Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, I am over 25 thankfully...but still Shannon's quote is higher than Just Car. Which one is recommended though in term of trustworthyness?

Btw, just finished talking to both Just Car and Shannons. They seem to be unaware that the VIper/Clifford is not of Australian Standard. LOL

And the code for Australian Standard is:

AS/NZ4601

I guess at the end of the day the question is, will they make it a big deal if so happens that you car has Viper and got stolen?

shannons told us we need to fax through a receipt for the alarm

*paying about 2.3k for a 23yr old rating 1 for a 32 (practically no diff in $ with gtr/gtst).

i think they both said they wont insure a remote start alarm either (but not 100% sure on that). I think they wanted a 3point immobiliser from memory.

Main difference between shannons and just cars (imo) is shannons = lifetime guarantee on repairs, choice of repairer .. just cars = 3yr guarantee, must match or beat quote from one of their approved repairers if you want to fix elsewhere (bit of a F around).

I think Shannons is better.. even their home insurance covers specialist tools in a garage.. but their quotes are double Just Cars (but we are both under 25).

blackskyline: what about if you swap the viper wiring harness to a black one? Surely that would make the alarm acceptable? (was thinking about upgrading to viper.. maybe not!)

Was thinking of changing the cables to black. But that doesn't make the viper an australian standard.

I've talked to few of my friend who owns a audio security shop and they mentioned that the australian standard alarm like flashpoint, mongoose, etc are not even half as good as the Viper or Clifford in terms of module and functionality. They are only better in terms of the black cabling. That means, you car *MIGHT* be safe from stolen but not necessarily safe from breakins. I find that is is plain silly that the insurance company accepts crappy alarms but rejects the top of the range ones.

It is sad, I'm gonna have to switch to a crappy alarm product (or even just put in a plain OZ standard immobilizer). Or alternatively, change my comprehensive to third party and put a top of the range alarm.

Its not as simple as changing the wire :)

wont change the model number of the alarm!

My good mate does alarms. He can get something to work for you if you want? PM for details. He comes reccommended by many :)

They can be safe if you do them right. I mean 3 (or 2) points of immobilisation is just that. It doenst matter if you spend $300 or $700

You just get funky stuff like shock sensors which wont save your insurance bill. Or make the car any less stealable :)

BAH! There ought to be a sticker checklist (or something) on ALL car parts that stores have to complete before sale.. ie

Is this Aus standard? y/n

Is this an illegal mod in the state of .....? y/n

(Is this overpriced/gheye and nothing but wank factor? y/n)

And so forth...

Might make it a little bit clearer and make more people impulse buy.. rather than "may not be legal for street driven cars" or whatever (ie check at your own leisure).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...