Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have finally reached the decision i am going to run the GT3076 looking for around 500HP but i am wanting to use the factory rb25det turbine section to keep things simple as far as exhaust wastegate and manifold as i cant find any info on a resonably priced tubular manifold here in the states. does anyone know if the rb35 turbine can be machined to fit the 3076. thanks alot

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87856-turbine-machining/
Share on other sites

i have finally reached the decision i am going to run the GT3076 looking for around 500HP but i am wanting to use the factory rb25det turbine section to keep things simple as far as exhaust wastegate and manifold as i cant find any info on a resonably priced tubular manifold here in the states. does anyone know if the rb35 turbine can be machined to fit the 3076. thanks alot

The RB25 housing being a garrett unit will most likely fit ok. I'm going to try the same with my ITS turbo.

As for decent manifolds go to http://www.ssautochrome.com

they have nice stuff fairly cheap.

Cheers mate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...