noise: 22 dB SPL

by Brian Smith

The MRV-1507 is a two-channel amplifier with power ratings of 225 watts x 2 or 900 watts x 1 into 1-ohm loads and 450 watts x 2 into 2-ohm loads. Features include an internal crossover and subsonic filter, line level outputs, fan-forced cooling, and a low frequency EQ with full parametric operation.

Performance

I’ll give it to you straight — You’d be hard pressed to find one that performs better overall than the MRV-1507. I’ve seen a whole lot of class A/B’s in this power range over the past few years and have come to dread them. They’re usually the biggest of pains to deal with and are often frighteningly unstable. Anything that draws 140 amps and hums like a high voltage transformer is bound to cause some apprehension. There are times when one feels led to probe the limits carefully, lest the magic smoke should appear.

By comparison, the MRV-1507 ran with no more fuss than a good amp half it’s size. Of course, it has a much larger appetite than a 100-watt x 2 unit, but it’s very well behaved and produces impressive performance specs. Signal-to-noise of 118 dB and 36 percent efficiency at 1/3 power are pretty rare numbers, especially in a kilowatt amp.

Connections & Adjustments

The MVR-1507’s chassis is laid out with power connections on one end and input/output connections and configuration switches at the other. All of the units variable controls are located on top of the heat sink with a protective cover. Connections to the amp include RCA inputs, RCA line level outputs, and 1/2-inch spade receptacles for all power and speaker connections. The amp has an extra B+ connection, which can be used to bypass the internal fuse and line choke. Switched adjustments include input mode, phase invert, crossover enable, and parametric EQ enable. Variable adjustments include input sensitivity, high pass cutoff frequency (30 Hz to 200 Hz), low pass cutoff frequency (30 Hz to 200Hz), and the parametric EQ controls, which include center frequency (30 Hz to 200 Hz), Q factor (1 to 10) and boost/cut (+/-12 dB), and a fixed subsonic filter.

Installation

A parametric bass EQ? Hello, now you’ve really got my attention. Simple bass boost is one of the most useless features in car audio. It wasn’t designed to fix problems; rather, the idea was to give the customer more of what they already had (bass). If you don’t know any better, or are primarily concerned with being obnoxiously loud, that might sound like a good idea. However, if you’re looking for SQ and do know better, then an arrangement such as the one found here will be much more likely to satisfy. The ability to cut rather than boost is particularly helpful. You can actually smooth a lump in response with a little bit of cut, but all the boost in the world will never correct a destructive resonance. Try removing what you don’t want rather than boosting what you do — it really works. (Alpine reports that this is part of the company’s BassEngine system concept — it allows users to maximize the sound quality and impact of bass reproduction in any vehicle.)

At about 2.4 x 10.3 x 21 inches, and about 19 pounds, the MRV-1507 definitely won’t fall into the small amp category. However, it appears to have a decent heat sink design in addition to fan-forced cooling. All controls are either recessed or otherwise protected and, well, it’s just a good looking amp. The subdued matte gray and brushed aluminum finish indicates that there are a few companies in mobile audio that have retained some measure of class. There’s more than enough room on the top of the MRV-1507 for one of those 1500-watt MAX POWER blurbs, but Alpine didn’t go that route. I guess tacky amps aren’t in their repertoire.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
    • Very interesting, im not sure how all those complications fit in to running a haltech instead of a stock ecu but I'm starting to think I'm a bit out of my league.
    • I just put 2 and 2 together. This is a Neo converted R32. The Neo ECU (in concert with the R34's AC controller) runs the AC quite differently to how the R32 ECU and AC controller do it. If you just drop it all in, it won't work. There is some tricky wiring required, including changing to the pressure switch that the Neo controllers want to see. I don't know what it is, because mine was done by a guru. It was a year or so after I did that transplant before he worked out what needed to be done.
×
×
  • Create New...