Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by darK

cya joe..

ken, cant i go under my mums name? shes a rating 1

Don't know , check with your mums insurance company.

Anyone under 25 over here gets bent over by the companies.

Cheers

over 25

Ken

Originally posted by gtrken

Don't know , check with your mums insurance company.

Anyone under 25 over here gets bent over by the companies.

Cheers

over 25

Ken

will i have any chance of importing a late model chaser? not an old one.. but at least 93 and after

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

It is possible, 3 entries last year did it, but we'll see what we get given, then make decisions:D

Joe, Night mate, are you coming tommorow?

See'ya:burnout:

OK , so who has stuck there hand up.

I assume you and me and who else.

GTRNIK ?

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by darK

will i have any chance of importing a late model chaser? not an old one.. but at least 93 and after

If someone is doing Compliance , yes you can import one.

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

We have lots of interest:D

Me, You, Killer-T, GT NIK, Caminperth, Zanda, Adrian, R33 Impul, NO RSPECT, Judged, plus  a few others.

So depending on how many spots we get we may or may not need to limit numbers.

See'ya:burnout:

Apart from mine , aren't they all 33's ?

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by darK

ken..

this was written after the specs of the Chaser Mk V (97 model)

Dark , modified ones are out atm.

If a compliance ( read RAWS w/shop ) applies and does all the paperwork for a 93 or so chaser then I would saay you will.

Trouble is that is going to cost around $20+K to do it.

You have to work out if there is enough profit to warrant doing it ( ie are they going to sell enough to get there money back ).

This is why 92-94 GTR's may be defunct cos atm , no one is bothering to comply them

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

Yes, that's why I'm trying to get people like EVL R33 and the black R34 GTR interested.

Although NIK's doesn't look like a GTS-t:D

See'ya:burnout:

NIKS doesn't even look like a GTR .

It is WAAAAY wilder than that:D :alien:

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by darK

hey.. u know how P Platers have a 125kw/per tonne limit..

mitsubishi fto

6A12 G MIVEC Engine – 168kw/tonne

6A12 G DOHC – 145kw/tonne

Not in Good Ole WA

Cheers

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...