Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

Heres my Dyno Sheet what do you all think??

Just wondering on how to read the air feul ratio on this graph.

Does it start at 11.5 or at 12.5.

Also what would you consider running lean or running rich.

Neways thoughts would be helpfull.

The car is a R32 GTSt wit Bolts ons running 12psi

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

Ummm:

3" Zorst

Pod

Splitfire coil packs

Slightly bigger turbo unsure of what kind maybe VG30?? hasnt been looked at yet 2 many pipes.

Any idea on whats rich and whats lean

For example is 11:1 Rich or lean???

Is it the higher the first number the richer?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1579922
Share on other sites

A:F ratio = Air:Fuel

11:1 = 11 parts air : 1 part fuel.

11.5:1 is a safe setting.

when your car runs lean, it has HIGHER parts of AIR per part of FUEL.

so if you see things like 12.5:1 or higher, then you could end up in trouble.

I wouldn't like to see anything leaner than 12:1

that's why I said 11.5:1 that you currently have is a good safe reliable setting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1580273
Share on other sites

you're better off taking it that high while on the dyno so that the tuner can make sure that there is enough fuel capacity till the rev limiter.

cause if you miss shift or something while racing say, then you might hit the limiter and maybe not have the tuning there and cause some major damage..

at least on a dyno, he can see it getting there and back off if required.

so it IS worth it.

and it seems that your dyno run was done in 3rd gear right?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1594397
Share on other sites

Hmm theres a fair few opinions on whats a good afr. I'd like mine to be 11.8:1 or 12:1, nothing leaner than that. Just incase of a boost spike or something unnatural happening.

I thought dyno runs were best done in 4th gear due to there almost 1:1 gear ratio?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1595600
Share on other sites

I've said it many times. :D

Ceramic turbine wheels absolutely hate high exhaust gas temperatures.

Leaner AFR = higher exhaust gas temp.

Less ignition timing = higher exhaust gas temp.

Slightly richer = lower exhaust gas temp.

As its slightly richer you can dial in a little more ignition timing.

More ignition timing = lower exhaust gas temp.

Slightly richer, around ~11.5:1 + more ignition timing = the same power but a safer same power due to a lower exhaust gas temp.

Notice how a lot of the 300rwkw+ RB's at points in the rev range run a 11:1. Its all about reliability, bugger running it leaner when it may cost you 4k if not more for a motor rebuild.

12.5 is definitely a little lean. What happens when that fuel filter becomes a little blocked? 13:1, especially if its on stock injectors up around 200rwkw.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1595885
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
    • You reckon? I have to disagree. Notwithstanding that at some point we may all be forced to do this to our cars if we want to keep driving them, there is absolutely nothing about an electric-converted-previously-IC-car that is ever good. EVs that are built by OEMs on platforms that were originally IC already suck, let alone the shitty outcomes that result from doing it as a retro to something that was actually built as an IC car. This is because the platform really needs to be designed to house the battery in a useful place (ie, down as low as possible) and the motors are properly located relative to the wheels that they have to drive. Converted platforms already suck at this. But when you try to shove sufficient battery capacity into a previously IC car, you can't put it down on/in the floor, because that space doesn't exist. You can't find enough space where the fuel tank used to be (if it is an inboard fuel tank) and you don't want to hang it out behind the rear axle line if you had a rear fuel tank. And there's not enough space in the tunnel if you still want to use it for anything remotely like what it was originally used for. The engine bay is too big for a motor, and you'd really prefer that the motor for the rear wheels wasn't in the front engine bay anyway. And there's not enough room where the diff was for a proper man-sized E motor. And then.... there is the complete lack of soul and emotion that is provided by EVs. There are some cracking restomods out there. Like the Alfaholics GTA thingo. But it is petrol powered. Look at the alternative EV version of a GTA restomod by Totem. it is jaw droppingly beautiful. But by all reports is is objectively awful to drive, despite having 600 HP or something, simply because there is nothing there. It sounds like a sewing machine or a leaf blower. It should scream and wail and make the hairs on your neck stand up. Oh, and it's 1500 bloody kg in a car that was <900kg when new. GTRs are heavy enough as it is without pushing them up to 2tonnes worth of pork.
    • https://www.dezeen.com/2025/01/06/nissan-electric-r32-skyline-gt-r-godzilla-sports-car/   I reckon this is pretty cool. Lots of other Resto mods have turned to ev power.
    • hahaha @joshuaho96 the most action it gets is when I have to drive from West to SE VIC to meet the fam. Even then, it;s on highway cruising speeds
    • don't know anyone in this thread, but i just found it, read the entire thing in a few hours, realized greg is still posting progress, and just have to say, this is awesome. it looks awesome. 100% right about the Uras kit making it a pain to get on hoists...have the same kit on my 34 and it takes six 2x4s and race ramps to do it without taking parts off. this reminds me exactly of this thread. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/r63-amg-the-unicorn-of-my-destruction/110824/page8/
×
×
  • Create New...