Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe u made 218rwkw. :O

I need a dyno run printout to be able to dial in all the numbers so the graph looks right as no doubt you have picked up mid range as well.

Sky30,

Bl4ck32 was running 1bar, I was running stock rb20det actuator, i.e no boost control, boost would spike up to 12psi at ~2000rpm then tail off to 9psi by 4000rpm where it would go on to make peak power.

60km/h is approx 2200rpm. Its strange as if that is the case then 160km/h is only ~5900rpm. <scratches head>

I am going to need every ones tyre sizes to apply a correction.

Not to forget the diff ratio correction for both Natho's and the R33's slightly higher 4.11:1.

As I said prior, if your keen to compare off boost ignition maps i'm keen to do so. Depending how much works gone in to your maps you may pick a little off boost torque up. :D

Edited by Cubes
  • Replies 294
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Running 235/40/18's would act as if you had an ever so slightly higher diff ratio, so your top speed vs rpm will be higher than the others, as a result also your down low power will be down.

A good example of this is Natho's VLT, that runs a 3.45:1 diff ratio and the dyno stopped at 5100rpm yet his wheel speed is up there.

I think its wrong to compare bl4ck32 and my dyno's on the chart I posted prior. Something is just wrong with the speed vs rpm, possibly shaun fiddled with the wheel speed calibration. Don't know. :O

Edited by Cubes

Joel, can you add mine to that graph too, just for comparison sake, or post the xls file and I'll do it myself!

Also, I presume you're doing the calcs for the diff ratios to do a torque comparison at some stage. Should be interesting to say the least.

I also think the wheel speed on these dyno graphs aren't correct (I think Shaun mentioned that), as redline on my car in 3rd gear should be nearer to 200km/h than the 176 the run stopped at.

EDIT: Also, are those graphs all from the same day, or are there others there?

Edited by chops

The only dyno runs that were not done on the day were Bl4ck32's and mine.

I mainly put them in there for a comparison to Sky30's, how much of a difference the small stocker turbo's make to a 3ltr running a GT35R .82.

The wheel speed is always incorrect.. But what I do think has been modified since Bl4ck32 and I ran on the dyno is the wheel speed/roller calibration.

As I know 100% at 2000rpm mine was making 100rwkw.

Can you post up or pm me the first dyno run? I'm keen to see how the power curve looks. I had mine ran in v8 mode on D&T's dyno, the power curve resembled the lump style power curve of your second run.

Edited by Cubes

No time at the moment for wheel speed calcs.

Shouldn't be too far off as its only a 3.9:1 ratio, unlike Natho's 3.45:1, his run finished at 5100rpm.

Definitely looks strange how the run starts at 100km/h. What RPM was your run started at?

But it should be all road/roller speed related, every one drop their car in 4th and accelerate away.

post-382-1130395892.gif

Edited by Cubes

No idea what rpm it was started at.

That's a bit of a problem with autos though, if you give it full throttle at any lower speed it would drop back a gear, which is why I guess it starts so high up in rpm. Tuners with the software have the luxury of being able to lock the trans in 3rd gear.

First run was done in a different V8 mode though, not Shoot_6, so I don't think it will give the comparison you're after. I only have the hard copy, if you really want it I'll scan it and drop it to you.

If you want to do wheel speed things at a later date, redline on mine should be 6200 rpm, so you can work back from there. (approx 35.2 rpm per indicated kph, which would suggest approx 3500rpm starting point)

Hey dudes, we should get all our turbo's highflowed at once and get a cheap price because we are doing 3-4.

something i definately want to do, but unfortionately cant afford at the moment :)

The RB30 is nice but it also requires a nice manifold and decent sized turbo to prevent the top end nosing over.

It is nice though... I'm able to accelerate off the lights from idle and have it accelerate as hard from idle as a stockish (exhaust) LS1 Manual. Unsure if the edited ones have any more balls off idle or not.

So its definitely got some torque.

Wheelspin is a big issue for me at the moment, I put it down to worn subframe bushes causing axle tramp and a half stuffed diff that doesn't completely lock up, probably also causing part of the axle tramp.

God help it once its nudging 280. :D

Sky30's definitely sounds awesome on the dyno, I wouldn't mind grabbing either an audio file or small vid clip off some one at some time. :rolleyes:

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...