Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hang on a minute.....he (Nismoid) has come into this thread and made a smart-arse comment. Paul has explained fully what the situation was, even offering the dyno operators number (not our tuner) if he needed it clarified.......THEN he has come again with another smart-arse comment (world leader crap) So Paul has returned serve....and good on him, are we supposed to sit here and cop it. He doen't need to put up with that crap. Here's a copy of the result and the dyno operators number if anybody wishes to call him for further questions. We are just about over this whole SAU thing.

Someone had to take over from the SST brigade, didn't they ?

You are getting offended by your own words. World leader has your trade mark on it. So, can anyone get a world leading build and performance...? Perth was too far to drive but Sydney is much reachable.

Please do not leave SAU.

well my AFR is flat on both Jim's dynos.... and the dyno at the GONG...

maybe it is just a sensor thing, I would hardly imagine the car is actually tuned like that AFR, as it is not consistant with the other information... i.e. the smooth power curve or the other dyno sheets I have seen....

12-12.5 still seems ok to me :rolleyes:

oh and don't stress Stace :rolleyes:

two.06L - let's settle a few things here once and for all... I think I speak on behalf of many people when I say that the 466rwkw power figure seems a little high for turbos that are rated at 640hp, yet your car is claiming to be pushing 624 hp AT THE WHEELS... And apparently you haven't even turned the boost up!!!! Can you find any logic in what I'm saying??

I'll ask you a simple question, do you think there is a difference in dyno figures when conducting a power run in 'shootout' mode and 'non-shotout mode'??? I have done a comparison with my car (see here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...opic=78364&hl=) and have noticed an increase of around 10%.. So that's why I'm asking if you have a dyno graph in 'non shootout' mode, to make the figure more believable.... My car has 365rwkws, but 396rwkws in shootout mode, does that mean I should preach to the world my car is a 400rwkw monster???

Just have a good think about it...

For anyone thats interested the two Dash 7 GT28R's come up almost line ball with the GT3540R in 1.06 ARR turbine housing form for compressor and turbine flow . The GT28R's (2860R's) have a little more turbine efficiency (75 vs 72%) and flow a little less at lower exhaust gas pressure ratios .

I think HKS GT-SS's use a slightly different comp wheel and the maps would be interesting to compare .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Non-shootout mode can be configurated by the dyno owner/operater, so it would be rare to get a conservative figure in that mode. I don't think Ben @ Racepace has any sort of ego regarding impressing customers with large numbers, and so has his kit set more realistic.

2530's use a T3 comp wheel that peaks @ 35lbs/min, theoretically twins are worth 70lbs/min or similar to a T04R/Z - T66 turbo flow wise.

p.s. my dad can still beat up my mum.

TommyK: Have all your goodies been installed and a final tune performed? If so, do you have a dyno sheet you wouldn't mind posting up? IIRC some of your modifications are very similar so it would make an interesting point of comparison.

dont know bout these 'so called' european performance cars...

FIAT stands for:

Fix

It

Again

Toniii

I never thought my European car was a "performance" car :)

BMW: Brings More Women :O:P

You know, the money-grubbing, self-absorbed and ego-centric kind :D

TommyK:  Have all your goodies been installed and a final tune performed?  If so, do you have a dyno sheet you wouldn't mind posting up?  IIRC some of your modifications are very similar so it would make an interesting point of comparison.

Lucien - I do believe I posted one up a while ago. Check for posts by me in the NSW section.

Mind you - I am not happy with my CRD tune. The car is laggier than i would have expected with these turbos. I am going in to BEL tomorrow to get a road tune done. Full boost @ 4800 rpm in 4th is comparable to Mik's tune, and he's running GT-RS turbos :D. Not happy!

Will let you know results tomorrow (hopefully)

Lucien - I do believe I posted one up a while ago. Check for posts by me in the NSW section.

Mind you - I am not happy with my CRD tune. The car is laggier than i would have expected with these turbos. I am going in to BEL tomorrow to get a road tune done. Full boost @ 4800 rpm in 4th is comparable to Mik's tune, and he's running GT-RS turbos :P. Not happy!

Will let you know results tomorrow (hopefully)

Sorry, what I meant was: I remember you saying that the cam timing needed to be played with (and, IIRC, there was also some issue with your boost controller). Hence I was wondering if those issues had been corrected and a dyno done.

Seems like all will be answered soon anyway :O

Tommy k,

This is the 1st negative feedback i've heard from crd's tuning...you need to remember that the gtrs turbo application is top end power. gtss is better for mid range.

Just so you know - I have the same turbo setup on my r32 along with the typical mods i.e. pfc, cams etc.

I can honestly say that crd are the most reputable gtr tuners in nsw & possibly aust - my results were amazing :O

Marko.

Lucien - I do believe I posted one up a while ago. Check for posts by me in the NSW section.

Mind you - I am not happy with my CRD tune. The car is laggier than i would have expected with these turbos. I am going in to BEL tomorrow to get a road tune done. Full boost @ 4800 rpm in 4th is comparable to Mik's tune, and he's running GT-RS turbos :P. Not happy!

Will let you know results tomorrow (hopefully)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks Duncan! Yeah it's street use for me only. Maybe occasional track day. Any difference in noise when running with the two pumps? I would expect the lift pump to be more quiet than the main pump so hopefully not? And yes, unfortunately quite a big price difference to the simple hanger setup. Though I'm usually willing to trade money for better reliability and future-proofing. Buy once, cry once and all that. I'd be very happy to never have to deal with fuel pump / wiring issues again  
    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
×
×
  • Create New...