Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

(pot stiring)

if those 2jz's are so good how come Vlrb30's with less money spent on the vl as the tojo seem to fair just as well unless the 2j has half a morgatage attached ... I say well done toyota for having a go nice engine but clogged up breathing and a dating car.... now piss of back to rally,,,, jokes

Im yet to see a stock VLrb30 pull out 447rwkw stock, which shows that vlrb30 have to spend half a mortgage themselves :P

which one gets the chicks with the big tits??? thats the one i want :D

Roflmao @ this .... nah buddy supras pull the bimbos ... gtrs pull the smart sultrie sexier ones ... Like when you whooop a supra and his girfriend asks you to take her for a spin in that godzilla please ! ... shatters the poor fella both ways ... happened a few times on cruises now :domokun:

(pot stiring)

Also do your research the HKS GTR has craked well into the 7's.

I have done a search can't find anythig :)

veilside is also in the 7 second zone now too, just a few hundredths behind the HKS car.

Roflmao @ this .... nah buddy supras pull the bimbos ... gtrs pull the smart sultrie sexier ones ... Like when you whooop a supra and his girfriend asks you to take her for a spin in that godzilla please ! ... shatters the poor fella both ways ... happened a few times on cruises now :D

Cause a quality girlfriend would get out of your car and run off with another man cause his car was faster....

About the kw v time thing. Maybe my views are distorted from much time spent on supraforums when I had my supra. I just remember seeing some stupid dyno sheets with 600hp+ and they could manage a low 11 at best. It make sense they have good times if they really do make the power, just seems alot of supra boys use magic dyno's.

I am NOT hating on 2J's, I owned a na version and loved it (although it needed a turbo pretty bad, lol) but you see ALOT of this sorta stuff from supra owners. This image is a guy selling his car. He is proud of it :)

Supra_TT.jpg

I could be missing something, someone may have an explanation, but I have seen other like this, yet less extreme.

Maybe its not the engine, rather the stigma of supra, which says, ALL SHOW.

Cause a quality girlfriend would get out of your car and run off with another man cause his car was faster....

About the kw v time thing. Maybe my views are distorted from much time spent on supraforums when I had my supra. I just remember seeing some stupid dyno sheets with 600hp+ and they could manage a low 11 at best. It make sense they have good times if they really do make the power, just seems alot of supra boys use magic dyno's.

Have you heard of wheel spin? don't just look at the times also look at the mph, at times the time a car pulls it is not a true representation of what the car is really capable of. If a car can ran 11's but have very high mph it could of been wheel spinning most of the way (using shit tyres) which means that the car has shit loads of potential using better rubber and or suspension.

Cheers.

Come back and tell us when a mere 600hp Supra goes around Tsukuba in 57 seconds.

I love Supras,but come on,the GTR is in a different league.

All Sydneykid was saying is the Supra should be compared to other RWD cars,not the immortal GTR.

You dont need to defend your Supras honor,it is an incredible car,its just not a GTR.

Great power figures by the way.

I am not trying to defend supra's, I am just saying, if you are going to make points, at least make them worth while. Also, the GT series was dominated by Supra's, but, that is kinda unfair in saying, because the GTR's couldnt use 4WD, and the Supra's didnt use the 2JZ-GTE. I like the GTR, I have had 3 skylines, the skyline is a more 'throwable' car, but, when it comes to top speed, and handling at top speed, the supra feels much more at home than the GTR (that is stock for stock), after modifications, well, I guess it comes down to has the biggest bank account, and the best team of engineers really...

Edited by alpharisc
was it just me or was the stock supra with a bigger turbo and a f**ked diff, only 4 seconds slower then the million dollar gtr around that track

whats that about?

yep ur right mate, stock engine with bigger turbo, and had a wornout lsd. Still didn't do too bad. I think i got the vid some where, i'll post it soon.

I have been lucky enough to be in the passenger seat of a MINES customer car in Osaka ,(R34GTR) stage 2 for a short drive and nothing comes close to it. No car I have ever been in gets close and Ive been lucky to drive a V8 supercar in Oz and also driven Lambo's and Ferrari's but they all are slow compared to the Mines. But >>>I have seen some very quick Supra's at time attack days in Japan too-but they never get the times of the top tuned GTR's like Garage Saurus, Mines, M speed, Top Secret etc

Edited by overev1

If ppl have seen the HKS R34 driven at the same track alongside the Mones car, did anyone else notice something about the way they got down the straight. Surely this is the reason you can attribute much of the Mines cars performance ...anyone have times of it around Suzuka etc. Im betting that whislt it is still an amazing car, perhaps it wont look as good on bigger/faster tracks

The head to head at Tsukuba recently in a 5 lap race,the Mines car had a best of 57sec and the HKS was 1.01.

The Mines car is specifically built to be fast at Tsukuba,although I'm sure they could build a fast car to suit any track.

The head to head at Tsukuba recently in a 5 lap race,the Mines car had a best of 57sec and the HKS was 1.01.

The Mines car is specifically built to be fast at Tsukuba,although I'm sure they could build a fast car to suit any track.

yes mines gtr shits all over the Hks gtr, but than again it is not an easy task to beat a million dollar car specially built to be fast at Tsukuba.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's not a dumb question. I was circling this idea myself. User error is always possible!
    • Nope. The seal is in the drive. A new cable would just fill up and continue to convey oil to the speedo head. To check if this is what is happening, take the cluster out, dismantle the speedo and have a look. You probably don't even have to dismantle it. If there is oil coming up the cable, the drive into the speedo will be grossly greasy. I had to manually (and delicately) clean the gunk out of my speedo.
    • Thanks for the quick response mate, and I agree Nismo 555s, Z32 and high flow 2871 in OP6 housing (run by PowerFC) would all be "period correct" and should be a simple, reliable and reasonably quick track car.
    • It is normal for a speedo to read 0-10% high (unfortunately), intended by manufacturers and ADRs (although not in this case) to ensure your speedo does not read low if your tyres are worn. Speaking of which, what size tyres do you have on the rear, and what does they tyre placard say you should have? you can use this https://tiresize.com/calculator/ to determine what % difference that is causing Personally, when I buy tyres for a car I buy a size that will bring the speedo back to being more accurate; it if it reads 5% high I buy tyres that are 5% larger diameter. If you had an electronic speed sender like R33 onwards, the other option is to add a speedo adjuster but that won't work in R32. Finally, you  might be able to find a different sized gear for the speedo sender but that will be limited to what already exists (and I don't know what sizes do)
    • OK...so dumb question to check....do the hi beams actually come on when the push the stalk to engage them (keeping in mind your headlight switch must be at ON as well)
×
×
  • Create New...