Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

mmmmmmmm

mackas car had a horrid two days then?

man i feel sorry for the guy

oh well she'll be right

porn movies hey?

i think there looking for guys to star in some beastiality porns?

you interested? too late i already put your name down for the scene where you have to bust a lady monkey open and at the same time let a eel slither all over you!

good

i knew you would love it! :D

adrian :P

ahaaha dammmit

after i posted that i realised

i just put myself out as a "don't leave home, postwhore, who has a explicit and wierd imagination"

oh well

it's all good

so u did go to the audition?

and it went great?

awesome is it an electric eel?

always wanted to see one of them?

just makes sure i don't touch it ewww it has paul germs!

hehehe

adrian :D

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Adrian,  

I only want to star in Porn movies, so far I haven't had any auditions:lol:

Tuning Macka's car was a bit of a nightmare, lots of minor issues making life tough.

See'ya:burnout:

The only thing that was tough for you was when i handed u the timing light :D :lol:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...